A Tale as Old as Time: Contraception Concerns in the 21st Century.

IF 2.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Open access journal of contraception Pub Date : 2026-04-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S581526
Rachel Margaret Bottomley-Wise, Amie Woodward, Adenike Okanlawon, Amanda J Mason-Jones
{"title":"A Tale as Old as Time: Contraception Concerns in the 21st Century.","authors":"Rachel Margaret Bottomley-Wise, Amie Woodward, Adenike Okanlawon, Amanda J Mason-Jones","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S581526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historical inconsistencies in contraception research have led to concerns about side effects regarding hormonal contraception. Today, concerns about the hormonal contraceptive pill are still ongoing. The side effects from hormonal contraception and prevailing socioeconomic barriers to effective contraception have heralded in the use of Mobile Health (mHealth) applications as birth control methods. These applications are set to become ubiquitous with the proliferation of wearable devices that monitor biodata. Access to modern contraceptives depends on who you are and where you live and often has cost-implications. The use of \"mHealth\" applications has been rising in recent years and are marketed as having maximal reward for minimal cost and perhaps could alleviate some of these concerns. While mHealth applications are flexible, accessible, and low cost, this paper suggests that we exercise caution so as not to repeat past mistakes. We provide a critical review of the history of research into contraception. We may have come far, but we still have a long way to go for equitable access to contraceptive healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":"17 ","pages":"581526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13070127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S581526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historical inconsistencies in contraception research have led to concerns about side effects regarding hormonal contraception. Today, concerns about the hormonal contraceptive pill are still ongoing. The side effects from hormonal contraception and prevailing socioeconomic barriers to effective contraception have heralded in the use of Mobile Health (mHealth) applications as birth control methods. These applications are set to become ubiquitous with the proliferation of wearable devices that monitor biodata. Access to modern contraceptives depends on who you are and where you live and often has cost-implications. The use of "mHealth" applications has been rising in recent years and are marketed as having maximal reward for minimal cost and perhaps could alleviate some of these concerns. While mHealth applications are flexible, accessible, and low cost, this paper suggests that we exercise caution so as not to repeat past mistakes. We provide a critical review of the history of research into contraception. We may have come far, but we still have a long way to go for equitable access to contraceptive healthcare.

一个古老的故事:21世纪的避孕问题。
避孕研究的历史不一致性导致了对激素避孕副作用的担忧。今天,对激素避孕药的担忧仍在继续。激素避孕的副作用和普遍存在的有效避孕的社会经济障碍预示着使用移动健康(mHealth)应用程序作为节育方法。随着监测生物数据的可穿戴设备的普及,这些应用程序将变得无处不在。获得现代避孕药具取决于你是谁以及你住在哪里,而且往往需要支付费用。近年来,“移动医疗”应用程序的使用一直在增加,并被宣传为以最小的成本获得最大的回报,也许可以减轻这些担忧。虽然移动医疗应用程序灵活、可访问且成本低,但本文建议我们谨慎行事,以免重复过去的错误。我们提供了对避孕研究历史的批判性回顾。我们可能已经取得了长足的进步,但要公平获得避孕保健服务,我们还有很长的路要走。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书