Predicting 10-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard from 24-2C SITA Faster: Development and Validation of Deep24-2C.

IF 3.2 Q2 Medicine
Kei Sano, Euido Nishijima, Shunsuke Sumi, Yuka Igari, Gary C Lee, Aiko Iwase, Tadashi Nakano
{"title":"Predicting 10-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard from 24-2C SITA Faster: Development and Validation of Deep24-2C.","authors":"Kei Sano, Euido Nishijima, Shunsuke Sumi, Yuka Igari, Gary C Lee, Aiko Iwase, Tadashi Nakano","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2026.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate Deep24-2C, a machine learning (ML) model that reconstructs comprehensive Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 10-2 visual field (VF) thresholds from HFA 24-2C.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 3653 HFA 24-2C tests, including 181 actual tests from 136 eyes of 130 patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma, and 3472 synthesized tests at the Jikei University School of Medicine were included. Thirty-five actual HFA 24-2C tests from 24 eyes of 21 patients at Tajimi Iwase Eye Clinic were used for pilot external validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HFA 24-2C testing grid incorporates 10 additional central test points into the conventional 24-2 pattern. Deep24-2C was trained to predict all 68 threshold values of the HFA 10-2 test using subsets of 24-2C points (22-26 within the 10° region) along with age. Three ML architectures-random forest (RF), XGBoost, and multilayer perceptron (MLP)-were developed, and their ensemble combination was evaluated. Model training and internal validation were conducted using the Jikei dataset, while external validation used the Tajimi dataset. Data augmentation was applied using synthesized 24-2C tests, which combined paired HFA 24-2 and 10-2 tests. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mean absolute error for 10-2 point-wise thresholds and mean deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We first trained and validated Deep24-2C using the Jikei dataset. Incorporating synthesized data improved predictive accuracy from MAE 2.52 ± 0.07 dB to 2.42 ± 0.07 dB. Furthermore, models utilizing additional central test points outperformed those based on conventional 24-2 points across all ML architectures (RF, XGBoost, and MLP); the best-performing XGBoost model achieved MAE 2.30 ± 0.01 dB for predicting 10-2 thresholds. Subsequently, we performed external validation on the Tajimi dataset using an ensemble model that combined all models utilizing 10 additional central test points; the ensemble model yielded MAE 1.81 (95% confidence interval [1.69-1.93]) dB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep24-2C enables reconstruction of 10-2 VF thresholds from a 24-2C Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster test. Incorporating additional central points enhances predictive performance compared with conventional 24-2 grids. Deep24-2C may serve as a practical and efficient tool for evaluating central VF defects, reducing testing burden, and supporting individualized glaucoma management.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2026.04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate Deep24-2C, a machine learning (ML) model that reconstructs comprehensive Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 10-2 visual field (VF) thresholds from HFA 24-2C.

Design: A retrospective study.

Participants: A total of 3653 HFA 24-2C tests, including 181 actual tests from 136 eyes of 130 patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma, and 3472 synthesized tests at the Jikei University School of Medicine were included. Thirty-five actual HFA 24-2C tests from 24 eyes of 21 patients at Tajimi Iwase Eye Clinic were used for pilot external validation.

Methods: The HFA 24-2C testing grid incorporates 10 additional central test points into the conventional 24-2 pattern. Deep24-2C was trained to predict all 68 threshold values of the HFA 10-2 test using subsets of 24-2C points (22-26 within the 10° region) along with age. Three ML architectures-random forest (RF), XGBoost, and multilayer perceptron (MLP)-were developed, and their ensemble combination was evaluated. Model training and internal validation were conducted using the Jikei dataset, while external validation used the Tajimi dataset. Data augmentation was applied using synthesized 24-2C tests, which combined paired HFA 24-2 and 10-2 tests. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE).

Main outcome measures: Mean absolute error for 10-2 point-wise thresholds and mean deviation.

Results: We first trained and validated Deep24-2C using the Jikei dataset. Incorporating synthesized data improved predictive accuracy from MAE 2.52 ± 0.07 dB to 2.42 ± 0.07 dB. Furthermore, models utilizing additional central test points outperformed those based on conventional 24-2 points across all ML architectures (RF, XGBoost, and MLP); the best-performing XGBoost model achieved MAE 2.30 ± 0.01 dB for predicting 10-2 thresholds. Subsequently, we performed external validation on the Tajimi dataset using an ensemble model that combined all models utilizing 10 additional central test points; the ensemble model yielded MAE 1.81 (95% confidence interval [1.69-1.93]) dB.

Conclusions: Deep24-2C enables reconstruction of 10-2 VF thresholds from a 24-2C Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster test. Incorporating additional central points enhances predictive performance compared with conventional 24-2 grids. Deep24-2C may serve as a practical and efficient tool for evaluating central VF defects, reducing testing burden, and supporting individualized glaucoma management.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

更快地预测24-2C SITA的10-2标准:Deep24-2C的开发和验证。
目的:开发和验证Deep24-2C,这是一种机器学习(ML)模型,它从HFA 24-2C重建全面的汉弗莱场分析仪(HFA) 10-2视野(VF)阈值。设计:回顾性研究。参与者:共纳入3,653项HFA 24-2C测试,包括来自130名青光眼或疑似青光眼患者的136只眼睛的181项实际测试,以及池庆大学医学院的3,472项合成测试。从田津Iwase眼科诊所的21名患者的24只眼睛进行35次HFA 24- 2c实际检测,用于试点外部验证。方法:HFA 24-2C测试网格在常规的24-2模式中增加了10个中心测试点。Deep24-2C经过训练,使用24-2C点子集(10°区域内22-26)和年龄预测HFA 10-2测试的所有68个阈值。我们开发了三种机器学习架构——随机森林(RF)、XGBoost和多层感知器(MLP),并对它们的集成组合进行了评估。模型训练和内部验证使用Jikei数据集,外部验证使用Tajimi数据集。采用配对HFA 24-2和10-2检验相结合的综合24-2C检验进行数据增强。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)评估模型性能。主要结果测量:10-2点阈值MAE和平均偏差(MD)。结果:我们首先使用Jikei数据集训练并验证了Deep24-2C。综合数据将预测精度从MAE 2.52±0.07 dB提高到2.42±0.07 dB。此外,在所有机器学习架构(RF、XGBoost、MLP)中,使用额外中心测试点的模型优于基于传统24-2点的模型;最佳的XGBoost模型预测10-2阈值的MAE为2.30±0.01 dB。随后,我们使用集成模型对Tajimi数据集进行了外部验证,该模型利用10个额外的中心测试点将所有模型组合在一起;集合模型的MAE为1.81 (95% CI, [1.69-1.93]) dB。结论:Deep24-2C能够从24-2C SITA更快的测试中重建10-2 VF阈值。与传统的24-2网格相比,加入额外的中心点可以提高预测性能。Deep24-2C可作为评估中心VF缺陷、减轻测试负担和支持个性化青光眼治疗的实用有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书