Nicholas Flynn, Ann Rahmann, Nia Luxton, Jessica Vu, Suzanne Kuys
{"title":"Rehabilitation technologies perceived positively by patients and facilitated intensive therapy within sessions.","authors":"Nicholas Flynn, Ann Rahmann, Nia Luxton, Jessica Vu, Suzanne Kuys","doi":"10.1071/IB24124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australian inpatient rehabilitation facilities are increasingly integrating rehabilitation technologies to support patient recovery. However, little is known about patient perceptions of rehabilitation technologies and the intensity of therapy able to be facilitated. This study aimed to quantify the amount of practice being achieved by patients in an Australian inpatient rehabilitation setting and explore their perceptions of upper limb rehabilitation technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multimethod study design was used to investigate the perceptions and use of rehabilitation technologies (i.e. InMotion, Fourier ArmMotus, SaeboReJoyce and Touch Accessible Platform for Interactive Technology) by adult inpatients. Semi-structured interviews and the System Usability Scale were completed. Observations of routine therapy sessions were undertaken to quantify the amount and intensity of technology-based practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants were recruited (50% male, mean age 62 years). A total of 15 sessions were observed across all participants using robot-assisted therapy and Touch Accessible Platform for Interactive Technology at an average duration of 35 min/session; of which 29 min was active therapy. Most participants described their experiences with rehabilitation technologies positively, highlighting benefits for recovery, enjoyability and easy usability. Participants rated the technologies highly on the System Usability Scale, with total scores ranging between 65 and 100 for usability, and a minimum rating of 'good' for user-friendliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rehabilitation technologies were well received by adults undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and with application for a range of impairments. The technologies facilitated enjoyment of daily therapy, and participants were comfortable with limited therapist input when using the devices. Additionally, participants were able to engage in highly intensive practice using the technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Australian inpatient rehabilitation facilities are increasingly integrating rehabilitation technologies to support patient recovery. However, little is known about patient perceptions of rehabilitation technologies and the intensity of therapy able to be facilitated. This study aimed to quantify the amount of practice being achieved by patients in an Australian inpatient rehabilitation setting and explore their perceptions of upper limb rehabilitation technologies.
Methods: A multimethod study design was used to investigate the perceptions and use of rehabilitation technologies (i.e. InMotion, Fourier ArmMotus, SaeboReJoyce and Touch Accessible Platform for Interactive Technology) by adult inpatients. Semi-structured interviews and the System Usability Scale were completed. Observations of routine therapy sessions were undertaken to quantify the amount and intensity of technology-based practice.
Results: Ten participants were recruited (50% male, mean age 62 years). A total of 15 sessions were observed across all participants using robot-assisted therapy and Touch Accessible Platform for Interactive Technology at an average duration of 35 min/session; of which 29 min was active therapy. Most participants described their experiences with rehabilitation technologies positively, highlighting benefits for recovery, enjoyability and easy usability. Participants rated the technologies highly on the System Usability Scale, with total scores ranging between 65 and 100 for usability, and a minimum rating of 'good' for user-friendliness.
Conclusion: Rehabilitation technologies were well received by adults undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and with application for a range of impairments. The technologies facilitated enjoyment of daily therapy, and participants were comfortable with limited therapist input when using the devices. Additionally, participants were able to engage in highly intensive practice using the technologies.
期刊介绍：
The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
