Oscar Y Franco Rocha, Michelle C Janelsins, Allison Magnuson
{"title":"Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment and cancer.","authors":"Oscar Y Franco Rocha, Michelle C Janelsins, Allison Magnuson","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The review aims to synthesize the current evidence on decision-making and cancer treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and other related dementias.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current decision-making practices are not standardized, and evidence suggests that oncology physicians conduct burden-benefit analyses to guide treatment planning. There was a consensus on the importance of involving caregivers into the decision-making process. However, caregivers experience feelings of anxiety, uncertainty, and extra burden when deciding between treatment options and providing care. Nursing home staffs were frequently excluded from the decision-making process and were perceived as unprepared to identify and manage cancer symptoms. The planning and provision of care for this population can be guided by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGA can inform the decision-making process based on the patient's functionality and caregiver's resources, facilitate management of cancer care, guide the identification and management of cancer symptoms, and assist communication with patients and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with cancer and pre-existing cognitive impairment lacks standardization. CGA offers a standardized approach to guide treatment decisions, manage symptoms, and coordinate care by highlighting the needs and resources of patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"106-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: The review aims to synthesize the current evidence on decision-making and cancer treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and other related dementias.
Recent findings: Current decision-making practices are not standardized, and evidence suggests that oncology physicians conduct burden-benefit analyses to guide treatment planning. There was a consensus on the importance of involving caregivers into the decision-making process. However, caregivers experience feelings of anxiety, uncertainty, and extra burden when deciding between treatment options and providing care. Nursing home staffs were frequently excluded from the decision-making process and were perceived as unprepared to identify and manage cancer symptoms. The planning and provision of care for this population can be guided by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGA can inform the decision-making process based on the patient's functionality and caregiver's resources, facilitate management of cancer care, guide the identification and management of cancer symptoms, and assist communication with patients and their caregivers.
Summary: Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with cancer and pre-existing cognitive impairment lacks standardization. CGA offers a standardized approach to guide treatment decisions, manage symptoms, and coordinate care by highlighting the needs and resources of patients and caregivers.
期刊介绍:
A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.