The Role of Metacognitive Processes in Personality Traits: A Dimensional Perspective Based on the DSM-5 Alternative Model.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2026-03-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.29399/npa.29257
İlker Güneysu, Burcu Eser, Sare Aydın, Figen Ünal Demir
{"title":"The Role of Metacognitive Processes in Personality Traits: A Dimensional Perspective Based on the DSM-5 Alternative Model.","authors":"İlker Güneysu, Burcu Eser, Sare Aydın, Figen Ünal Demir","doi":"10.29399/npa.29257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined the relationships between maladaptive personality traits, as conceptualized within the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), and metacognitive processes in a non-clinical adult sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 275 adults aged 18-65 years recruited from non-psychiatric outpatient clinics. Participants completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5, the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30, the Metacognitive Strategies subscale of the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome-1 questionnaire, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to examine associations between variables, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between metacognitive factors and personality traits while accounting for depression and anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation analyses revealed significant associations between maladaptive personality traits and metacognitive variables, with distinct patterns observed across different personality dimensions. Regression analyses showed that several metacognitive factors remained significantly related to specific personality traits after controlling for depression and anxiety. In particular, the Need to Control Thoughts was associated with Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism, whereas beliefs regarding the uncontrollability and danger of worry and metacognitive coping strategies were related to Negative Affectivity. Metacognitive factors showed limited associations with Detachment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that metacognitive processes are meaningfully related to maladaptive personality traits and that these associations extend beyond general emotional distress. Metacognitive characteristics, particularly those involving attempts to regulate and control internal experiences, may represent relevant processes for understanding personality-related difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":51142,"journal":{"name":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","volume":"63 ","pages":"361-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.29257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined the relationships between maladaptive personality traits, as conceptualized within the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), and metacognitive processes in a non-clinical adult sample.

Methods: The sample consisted of 275 adults aged 18-65 years recruited from non-psychiatric outpatient clinics. Participants completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5, the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30, the Metacognitive Strategies subscale of the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome-1 questionnaire, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to examine associations between variables, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between metacognitive factors and personality traits while accounting for depression and anxiety symptoms.

Results: Correlation analyses revealed significant associations between maladaptive personality traits and metacognitive variables, with distinct patterns observed across different personality dimensions. Regression analyses showed that several metacognitive factors remained significantly related to specific personality traits after controlling for depression and anxiety. In particular, the Need to Control Thoughts was associated with Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism, whereas beliefs regarding the uncontrollability and danger of worry and metacognitive coping strategies were related to Negative Affectivity. Metacognitive factors showed limited associations with Detachment.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that metacognitive processes are meaningfully related to maladaptive personality traits and that these associations extend beyond general emotional distress. Metacognitive characteristics, particularly those involving attempts to regulate and control internal experiences, may represent relevant processes for understanding personality-related difficulties.

元认知过程在人格特质中的作用:基于DSM-5替代模型的维度视角。
本研究在非临床成人样本中考察了在DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中概念化的适应不良人格特征与元认知过程之间的关系。方法:样本包括275名18-65岁的成年人,来自非精神科门诊诊所。参与者完成了DSM-5的人格问卷、元认知问卷-30、认知注意综合征-1的元认知策略子量表、患者健康问卷-9和广泛性焦虑障碍问卷-7。采用Pearson相关分析检验变量之间的关联,采用分层多元回归分析评估元认知因素与人格特质之间的关系,同时考虑抑郁和焦虑症状。结果:相关分析显示,适应不良人格特征与元认知变量之间存在显著的关联,且在不同人格维度上存在不同的关联模式。回归分析显示,在控制抑郁和焦虑后,一些元认知因素与特定人格特征仍有显著相关。特别是,控制思想的需要与对抗、去抑制和精神病有关,而关于担忧的不可控性和危险性以及元认知应对策略的信念与消极情感有关。元认知因素显示与超脱的关联有限。结论:研究结果表明,元认知过程与适应不良的人格特征有显著的关联,并且这些关联超出了一般的情绪困扰。元认知特征,特别是那些涉及试图调节和控制内部体验的特征,可能代表了理解人格相关困难的相关过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Neuropsychiatry (Arch Neuropsychiatry) is the official journal of the Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society. It is published quarterly, and four editions annually constitute a volume. Archives of Neuropsychiatry is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles on psychiatry, neurology, and behavioural sciences. Both clinical and basic science contributions are welcomed. Submissions that address topics in the interface of neurology and psychiatry are encouraged. The content covers original research articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书