Abigail E Lowe, Jocelyn J Herstein, Angel N Desai, Nahid Bhadelia, Christina F Yen, Preeti Mehrotra, Lauren M Sauer
{"title":"Ethical Preparedness for U.S. Biocontainment Units.","authors":"Abigail E Lowe, Jocelyn J Herstein, Angel N Desai, Nahid Bhadelia, Christina F Yen, Preeti Mehrotra, Lauren M Sauer","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10525-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biocontainment units (BCU) are purpose-built to provide medical care for patients with high consequence infectious diseases (e.g., viral haemorrhagic fevers, Middle East respiratory syndrome) and to contain the risk of disease spread. In the United States, high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) are often quarantinable diseases designated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local health departments, and BCU play a prominent role when public health faces an HCID threat. Patients admitted to a BCU have access to a high resource healthcare setting, but admission to the unit comes with restrictions to the rights and liberties of patients. This article begins with an introduction to BCUs and the preparedness activities that ensure the units are ready to respond. Next, it explores the significance of public health ethics for two public health interventions-quarantine and isolation care and diagnostic testing-that may place burdens on patients in a BCU. Finally, we make recommendations for integrating ethical considerations into preparedness activities to develop, formulate, and justify plans and protocols before the need to implement them in a BCU arises.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10525-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biocontainment units (BCU) are purpose-built to provide medical care for patients with high consequence infectious diseases (e.g., viral haemorrhagic fevers, Middle East respiratory syndrome) and to contain the risk of disease spread. In the United States, high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) are often quarantinable diseases designated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local health departments, and BCU play a prominent role when public health faces an HCID threat. Patients admitted to a BCU have access to a high resource healthcare setting, but admission to the unit comes with restrictions to the rights and liberties of patients. This article begins with an introduction to BCUs and the preparedness activities that ensure the units are ready to respond. Next, it explores the significance of public health ethics for two public health interventions-quarantine and isolation care and diagnostic testing-that may place burdens on patients in a BCU. Finally, we make recommendations for integrating ethical considerations into preparedness activities to develop, formulate, and justify plans and protocols before the need to implement them in a BCU arises.
期刊介绍:
The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies.
The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following:
-philosophy-
bioethics-
economics-
social theory-
law-
public health and epidemiology-
anthropology-
psychology-
feminism-
gay and lesbian studies-
linguistics and discourse analysis-
cultural studies-
disability studies-
history-
literature and literary studies-
environmental sciences-
theology and religious studies