Ethical Preparedness for U.S. Biocontainment Units.

IF 1.5 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Abigail E Lowe, Jocelyn J Herstein, Angel N Desai, Nahid Bhadelia, Christina F Yen, Preeti Mehrotra, Lauren M Sauer
{"title":"Ethical Preparedness for U.S. Biocontainment Units.","authors":"Abigail E Lowe, Jocelyn J Herstein, Angel N Desai, Nahid Bhadelia, Christina F Yen, Preeti Mehrotra, Lauren M Sauer","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10525-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biocontainment units (BCU) are purpose-built to provide medical care for patients with high consequence infectious diseases (e.g., viral haemorrhagic fevers, Middle East respiratory syndrome) and to contain the risk of disease spread. In the United States, high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) are often quarantinable diseases designated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local health departments, and BCU play a prominent role when public health faces an HCID threat. Patients admitted to a BCU have access to a high resource healthcare setting, but admission to the unit comes with restrictions to the rights and liberties of patients. This article begins with an introduction to BCUs and the preparedness activities that ensure the units are ready to respond. Next, it explores the significance of public health ethics for two public health interventions-quarantine and isolation care and diagnostic testing-that may place burdens on patients in a BCU. Finally, we make recommendations for integrating ethical considerations into preparedness activities to develop, formulate, and justify plans and protocols before the need to implement them in a BCU arises.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10525-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biocontainment units (BCU) are purpose-built to provide medical care for patients with high consequence infectious diseases (e.g., viral haemorrhagic fevers, Middle East respiratory syndrome) and to contain the risk of disease spread. In the United States, high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) are often quarantinable diseases designated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local health departments, and BCU play a prominent role when public health faces an HCID threat. Patients admitted to a BCU have access to a high resource healthcare setting, but admission to the unit comes with restrictions to the rights and liberties of patients. This article begins with an introduction to BCUs and the preparedness activities that ensure the units are ready to respond. Next, it explores the significance of public health ethics for two public health interventions-quarantine and isolation care and diagnostic testing-that may place burdens on patients in a BCU. Finally, we make recommendations for integrating ethical considerations into preparedness activities to develop, formulate, and justify plans and protocols before the need to implement them in a BCU arises.

美国生物防护单位的道德准备。
生物控制室是专门为患有严重传染病(如病毒性出血热、中东呼吸系统综合症)的病人提供医疗护理并控制疾病传播的风险而建造的。在美国,高后果传染病(HCID)通常是由疾病控制和预防中心以及州和地方卫生部门指定的检疫疾病,当公共卫生面临HCID威胁时,BCU发挥了突出作用。入住BCU的患者可以访问资源丰富的医疗保健环境,但入住该单元会限制患者的权利和自由。本文首先介绍bcu和确保单元准备响应的准备活动。接下来,它探讨了公共卫生伦理对两种公共卫生干预的意义——检疫和隔离护理以及诊断测试——这可能会给BCU的患者带来负担。最后,我们提出建议,在需要在BCU中实施计划和协议之前,将道德考虑整合到准备活动中,以开发、制定和证明计划和协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书