Level of Personality Functioning in Turkish Clinical and Community Samples: Validation of the LPFS-SR-TR and Its Associations With Axis I Disorders.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Begum Yaman Ozcan, Sengul Cangur, Neslihan Kara, Numan Konuk
{"title":"Level of Personality Functioning in Turkish Clinical and Community Samples: Validation of the LPFS-SR-TR and Its Associations With Axis I Disorders.","authors":"Begum Yaman Ozcan, Sengul Cangur, Neslihan Kara, Numan Konuk","doi":"10.1002/pmh.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR-TR) and its associations with personality disorder (PD) categories and Axis I comorbidities. The cross-sectional study included 720 participants aged 18-65. From a consecutive sample of 732 patients who presented to the outpatient psychiatry clinic, experienced psychiatrists suspected 207 of having PD. They were further diagnosed using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). Patients were also investigated for Axis I disorders using the SCID-5 clinical version. A community-based control group of 513 participants recruited through convenience sampling received self-assessment-based SCID-II without a clinical interview. Both groups underwent the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and LPFS-SR-TR. The six-factor model provided the best statistical fit. Significant correlations between the LPFS-SR-TR and BFI indicate concurrent validity. Patients scored higher on the LPFS-SR-TR. Using a total score threshold of greater than 277.5 resulted in 93.2% sensitivity and 83.0% specificity (AUC = 0.94) for identifying PDs, indicating discriminant validity. Serial logistic models suggested incremental validity. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). The LPFS-SR-TR is valid and reliable for assessing the presence and severity of PDs. The hypothesized one-dimensional factor structure may be supported given its ability to distinguish PDs from a community sample. Axis I comorbidities are common and diverse without any discernible pattern.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":"20 2","pages":"e70076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR-TR) and its associations with personality disorder (PD) categories and Axis I comorbidities. The cross-sectional study included 720 participants aged 18-65. From a consecutive sample of 732 patients who presented to the outpatient psychiatry clinic, experienced psychiatrists suspected 207 of having PD. They were further diagnosed using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). Patients were also investigated for Axis I disorders using the SCID-5 clinical version. A community-based control group of 513 participants recruited through convenience sampling received self-assessment-based SCID-II without a clinical interview. Both groups underwent the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and LPFS-SR-TR. The six-factor model provided the best statistical fit. Significant correlations between the LPFS-SR-TR and BFI indicate concurrent validity. Patients scored higher on the LPFS-SR-TR. Using a total score threshold of greater than 277.5 resulted in 93.2% sensitivity and 83.0% specificity (AUC = 0.94) for identifying PDs, indicating discriminant validity. Serial logistic models suggested incremental validity. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). The LPFS-SR-TR is valid and reliable for assessing the presence and severity of PDs. The hypothesized one-dimensional factor structure may be supported given its ability to distinguish PDs from a community sample. Axis I comorbidities are common and diverse without any discernible pattern.

土耳其临床和社区样本的人格功能水平:LPFS-SR-TR的验证及其与I轴疾病的关联
本研究检验了土耳其版人格功能水平量表-自我报告(LPFS-SR-TR)的效度和可靠性及其与人格障碍(PD)类别和I轴合并症的关系。这项横断面研究包括720名年龄在18-65岁之间的参与者。从一个连续的732个病人的样本中,有经验的精神科医生怀疑有207人患有PD。他们进一步使用DSM-III-R人格障碍(SCID-II)的结构化临床访谈进行诊断。患者也使用SCID-5临床版本调查轴I障碍。通过方便抽样招募的513名社区参与者的对照组接受了基于自我评估的SCID-II,没有临床访谈。两组均进行大五量表(BFI)和LPFS-SR-TR。六因子模型提供了最佳的统计拟合。LPFS-SR-TR与BFI呈显著相关,提示并发效度。患者在LPFS-SR-TR上得分更高。使用大于277.5的总分阈值,识别pd的灵敏度为93.2%,特异性为83.0% (AUC = 0.94),具有判别效度。序列逻辑模型显示递增效度。量表具有较强的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.96)和重测信度(ICC = 0.86)。LPFS-SR-TR用于评估pd的存在和严重程度是有效和可靠的。假设的一维因子结构可能支持其区分pd与社区样本的能力。轴I合并症是常见和多样的,没有任何可识别的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书