Identification of the Relationship Between Health Professionals’ Managerial Attitudes and Distractions in the Operating Room: A Mixed Design Study

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Yasemin Güner, Melek Üçüncüoğlu
{"title":"Identification of the Relationship Between Health Professionals’ Managerial Attitudes and Distractions in the Operating Room: A Mixed Design Study","authors":"Yasemin Güner,&nbsp;Melek Üçüncüoğlu","doi":"10.1155/jonm/5222283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Operating rooms are high-risk environments where managerial attitudes and workplace distractions significantly impact patient safety and teamwork. However, the relationship between these factors remains insufficiently explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to identify the relationship between healthcare professionals’ managerial attitudes and distractions in the operating room.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-methods research design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using a descriptive and cross-sectional approach, while qualitative data were obtained through a phenomenological design. 82 healthcare professionals in the operating room of a hospital were involved in the study. The Operating Room Management Attitude Scale and the Distractions in Surgery Index were used for quantitative assessment and analyzed via SPSS 22.0. Semistructured in-depth interviews provided qualitative data, which were evaluated using content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Managerial attitudes were identified as key determinants of team dynamics and workplace distractions. The total mean score of the Operating Room Management Attitude Scale was 148.95 ± 37.5, with the most affected subscales being stress and fatigue (30.85 ± 7.46) and work values (28.48 ± 8.12). The most common sources of distraction included temperature (62.68%), unavailable or not working equipment (57.8%), and tiredness (68.9%). Furthermore, inadequate organizational structures, communication deficiencies, and environmental factors contributed to increased distraction levels. Leadership style directly affected employees’ job satisfaction and stress levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Implications for practice: Implementing effective management strategies, ensuring a balanced distribution of workload, and minimizing distractions in the operating room can enhance patient safety by improving the efficiency and well-being of healthcare professionals. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of targeted interventions to mitigate these challenges.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/5222283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/5222283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Operating rooms are high-risk environments where managerial attitudes and workplace distractions significantly impact patient safety and teamwork. However, the relationship between these factors remains insufficiently explored.

Purpose

This study aims to identify the relationship between healthcare professionals’ managerial attitudes and distractions in the operating room.

Methods

A mixed-methods research design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using a descriptive and cross-sectional approach, while qualitative data were obtained through a phenomenological design. 82 healthcare professionals in the operating room of a hospital were involved in the study. The Operating Room Management Attitude Scale and the Distractions in Surgery Index were used for quantitative assessment and analyzed via SPSS 22.0. Semistructured in-depth interviews provided qualitative data, which were evaluated using content analysis.

Results

Managerial attitudes were identified as key determinants of team dynamics and workplace distractions. The total mean score of the Operating Room Management Attitude Scale was 148.95 ± 37.5, with the most affected subscales being stress and fatigue (30.85 ± 7.46) and work values (28.48 ± 8.12). The most common sources of distraction included temperature (62.68%), unavailable or not working equipment (57.8%), and tiredness (68.9%). Furthermore, inadequate organizational structures, communication deficiencies, and environmental factors contributed to increased distraction levels. Leadership style directly affected employees’ job satisfaction and stress levels.

Conclusions

Implications for practice: Implementing effective management strategies, ensuring a balanced distribution of workload, and minimizing distractions in the operating room can enhance patient safety by improving the efficiency and well-being of healthcare professionals. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of targeted interventions to mitigate these challenges.

确定卫生专业人员管理态度与手术室干扰之间的关系:一项混合设计研究。
背景:手术室是高风险环境,管理态度和工作场所干扰显著影响患者安全和团队合作。然而,这些因素之间的关系仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究旨在探讨医护人员的管理态度与手术室分心的关系。方法:采用混合方法研究设计。定量数据采用描述性和横断面方法收集,而定性数据通过现象学设计获得。82名医院手术室的医护人员参与了这项研究。采用手术室管理态度量表和手术分心指数进行定量评价,并通过SPSS 22.0软件进行分析。半结构化深度访谈提供了定性数据,使用内容分析对其进行评估。结果:管理态度被确定为团队动态和工作场所干扰的关键决定因素。手术室管理态度量表总平均得分为148.95±37.5分,其中影响最大的是应激和疲劳(30.85±7.46)分和工作价值(28.48±8.12)分。最常见的分心因素包括温度(62.68%)、设备不可用或不工作(57.8%)和疲劳(68.9%)。此外,不完善的组织结构、沟通不足和环境因素也导致了注意力分散程度的增加。领导风格直接影响员工的工作满意度和压力水平。结论:对实践的启示:实施有效的管理策略,确保工作量的平衡分配,并尽量减少手术室的干扰,可以通过提高医疗保健专业人员的效率和福祉来增强患者的安全。未来的研究应侧重于评估有针对性的干预措施的有效性,以减轻这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书