Validation and Reliability Assessment of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) in Turkish Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

IF 0.8 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thoracic research and practice Pub Date : 2026-09-07 Epub Date: 2026-04-14 DOI:10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-5
Aylin Özgen Alpaydın, Elif Şen, Salih Yiğit, Derya Gökmen, Sibel Atış Naycı, Eylem Sercan Özgür, Demet Polat Yuluğ, Ahmet Melih Şahin, Elif Selçuk, Nurdan Köktürk, Ayshan Mammadova, Yelda Varol, Ayşe Baha, Funda Elmas, Alev Gürgün, İpek Çaylı Candemir, Mehmet Polatlı, İrem Şerifoğlu, Gaye Ulubay, Oya Baydar Toprak, Ali Kocabaş
{"title":"Validation and Reliability Assessment of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) in Turkish Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).","authors":"Aylin Özgen Alpaydın, Elif Şen, Salih Yiğit, Derya Gökmen, Sibel Atış Naycı, Eylem Sercan Özgür, Demet Polat Yuluğ, Ahmet Melih Şahin, Elif Selçuk, Nurdan Köktürk, Ayshan Mammadova, Yelda Varol, Ayşe Baha, Funda Elmas, Alev Gürgün, İpek Çaylı Candemir, Mehmet Polatlı, İrem Şerifoğlu, Gaye Ulubay, Oya Baydar Toprak, Ali Kocabaş","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate assessment of inhaler adherence is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) in a multicentre COPD cohort.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 277 patients were included. Sociodemographic characteristics and adherence status [assessed by the Turkish version of the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 (MARS-5); <i>İlaç Uyumunu Bildirim Ölçeği</i> (İUBÖ)] were recorded. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion validity was evaluated by agreement with İUBÖ using kappa statistics, and known-groups validity was evaluated by comparing the number of inhaler devices used. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item-total correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 66.3±8.3 years, 81.9% of participants were male. Most patients (73.6%) used at least two inhaler devices, and 28.9% were classified as non-adherent according to İUBÖ. Based on TAI scores, 43.3% of patients had good adherence, 23.8% had intermediate adherence, and 32.9% had poor adherence. CFA supported the two-factor structure of the TAI (Tucker-Lewis Index: 0.965; Comparative Fit Index: 0.972; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: 0.114). Criterion validity was demonstrated by good agreement between TAI and İUBÖ (kappa: 0.637, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients using more than one inhaler device were more likely to be non-adherent according to the TAI-10 (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Internal consistency was high for both the 10- and 12-item versions (Cronbach's alpha >0.90), with item-total correlations indicating adequate reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the TAI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing inhaler adherence in patients with COPD and is suitable for both clinical practice and research settings in Türkiye.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"280-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accurate assessment of inhaler adherence is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) in a multicentre COPD cohort.

Material and methods: A total of 277 patients were included. Sociodemographic characteristics and adherence status [assessed by the Turkish version of the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 (MARS-5); İlaç Uyumunu Bildirim Ölçeği (İUBÖ)] were recorded. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion validity was evaluated by agreement with İUBÖ using kappa statistics, and known-groups validity was evaluated by comparing the number of inhaler devices used. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item-total correlations.

Results: The mean age was 66.3±8.3 years, 81.9% of participants were male. Most patients (73.6%) used at least two inhaler devices, and 28.9% were classified as non-adherent according to İUBÖ. Based on TAI scores, 43.3% of patients had good adherence, 23.8% had intermediate adherence, and 32.9% had poor adherence. CFA supported the two-factor structure of the TAI (Tucker-Lewis Index: 0.965; Comparative Fit Index: 0.972; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: 0.114). Criterion validity was demonstrated by good agreement between TAI and İUBÖ (kappa: 0.637, P < 0.001). Patients using more than one inhaler device were more likely to be non-adherent according to the TAI-10 (P = 0.02). Internal consistency was high for both the 10- and 12-item versions (Cronbach's alpha >0.90), with item-total correlations indicating adequate reliability.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the TAI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing inhaler adherence in patients with COPD and is suitable for both clinical practice and research settings in Türkiye.

土耳其慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者吸入器依从性测试(TAI)的验证和可靠性评估
目的:准确评估吸入器依从性对于优化慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的治疗结果至关重要。本研究旨在评估土耳其版吸入器依从性测试(TAI)在多中心COPD队列中的有效性和可靠性。材料与方法:共纳入277例患者。社会人口学特征和依从性状态[由土耳其版药物依从性报告量表-5 (MARS-5)评估;İlaç Uyumunu Bildirim Ölçeği (İUBÖ)]的记录。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度,采用kappa统计通过与İUBÖ的一致性评估标准效度,通过比较使用吸入器的数量来评估已知组效度。信度评估采用Cronbach's alpha系数和项目-总相关性。结果:平均年龄66.3±8.3岁,男性占81.9%。大多数患者(73.6%)至少使用两个吸入器装置,根据İUBÖ, 28.9%的患者被归类为非粘附性。根据TAI评分,43.3%的患者依从性良好,23.8%的患者依从性中等,32.9%的患者依从性较差。CFA支持TAI的双因素结构(Tucker-Lewis Index: 0.965; Comparative Fit Index: 0.972; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: 0.114)。TAI和İUBÖ之间的一致性证明了标准的效度(kappa: 0.637, P < 0.001)。根据TAI-10,使用一个以上吸入器装置的患者更容易出现非依从性(P = 0.02)。10项和12项版本的内部一致性都很高(Cronbach's alpha >0.90),项目总数的相关性表明足够的可靠性。结论:土耳其版的TAI是评估COPD患者吸入器依从性的有效可靠工具,适用于土耳其的临床实践和研究环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书