Patterns and Determinants of Maxillofacial Trauma in Manipur: Prevalence of Protective Gear Use and Influence of Alcohol Consumption.

Wahengbam Tulsidas Singh, Deepak Ningombam Singh, Khwairakpam Chaoton Singh, Sanasam Gulshan Singh, Potsangbam Aparna Devi, Wahengbam Malvika
{"title":"Patterns and Determinants of Maxillofacial Trauma in Manipur: Prevalence of Protective Gear Use and Influence of Alcohol Consumption.","authors":"Wahengbam Tulsidas Singh, Deepak Ningombam Singh, Khwairakpam Chaoton Singh, Sanasam Gulshan Singh, Potsangbam Aparna Devi, Wahengbam Malvika","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2026.21.1.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Motor vehicle collisions, violence between individuals, falls, sports-related accidents and firearm injuries are frequent causes of maxillofacial trauma, which is a significant public health concern. Alcohol intoxication and a lack of use of protective gear are two factors that are known to raise the risk and complexity of these injuries. Despite its clinical and societal impact, region-specific data on the distribution of maxillofacial trauma by anatomical site and etiology in Manipur, India, remain limited. This observational investigation was conducted to determine the patterns of maxillofacial fractures in terms of anatomical location and causative factors, identify the prevalence of protective equipment usage and explore the relationship between alcohol consumption and the etiology, anatomical site and severity of facial injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective observational study was conducted over a two-month period at tertiary care hospitals in Manipur, enrolling 44 patients with radiographically confirmed maxillofacial trauma. Data on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation and imaging findings were systematically collected. The severity of facial injuries was assessed using the AIS-90 facial injury scale. Association between alcohol intoxication and various injury parameters were analyzed using the Chi-square test (p value < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Males constituted the predominant proportion of patients (84.1%), with a mean age of 31.1 years. Fractures of the mandible were most common (50%), followed by dentoalveolar (15.9%) and midfacial fractures (11.4%). Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the predominant cause (61.4%), followed by assault (13.6%) and accidental falls (9.1%). Only 2.3% of patients reported using protective gear at the time of injury. Alcohol intoxication was observed in 40.9% of cases and was significantly associated with RTAs (p value <0.05), fracture site (p value < 0.005) and severity (p value < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Motor vehicle collisions were identified as the leading cause of maxillofacial injuries, with alcohol intoxication and inadequate use of protective equipment markedly increasing both the risk and severity of trauma. Enforcement of helmet and seatbelt regulations, public awareness on alcohol-related risks and promotion of protective gear use are essential to reduce maxillofacial injuries in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"21 1","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13061447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2026.21.1.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Motor vehicle collisions, violence between individuals, falls, sports-related accidents and firearm injuries are frequent causes of maxillofacial trauma, which is a significant public health concern. Alcohol intoxication and a lack of use of protective gear are two factors that are known to raise the risk and complexity of these injuries. Despite its clinical and societal impact, region-specific data on the distribution of maxillofacial trauma by anatomical site and etiology in Manipur, India, remain limited. This observational investigation was conducted to determine the patterns of maxillofacial fractures in terms of anatomical location and causative factors, identify the prevalence of protective equipment usage and explore the relationship between alcohol consumption and the etiology, anatomical site and severity of facial injuries. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over a two-month period at tertiary care hospitals in Manipur, enrolling 44 patients with radiographically confirmed maxillofacial trauma. Data on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation and imaging findings were systematically collected. The severity of facial injuries was assessed using the AIS-90 facial injury scale. Association between alcohol intoxication and various injury parameters were analyzed using the Chi-square test (p value < 0.05). Results: Males constituted the predominant proportion of patients (84.1%), with a mean age of 31.1 years. Fractures of the mandible were most common (50%), followed by dentoalveolar (15.9%) and midfacial fractures (11.4%). Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the predominant cause (61.4%), followed by assault (13.6%) and accidental falls (9.1%). Only 2.3% of patients reported using protective gear at the time of injury. Alcohol intoxication was observed in 40.9% of cases and was significantly associated with RTAs (p value <0.05), fracture site (p value < 0.005) and severity (p value < 0.05). Conclusion: Motor vehicle collisions were identified as the leading cause of maxillofacial injuries, with alcohol intoxication and inadequate use of protective equipment markedly increasing both the risk and severity of trauma. Enforcement of helmet and seatbelt regulations, public awareness on alcohol-related risks and promotion of protective gear use are essential to reduce maxillofacial injuries in the region.

曼尼普尔颌面外伤的模式和决定因素:使用护具的流行程度和饮酒的影响。
机动车碰撞、人与人之间的暴力、跌倒、与运动有关的事故和火器伤害是颌面部创伤的常见原因,这是一个重大的公共卫生问题。众所周知,酒精中毒和缺乏防护装备是增加这些伤害风险和复杂性的两个因素。尽管它的临床和社会影响,在曼尼普尔,印度颌面外伤的解剖部位和病因分布的区域特异性数据仍然有限。本观察性研究旨在确定颌面部骨折的解剖位置和致病因素,确定防护装备的使用情况,并探讨饮酒与面部损伤的病因、解剖部位和严重程度之间的关系。方法:在曼尼普尔三级医院进行了为期两个月的前瞻性观察研究,纳入了44名经x线摄影证实的颌面部创伤患者。系统收集了患者的人口学特征、临床表现和影像学表现。采用AIS-90面部损伤量表评估面部损伤严重程度。采用卡方检验分析酒精中毒与各损伤参数的相关性(p值< 0.05)。结果:男性占绝大多数(84.1%),平均年龄31.1岁。下颌骨骨折最常见(50%),其次是牙槽骨骨折(15.9%)和面中部骨折(11.4%)。道路交通事故是主要原因(61.4%),其次是殴打(13.6%)和意外跌倒(9.1%)。只有2.3%的患者报告在受伤时使用了防护装备。结论:机动车碰撞被确定为颌面部损伤的主要原因,酒精中毒和防护装备的使用不当显著增加了创伤的风险和严重程度。执行头盔和安全带规定,提高公众对酒精相关风险的认识,并促进使用防护装备,对于减少该区域的颌面伤害至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书