Validation of EuroSCORE II in post-cardiac surgery patients in a tertiary institution in Hong Kong.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hong Kong Medical Journal Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.12809/hkmj2514125
K H L Ng, K Wang, T Fujikawa, M W T Kwok, J Y K Ho, S C Y Chow, J W Y Chan, K Lim, A T C Chang, I C H Siu, R H L Wong
{"title":"Validation of EuroSCORE II in post-cardiac surgery patients in a tertiary institution in Hong Kong.","authors":"K H L Ng, K Wang, T Fujikawa, M W T Kwok, J Y K Ho, S C Y Chow, J W Y Chan, K Lim, A T C Chang, I C H Siu, R H L Wong","doi":"10.12809/hkmj2514125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess the discriminatory ability and calibration performance of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II, a widely used risk prediction tool, in predicting postoperative mortality among patients undergoing cardiac surgery at Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH) in Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Complete data from 4180 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at PWH between 2013 and 2023 were available for validation of EuroSCORE II and comparison of its discriminatory ability with the logistic EuroSCORE. Discriminatory performance was primarily assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, coefficient of determination (R2), and normalised root mean square error (NRMSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EuroSCORE II demonstrated strong discrimination and good calibration for predicting 30-day mortality in the overall cohort (AUROC=0.829; Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.155) and key subgroups: isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [AUROC=0.847; P=0.113], isolated valve surgery (AUROC=0.810; P=0.162), and aortic surgery (AUROC=0.735; P=0.549). More than 85% of the variation in 30-day mortality (R<sup>2</sup>) was explained across these groups. Compared with the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II showed improved discrimination and calibration, with higher AUROC values and lower NRMSE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EuroSCORE II demonstrates strong discriminatory ability and good calibration for predicting 30-day mortality among patients undergoing cardiac surgery and within key subgroups-isolated CABG, isolated valve surgery, and aortic surgery-in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":48828,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"126-134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj2514125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the discriminatory ability and calibration performance of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II, a widely used risk prediction tool, in predicting postoperative mortality among patients undergoing cardiac surgery at Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH) in Hong Kong.

Methods: Complete data from 4180 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at PWH between 2013 and 2023 were available for validation of EuroSCORE II and comparison of its discriminatory ability with the logistic EuroSCORE. Discriminatory performance was primarily assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, coefficient of determination (R2), and normalised root mean square error (NRMSE).

Results: EuroSCORE II demonstrated strong discrimination and good calibration for predicting 30-day mortality in the overall cohort (AUROC=0.829; Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.155) and key subgroups: isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [AUROC=0.847; P=0.113], isolated valve surgery (AUROC=0.810; P=0.162), and aortic surgery (AUROC=0.735; P=0.549). More than 85% of the variation in 30-day mortality (R2) was explained across these groups. Compared with the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II showed improved discrimination and calibration, with higher AUROC values and lower NRMSE.

Conclusion: EuroSCORE II demonstrates strong discriminatory ability and good calibration for predicting 30-day mortality among patients undergoing cardiac surgery and within key subgroups-isolated CABG, isolated valve surgery, and aortic surgery-in this cohort.

在香港一所高等教育机构对心脏手术后患者进行EuroSCORE II的验证。
简介:本研究旨在评估欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE) II(一种广泛使用的风险预测工具)在预测香港威尔斯亲王医院(PWH)心脏手术患者术后死亡率方面的区分能力和校准性能。方法:利用2013年至2023年期间在PWH接受心脏手术的4180例患者的完整数据来验证EuroSCORE II,并将其与logistic EuroSCORE的区分能力进行比较。鉴别表现主要通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)进行评估。采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验、决定系数(R2)和标准化均方根误差(NRMSE)对校准进行评估。结果:在整个队列(AUROC=0.829; Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.155)和关键亚组:孤立冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG) [AUROC=0.847;P=0.113],孤立瓣膜手术(AUROC=0.810; P=0.162),主动脉手术(AUROC=0.735; P=0.549)。超过85%的30天死亡率(R2)差异可以在这些组中得到解释。与logistic EuroSCORE相比,EuroSCORE II具有更高的AUROC值和更低的NRMSE,具有更好的判别和校准能力。结论:在该队列中,EuroSCORE II在预测心脏手术患者和关键亚组(孤立性冠脉搭桥、孤立性瓣膜手术和主动脉手术)患者的30天死亡率方面具有很强的区分能力和良好的校准能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hong Kong Medical Journal
Hong Kong Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The HKMJ is a Hong Kong-based, peer-reviewed, general medical journal which is circulated to 6000 readers, including all members of the HKMA and Fellows of the HKAM. The HKMJ publishes original research papers, review articles, medical practice papers, case reports, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, and letters to the Editor. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to clinical practice and research in all branches of medicine. The HKMJ welcomes manuscripts from authors, but usually solicits reviews. Proposals for review papers can be sent to the Managing Editor directly. Please refer to the contact information of the Editorial Office.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书