Case Series of 72 Robot-Assisted Benign Gynecological Surgeries on a Novel Modular Robotic Platform.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Leena Mehrotra, Khetaji Bhurji Sodha, Hina Firdos, Magan Mehrotra
{"title":"Case Series of 72 Robot-Assisted Benign Gynecological Surgeries on a Novel Modular Robotic Platform.","authors":"Leena Mehrotra, Khetaji Bhurji Sodha, Hina Firdos, Magan Mehrotra","doi":"10.1007/s13224-025-02227-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic assisted surgery has attained widespread acceptance in the past two decades as the robotic platform provides 3D vision, tremor filtration and increased dexterity with upto 7 degrees of freedom. This original article is dedicated to providing an impartial assessment of robotic technology, elucidating our insights gained from 72 gynaecological surgeries conducted with a novel modular robotic system in a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meticulous examination of 72 robotic benign gynaecological surgeries was undertaken, wherein average operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and conversion rates were subjected to retrospective scrutiny.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A wide spectrum of benign gynecological pathologies could be dealt with using the robotic platform with acceptable operative time, blood loss and post operative complications. The average operative time for our first 25 cases was compared with the subsequent 47 cases, this difference was not found to be statistically significant (<i>p</i> value = 0.28) suggesting that there does not appear to be a significant learning curve for a trained laparoscopic gynecologist in transitioning to robotic gynecological surgeries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic benign gynecological surgery is feasible and safe. The novel modular robotic platform gives the advantages of an open surgeon's console, enhanced degrees of freedom of movement of instruments and stability. Robotic benign gynecological surgery appears to offer reasonable post operative recovery with acceptable intra and post operative complication profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"76 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-025-02227-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic assisted surgery has attained widespread acceptance in the past two decades as the robotic platform provides 3D vision, tremor filtration and increased dexterity with upto 7 degrees of freedom. This original article is dedicated to providing an impartial assessment of robotic technology, elucidating our insights gained from 72 gynaecological surgeries conducted with a novel modular robotic system in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: A meticulous examination of 72 robotic benign gynaecological surgeries was undertaken, wherein average operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and conversion rates were subjected to retrospective scrutiny.

Results: A wide spectrum of benign gynecological pathologies could be dealt with using the robotic platform with acceptable operative time, blood loss and post operative complications. The average operative time for our first 25 cases was compared with the subsequent 47 cases, this difference was not found to be statistically significant (p value = 0.28) suggesting that there does not appear to be a significant learning curve for a trained laparoscopic gynecologist in transitioning to robotic gynecological surgeries.

Conclusions: Robotic benign gynecological surgery is feasible and safe. The novel modular robotic platform gives the advantages of an open surgeon's console, enhanced degrees of freedom of movement of instruments and stability. Robotic benign gynecological surgery appears to offer reasonable post operative recovery with acceptable intra and post operative complication profile.

新型模块化机器人平台上72例机器人辅助良性妇科手术的病例系列。
背景:在过去的二十年中,机器人辅助手术已经获得了广泛的接受,因为机器人平台提供了3D视觉,震颤过滤和增加的灵活性,高达7个自由度。这篇原创文章致力于对机器人技术进行公正的评估,阐明我们在三级护理医院使用新型模块化机器人系统进行的72例妇科手术中获得的见解。方法:回顾性分析72例机器人良性妇科手术的平均手术时间、预估出血量、术后住院时间、术中术后并发症及转换率。结果:机器人平台可处理多种妇科良性病变,手术时间、出血量及术后并发症均可接受。我们将前25例的平均手术时间与随后的47例进行比较,这种差异没有统计学意义(p值= 0.28),这表明训练有素的腹腔镜妇科医生在过渡到机器人妇科手术时似乎没有明显的学习曲线。结论:机器人妇科良性手术是可行且安全的。新颖的模块化机器人平台具有开放式外科医生控制台的优点,增强了器械运动的自由度和稳定性。机器人良性妇科手术似乎提供合理的术后恢复和可接受的手术内和术后并发症概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书