Health-promoting lifestyle in cardiac patients: The mediating role of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between intimate relationships and distress tolerance.

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maedeh Mirzaei Malati, Majid Baradaran, Leila Moghtader
{"title":"Health-promoting lifestyle in cardiac patients: The mediating role of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between intimate relationships and distress tolerance.","authors":"Maedeh Mirzaei Malati, Majid Baradaran, Leila Moghtader","doi":"10.48305/arya.2025.45677.3105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to determine the predictive model of health-promoting lifestyle in cardiovascular patients based on intimate relationships and distress tolerance, mediated by cognitive flexibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research design was a cross-sectional correlational study using structural equation modeling. The statistical population included cardiovascular patients in 2025 who referred to three specialized cardiology clinics for outpatient examination. A total of 265 individuals were selected as the sample using convenience sampling. Standard questionnaires for health-promoting behaviors (Walker et al.), social intimacy (Miller and Lefcourt), distress tolerance (Simons and Gaher), and cognitive flexibility (Dennis and Vander Wal) were used. Statistical data analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and path analysis with bootstrap testing, employing AMOS 24 and SPSS 26 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of path analysis and bootstrap testing showed that the proposed model had a good statistical fit (χ²/df = 2.94, RMSEA = 0.071, CFI = 0.939, GFI = 0.990). The indirect effect of intimate relationships on health-promoting lifestyle through cognitive flexibility (β = 0.1148, p = 0.001) and the indirect effect of distress tolerance on health-promoting lifestyle through cognitive flexibility (β = 0.0924, p = 0.001) were confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The structural model, with good fit, explained the mediating role of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between intimate relationships and distress tolerance with health-promoting lifestyle in cardiovascular patients. These findings provide an operational framework for psychotherapy interventions based on strengthening distress tolerance and interpersonal relationships to improve cardiovascular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":"22 1","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13069124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2025.45677.3105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to determine the predictive model of health-promoting lifestyle in cardiovascular patients based on intimate relationships and distress tolerance, mediated by cognitive flexibility.

Methods: The research design was a cross-sectional correlational study using structural equation modeling. The statistical population included cardiovascular patients in 2025 who referred to three specialized cardiology clinics for outpatient examination. A total of 265 individuals were selected as the sample using convenience sampling. Standard questionnaires for health-promoting behaviors (Walker et al.), social intimacy (Miller and Lefcourt), distress tolerance (Simons and Gaher), and cognitive flexibility (Dennis and Vander Wal) were used. Statistical data analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and path analysis with bootstrap testing, employing AMOS 24 and SPSS 26 software.

Results: The results of path analysis and bootstrap testing showed that the proposed model had a good statistical fit (χ²/df = 2.94, RMSEA = 0.071, CFI = 0.939, GFI = 0.990). The indirect effect of intimate relationships on health-promoting lifestyle through cognitive flexibility (β = 0.1148, p = 0.001) and the indirect effect of distress tolerance on health-promoting lifestyle through cognitive flexibility (β = 0.0924, p = 0.001) were confirmed.

Conclusion: The structural model, with good fit, explained the mediating role of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between intimate relationships and distress tolerance with health-promoting lifestyle in cardiovascular patients. These findings provide an operational framework for psychotherapy interventions based on strengthening distress tolerance and interpersonal relationships to improve cardiovascular health.

心脏病患者促进健康的生活方式:认知灵活性在亲密关系与痛苦耐受关系中的中介作用。
背景:本研究旨在确定心血管患者基于亲密关系和痛苦耐受性,认知灵活性介导的健康促进生活方式的预测模型。方法:采用结构方程模型进行横断面相关性研究。统计人群包括2025年到三家心脏病专科诊所进行门诊检查的心血管患者。采用方便抽样法,选取265人作为样本。采用健康促进行为(Walker et al.)、社会亲密关系(Miller and Lefcourt .)、痛苦耐受力(Simons and Gaher .)和认知灵活性(Dennis and Vander Wal .)标准问卷。统计资料采用Pearson相关系数分析,通径分析采用bootstrap检验,采用AMOS 24和SPSS 26软件。结果:经通径分析和bootstrap检验,模型具有良好的拟合性(χ²/df = 2.94, RMSEA = 0.071, CFI = 0.939, GFI = 0.990)。证实亲密关系通过认知灵活性对促进健康生活方式的间接影响(β = 0.1148, p = 0.001)和痛苦耐受通过认知灵活性对促进健康生活方式的间接影响(β = 0.0924, p = 0.001)。结论:该结构模型拟合较好地解释了认知灵活性在心血管患者亲密关系与健康促进生活方式的痛苦耐受性之间的中介作用。这些发现为心理治疗干预提供了一个基于加强痛苦耐受性和人际关系的操作框架,以改善心血管健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARYA Atherosclerosis
ARYA Atherosclerosis CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书