Differentiation of Fat-poor and Atypical Adrenal Adenomas from Metastases: MRI-based Radiomic, Radiologic, and Radiomic-radiologic Machine Learning Models.
IF 1.1 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ceyda Turan Bektaş, Hasan Bulut, Ece Ates Kus, Melis Baykara Ulusan, Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoğlu
{"title":"Differentiation of Fat-poor and Atypical Adrenal Adenomas from Metastases: MRI-based Radiomic, Radiologic, and Radiomic-radiologic Machine Learning Models.","authors":"Ceyda Turan Bektaş, Hasan Bulut, Ece Ates Kus, Melis Baykara Ulusan, Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoğlu","doi":"10.2174/0115734056399745260330003149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The accurate differentiation of fat-poor and atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases remains a diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of MRI-based radiomic, radiologic, and combined radiomic-radiologic machine learning (ML) models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 37 patients with 44 adrenal masses (19 adenomas; 25 metastases). Data were split into training and testing sets (2:1). To expand the training set, data augmentation was performed by multiple sampling (56 labeled slices from 30 masses). Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2W), in-phase, out-of-phase, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences, while mass size, T2W signal intensity, heterogeneity, and signal drop were assessed as radiologic features. Dimension reduction was performed by reliability analysis and wrapper-based feature selection with five algorithms. A support vector machine was used for classification, and performance was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation and unseen testing. Friedman test and post-hoc analyses compared bootstrapped unseen test AUCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 12% of radiomic features demonstrated excellent reproducibility. A significant difference was observed among the three models, χ2(2)=779.5, p<0.001. The combined radiomic-radiologic model achieved the best performance (AUC 0.939; accuracy 85.7%), outperforming radiomic-only (AUC 0.898; accuracy 85.7%) and radiologic-only (AUC 0.857; accuracy 78.5%) models (adjusted p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Integrating radiomic and radiologic features improved classification performance compared to using either feature set alone. Although the reproducibility of radiomic features was limited, their complementary value enhanced model robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combined radiomic-radiologic ML model based on multi-sequence MRI may serve as a promising non-invasive tool for differentiating atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056399745260330003149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The accurate differentiation of fat-poor and atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases remains a diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of MRI-based radiomic, radiologic, and combined radiomic-radiologic machine learning (ML) models.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 37 patients with 44 adrenal masses (19 adenomas; 25 metastases). Data were split into training and testing sets (2:1). To expand the training set, data augmentation was performed by multiple sampling (56 labeled slices from 30 masses). Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2W), in-phase, out-of-phase, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences, while mass size, T2W signal intensity, heterogeneity, and signal drop were assessed as radiologic features. Dimension reduction was performed by reliability analysis and wrapper-based feature selection with five algorithms. A support vector machine was used for classification, and performance was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation and unseen testing. Friedman test and post-hoc analyses compared bootstrapped unseen test AUCs.
Results: Only 12% of radiomic features demonstrated excellent reproducibility. A significant difference was observed among the three models, χ2(2)=779.5, p<0.001. The combined radiomic-radiologic model achieved the best performance (AUC 0.939; accuracy 85.7%), outperforming radiomic-only (AUC 0.898; accuracy 85.7%) and radiologic-only (AUC 0.857; accuracy 78.5%) models (adjusted p<0.001).
Discussion: Integrating radiomic and radiologic features improved classification performance compared to using either feature set alone. Although the reproducibility of radiomic features was limited, their complementary value enhanced model robustness.
Conclusion: A combined radiomic-radiologic ML model based on multi-sequence MRI may serve as a promising non-invasive tool for differentiating atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.