[Safety and Clinical Benefit Analysis of No-chest-tube Strategy After Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Wedge Resection Based on Propensity Score Matching].

Q4 Medicine
Chutong Lin, Yingze Ning, Shanwu Ma, Jizheng Tang, Liang Jin, Wei He, Huayu He, Guangliang Qiang
{"title":"[Safety and Clinical Benefit Analysis of No-chest-tube Strategy After Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Wedge Resection Based on Propensity Score Matching].","authors":"Chutong Lin, Yingze Ning, Shanwu Ma, Jizheng Tang, Liang Jin, Wei He, Huayu He, Guangliang Qiang","doi":"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2026.102.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the wide application of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of small pulmonary nodules, the optimization of postoperative chest tube management has become a focus of enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the safety and non-inferiority of a no-drain strategy following uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 203 eligible patients who underwent surgery between January 2023 and May 2025 were enrolled and allocated to the no-drain group (n=53) and the drain group (n=150). After propensity score matching (PSM), 41 well-balanced pairs were generated. Non-inferiority testing combined with Bayesian analysis was performed to assess postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, the no-drain group met the predefined non-inferiority criteria for the incidence of postoperative fever (19.51% vs 26.83%), pleural effusion (24.39% vs 21.95%), and the proportion of patients requiring additional analgesics (12.20% vs 9.76%), with the upper bound of the 95%CI for between-group differences not exceeding the 10% non-inferiority margin. The no-drain group demonstrated a significantly shorter median postoperative length of stay (2.00 vs 3.00 d, P<0.001) and lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative day 1 (P=0.0495), with non-inferiority confirmed. However, non-inferiority was not established for secondary intervention rates (primarily chest tube reinsertion, 4.88% vs 0.00%) or radiologic complications (73.17% vs 65.85%), as the upper limit of the 95%CI for the between-group differences exceeded the 10% margin. Bayesian analysis showed that the probability that the positive rate of imaging-related complications in the no-drain group was higher than that in the drain group was 77.18%, and the probability that the absolute value of the difference in positive rates between the two groups greater than 10.0% was 44.45%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In carefully selected low-risk patients, a no-drain strategy following uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection may reduce postoperative pain and shorten hospital stay, while meeting non-inferiority criteria for key safety outcomes. However, non-inferiority was not demonstrated for secondary chest tube insertion or radiologic complications. Enhanced postoperative monitoring is therefore essential to ensure clinical safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":39317,"journal":{"name":"中国肺癌杂志","volume":"29 2","pages":"105-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13078958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国肺癌杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2026.102.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the wide application of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of small pulmonary nodules, the optimization of postoperative chest tube management has become a focus of enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the safety and non-inferiority of a no-drain strategy following uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection.

Methods: A total of 203 eligible patients who underwent surgery between January 2023 and May 2025 were enrolled and allocated to the no-drain group (n=53) and the drain group (n=150). After propensity score matching (PSM), 41 well-balanced pairs were generated. Non-inferiority testing combined with Bayesian analysis was performed to assess postoperative outcomes.

Results: After PSM, the no-drain group met the predefined non-inferiority criteria for the incidence of postoperative fever (19.51% vs 26.83%), pleural effusion (24.39% vs 21.95%), and the proportion of patients requiring additional analgesics (12.20% vs 9.76%), with the upper bound of the 95%CI for between-group differences not exceeding the 10% non-inferiority margin. The no-drain group demonstrated a significantly shorter median postoperative length of stay (2.00 vs 3.00 d, P<0.001) and lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative day 1 (P=0.0495), with non-inferiority confirmed. However, non-inferiority was not established for secondary intervention rates (primarily chest tube reinsertion, 4.88% vs 0.00%) or radiologic complications (73.17% vs 65.85%), as the upper limit of the 95%CI for the between-group differences exceeded the 10% margin. Bayesian analysis showed that the probability that the positive rate of imaging-related complications in the no-drain group was higher than that in the drain group was 77.18%, and the probability that the absolute value of the difference in positive rates between the two groups greater than 10.0% was 44.45%.

Conclusions: In carefully selected low-risk patients, a no-drain strategy following uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection may reduce postoperative pain and shorten hospital stay, while meeting non-inferiority criteria for key safety outcomes. However, non-inferiority was not demonstrated for secondary chest tube insertion or radiologic complications. Enhanced postoperative monitoring is therefore essential to ensure clinical safety.

[基于倾向评分匹配的单门视频胸腔镜肺楔形切除术后无胸管策略的安全性和临床效益分析]。
背景:随着单门视频胸腔镜在肺小结节诊治中的广泛应用,优化术后胸管管理已成为提高胸外科术后康复的重点。本研究旨在探讨单门静脉电视胸腔镜楔形切除术后无引流策略的安全性和非劣势性。方法:入选2023年1月至2025年5月期间接受手术的符合条件的患者203例,分为无引流组(n=53)和引流组(n=150)。经倾向得分匹配(PSM),得到41对均衡的配对。采用非劣效性检验联合贝叶斯分析评估术后疗效。结果:PSM后,无引流组在术后发热发生率(19.51% vs 26.83%)、胸腔积液发生率(24.39% vs 21.95%)和需要额外镇痛药的患者比例(12.20% vs 9.76%)方面符合预先设定的非劣效性标准,组间差异的95%CI上限不超过10%的非劣效性界限。结论:在精心挑选的低风险患者中,单门胸腔镜楔形切除术后的无引流策略可以减少术后疼痛和缩短住院时间,同时满足关键安全结果的非效性标准。然而,没有证明继发性胸管插入或放射学并发症的非劣效性。因此,加强术后监测对于确保临床安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国肺癌杂志
中国肺癌杂志 Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5131
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer(CJLC, pISSN 1009-3419, eISSN 1999-6187), a monthly Open Access journal, is hosted by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. CJLC was indexed in DOAJ, EMBASE/SCOPUS, Chemical Abstract(CA), CSA-Biological Science, HINARI, EBSCO-CINAHL,CABI Abstract, Global Health, CNKI, etc. Editor-in-Chief: Professor Qinghua ZHOU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书