Differentiation of Fat-poor and Atypical Adrenal Adenomas from Metastases: MRI-based Radiomic, Radiologic, and Radiomic-radiologic Machine Learning Models.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ceyda Turan Bektaş, Hasan Bulut, Ece Ates Kus, Melis Baykara Ulusan, Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoğlu
{"title":"Differentiation of Fat-poor and Atypical Adrenal Adenomas from Metastases: MRI-based Radiomic, Radiologic, and Radiomic-radiologic Machine Learning Models.","authors":"Ceyda Turan Bektaş, Hasan Bulut, Ece Ates Kus, Melis Baykara Ulusan, Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoğlu","doi":"10.2174/0115734056399745260330003149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The accurate differentiation of fat-poor and atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases remains a diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of MRI-based radiomic, radiologic, and combined radiomic-radiologic machine learning (ML) models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 37 patients with 44 adrenal masses (19 adenomas; 25 metastases). Data were split into training and testing sets (2:1). To expand the training set, data augmentation was performed by multiple sampling (56 labeled slices from 30 masses). Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2W), in-phase, out-of-phase, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences, while mass size, T2W signal intensity, heterogeneity, and signal drop were assessed as radiologic features. Dimension reduction was performed by reliability analysis and wrapper-based feature selection with five algorithms. A support vector machine was used for classification, and performance was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation and unseen testing. Friedman test and post-hoc analyses compared bootstrapped unseen test AUCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 12% of radiomic features demonstrated excellent reproducibility. A significant difference was observed among the three models, χ2(2)=779.5, p<0.001. The combined radiomic-radiologic model achieved the best performance (AUC 0.939; accuracy 85.7%), outperforming radiomic-only (AUC 0.898; accuracy 85.7%) and radiologic-only (AUC 0.857; accuracy 78.5%) models (adjusted p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Integrating radiomic and radiologic features improved classification performance compared to using either feature set alone. Although the reproducibility of radiomic features was limited, their complementary value enhanced model robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combined radiomic-radiologic ML model based on multi-sequence MRI may serve as a promising non-invasive tool for differentiating atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056399745260330003149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The accurate differentiation of fat-poor and atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases remains a diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of MRI-based radiomic, radiologic, and combined radiomic-radiologic machine learning (ML) models.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 37 patients with 44 adrenal masses (19 adenomas; 25 metastases). Data were split into training and testing sets (2:1). To expand the training set, data augmentation was performed by multiple sampling (56 labeled slices from 30 masses). Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2W), in-phase, out-of-phase, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences, while mass size, T2W signal intensity, heterogeneity, and signal drop were assessed as radiologic features. Dimension reduction was performed by reliability analysis and wrapper-based feature selection with five algorithms. A support vector machine was used for classification, and performance was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation and unseen testing. Friedman test and post-hoc analyses compared bootstrapped unseen test AUCs.

Results: Only 12% of radiomic features demonstrated excellent reproducibility. A significant difference was observed among the three models, χ2(2)=779.5, p<0.001. The combined radiomic-radiologic model achieved the best performance (AUC 0.939; accuracy 85.7%), outperforming radiomic-only (AUC 0.898; accuracy 85.7%) and radiologic-only (AUC 0.857; accuracy 78.5%) models (adjusted p<0.001).

Discussion: Integrating radiomic and radiologic features improved classification performance compared to using either feature set alone. Although the reproducibility of radiomic features was limited, their complementary value enhanced model robustness.

Conclusion: A combined radiomic-radiologic ML model based on multi-sequence MRI may serve as a promising non-invasive tool for differentiating atypical adrenal adenomas from metastases.

脂肪贫乏和非典型肾上腺腺瘤与转移瘤的鉴别:基于mri的放射学、放射学和放射学-放射学机器学习模型。
准确区分脂肪贫乏和非典型肾上腺腺瘤与转移瘤仍然是一个诊断挑战。本研究旨在评估基于mri的放射学、放射学和放射学-放射学联合机器学习(ML)模型的预测价值。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入37例44例肾上腺肿块(19例腺瘤,25例转移)。数据被分成训练集和测试集(2:1)。为了扩展训练集,通过多次采样(来自30个质量的56个标记切片)进行数据增强。从t2加权(T2W)、同相、异相和表观扩散系数(ADC)序列中提取放射学特征,同时评估肿块大小、T2W信号强度、异质性和信号下降作为放射学特征。通过可靠性分析和基于包装的特征选择五种算法进行降维。使用支持向量机进行分类,并使用10倍交叉验证和未见测试评估性能。Friedman测试和事后分析比较了自举未见测试auc。结果:只有12%的放射学特征具有良好的再现性。三种模型之间存在显著差异,χ2(2)=779.5, p讨论:与单独使用任何一种特征集相比,整合放射学和放射学特征可提高分类性能。虽然放射学特征的可重复性有限,但它们的互补价值增强了模型的鲁棒性。结论:基于多序列MRI的放射学-放射学联合ML模型可能是鉴别非典型肾上腺腺瘤和转移瘤的一种有前途的无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书