Healthcare inequalities in general practice due to educational level: A retrospective cohort study analysing patients' presentation and GP response to requests.
Sjoerd Hulshof, Tim C Olde Hartman, Reinier Akkermans, Henk J Schers, Annemarie A Uijen
{"title":"Healthcare inequalities in general practice due to educational level: A retrospective cohort study analysing patients' presentation and GP response to requests.","authors":"Sjoerd Hulshof, Tim C Olde Hartman, Reinier Akkermans, Henk J Schers, Annemarie A Uijen","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2649992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational level is an important social determinant of health and may contribute to healthcare inequity by affecting how patients present health problems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Explore the interaction between patients' educational level (1), their presentation of health problems to general practitioners (GPs) and (2) GP's responses to requested interventions.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study within a Dutch primary care practice-based research network.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All new episodes of care of patients' aged ≥25 years between 2014 and 2022 were included. Data were collected on the reason for encounter (RFE) at initial contact within each episode, and patients' educational level. Differences were analysed in incidence of RFE types (symptoms, intervention-requests, self-diagnoses) and GP's policies regarding requested diagnostic and therapeutic interventions among patients with low, medium and high educational levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with lower educational levels more frequently presented symptoms (59.7% versus 56.5%) and were less likely to present with intervention requests (OR 0.88) or self-diagnosis (OR 0.83). They requested more urine tests (RR 1.28), but fewer blood tests (RR 0.90), diagnostic imaging (RR 0.75) and referrals to primary (RR 0.74) and secondary care (RR 0.87). GPs responded more often to urine test requests (RR 1.25), but less often to referral requests to primary (RR 0.68) and secondary care (RR 0.80) among patients with lower educational levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasises GPs' need to understand how educational status affects patient's presentation and intervention preferences, which can improve communication, shared decision-making and enhance equitable healthcare delivery by addressing an important social determinant of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2649992"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13081339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2026.2649992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Educational level is an important social determinant of health and may contribute to healthcare inequity by affecting how patients present health problems.
Objectives: Explore the interaction between patients' educational level (1), their presentation of health problems to general practitioners (GPs) and (2) GP's responses to requested interventions.
Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study within a Dutch primary care practice-based research network.
Methods: All new episodes of care of patients' aged ≥25 years between 2014 and 2022 were included. Data were collected on the reason for encounter (RFE) at initial contact within each episode, and patients' educational level. Differences were analysed in incidence of RFE types (symptoms, intervention-requests, self-diagnoses) and GP's policies regarding requested diagnostic and therapeutic interventions among patients with low, medium and high educational levels.
Results: Patients with lower educational levels more frequently presented symptoms (59.7% versus 56.5%) and were less likely to present with intervention requests (OR 0.88) or self-diagnosis (OR 0.83). They requested more urine tests (RR 1.28), but fewer blood tests (RR 0.90), diagnostic imaging (RR 0.75) and referrals to primary (RR 0.74) and secondary care (RR 0.87). GPs responded more often to urine test requests (RR 1.25), but less often to referral requests to primary (RR 0.68) and secondary care (RR 0.80) among patients with lower educational levels.
Conclusion: This study emphasises GPs' need to understand how educational status affects patient's presentation and intervention preferences, which can improve communication, shared decision-making and enhance equitable healthcare delivery by addressing an important social determinant of health.
期刊介绍：
The EJGP aims to:
foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe
stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe.
Scope
The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology.
Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
