Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment and cancer.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Oscar Y Franco Rocha, Michelle C Janelsins, Allison Magnuson
{"title":"Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment and cancer.","authors":"Oscar Y Franco Rocha, Michelle C Janelsins, Allison Magnuson","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The review aims to synthesize the current evidence on decision-making and cancer treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and other related dementias.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current decision-making practices are not standardized, and evidence suggests that oncology physicians conduct burden-benefit analyses to guide treatment planning. There was a consensus on the importance of involving caregivers into the decision-making process. However, caregivers experience feelings of anxiety, uncertainty, and extra burden when deciding between treatment options and providing care. Nursing home staffs were frequently excluded from the decision-making process and were perceived as unprepared to identify and manage cancer symptoms. The planning and provision of care for this population can be guided by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGA can inform the decision-making process based on the patient's functionality and caregiver's resources, facilitate management of cancer care, guide the identification and management of cancer symptoms, and assist communication with patients and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with cancer and pre-existing cognitive impairment lacks standardization. CGA offers a standardized approach to guide treatment decisions, manage symptoms, and coordinate care by highlighting the needs and resources of patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"106-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The review aims to synthesize the current evidence on decision-making and cancer treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and other related dementias.

Recent findings: Current decision-making practices are not standardized, and evidence suggests that oncology physicians conduct burden-benefit analyses to guide treatment planning. There was a consensus on the importance of involving caregivers into the decision-making process. However, caregivers experience feelings of anxiety, uncertainty, and extra burden when deciding between treatment options and providing care. Nursing home staffs were frequently excluded from the decision-making process and were perceived as unprepared to identify and manage cancer symptoms. The planning and provision of care for this population can be guided by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGA can inform the decision-making process based on the patient's functionality and caregiver's resources, facilitate management of cancer care, guide the identification and management of cancer symptoms, and assist communication with patients and their caregivers.

Summary: Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with cancer and pre-existing cognitive impairment lacks standardization. CGA offers a standardized approach to guide treatment decisions, manage symptoms, and coordinate care by highlighting the needs and resources of patients and caregivers.

先前存在认知障碍和癌症的老年人的决策和治疗计划。
综述目的:本综述旨在综合现有证据,对已有认知障碍、阿尔茨海默病和其他相关痴呆的老年人进行决策和癌症治疗计划。最近的研究发现:目前的决策实践没有标准化,有证据表明肿瘤医生通过负担-收益分析来指导治疗计划。关于让照顾者参与决策过程的重要性达成了一致意见。然而,在决定治疗方案和提供护理时,护理人员会感到焦虑、不确定和额外的负担。养老院的工作人员经常被排除在决策过程之外,并被认为没有准备好识别和管理癌症症状。对这一人群的护理计划和提供可以通过全面的老年评估(CGA)来指导。CGA可以根据患者的功能和护理人员的资源为决策过程提供信息,促进癌症护理的管理,指导癌症症状的识别和管理,并协助与患者及其护理人员的沟通。总结:老年癌症伴认知障碍患者的决策和治疗计划缺乏标准化。CGA通过强调患者和护理人员的需求和资源,提供了一种标准化的方法来指导治疗决策、管理症状和协调护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书