An Innovative Curriculum to Empower Trainees and Faculty to Address Patient-Initiated Identity-Based Misconduct in the Clinical Learning Environment.

Q3 Medicine
Nkanyezi Ferguson, Lauren E Hock, Patrick Barlow, Aisha S Jamison, Marcy E Rosenbaum, Nicole Del Castillo
{"title":"An Innovative Curriculum to Empower Trainees and Faculty to Address Patient-Initiated Identity-Based Misconduct in the Clinical Learning Environment.","authors":"Nkanyezi Ferguson, Lauren E Hock, Patrick Barlow, Aisha S Jamison, Marcy E Rosenbaum, Nicole Del Castillo","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Training residents and attending physicians on effective communication strategies to manage biased patient and visitor comments is lacking. The I-RESPOND toolkit curriculum provides strategies for addressing identity-based misconduct in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resident physicians and faculty in 12 departments at a single academic center participated in the workshop between June 2021 and February 2022. The workshop consisted of interactive didactics, an introduction to the I-RESPOND toolkit, and opportunities to practice communication strategies with formative feedback. Retrospective pre/postworkshop survey instruments and a follow-up survey were used to evaluate the workshop and subsequent experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six (32%) of 204 participants (including residents and attendings) completed the workshop evaluations, with 15 workshops facilitated. Both groups of participants were significantly more confident in their ability to respond to identity-based misconduct after participation. The retrospective pre/postworkshop analysis of their perceived change in confidence in addressing the workshop educational objectives showed a significant increase in median confidence score from pre- to postworkshop (<i>p</i> < .001). On the follow-up survey, participants' mean ± SD rating (disaggregated sample, 50 participants) for the likelihood of using at least one strategy in the next 2 months was 4.2 ± 1.01 (on a 5-point scale; 1 = <i>Very unlikely</i>, 5 = <i>Very likely</i>), with 9 (32%) of 28 participants indicating they had intervened in the moment to address the behavior.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This curriculum increased awareness of the impact of patient-initiated misconduct and helped inform institutional policies related to the management of disruptive discriminatory behavior from patients and visitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"22 ","pages":"11591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13061878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Training residents and attending physicians on effective communication strategies to manage biased patient and visitor comments is lacking. The I-RESPOND toolkit curriculum provides strategies for addressing identity-based misconduct in the clinical setting.

Methods: Resident physicians and faculty in 12 departments at a single academic center participated in the workshop between June 2021 and February 2022. The workshop consisted of interactive didactics, an introduction to the I-RESPOND toolkit, and opportunities to practice communication strategies with formative feedback. Retrospective pre/postworkshop survey instruments and a follow-up survey were used to evaluate the workshop and subsequent experiences.

Results: Sixty-six (32%) of 204 participants (including residents and attendings) completed the workshop evaluations, with 15 workshops facilitated. Both groups of participants were significantly more confident in their ability to respond to identity-based misconduct after participation. The retrospective pre/postworkshop analysis of their perceived change in confidence in addressing the workshop educational objectives showed a significant increase in median confidence score from pre- to postworkshop (p < .001). On the follow-up survey, participants' mean ± SD rating (disaggregated sample, 50 participants) for the likelihood of using at least one strategy in the next 2 months was 4.2 ± 1.01 (on a 5-point scale; 1 = Very unlikely, 5 = Very likely), with 9 (32%) of 28 participants indicating they had intervened in the moment to address the behavior.

Discussion: This curriculum increased awareness of the impact of patient-initiated misconduct and helped inform institutional policies related to the management of disruptive discriminatory behavior from patients and visitors.

一个创新的课程,以授权学员和教师解决病人发起的身份为基础的不当行为在临床学习环境。
简介:缺乏对住院医生和主治医生进行有效沟通策略的培训,以管理有偏见的病人和来访者评论。i - response工具包课程为解决临床环境中基于身份的不当行为提供了策略。方法:在2021年6月至2022年2月期间,单个学术中心12个科室的住院医师和教师参加了研讨会。研讨会包括互动式教学,I-RESPOND工具包的介绍,以及通过形成性反馈练习沟通策略的机会。回顾性研讨会前后调查工具和随访调查用于评估研讨会和随后的经验。结果:204名参与者(包括住院医师和主治医师)中,有66人(32%)完成了工作坊评估,促进了15个工作坊。参与后,两组参与者对自己应对基于身份的不当行为的能力都明显更有信心。对他们在解决研讨会教育目标方面的信心感知变化的回顾性分析显示,从研讨会前到研讨会后,中位数信心得分显著增加(p < 0.001)。在后续调查中,参与者在未来2个月内使用至少一种策略的可能性的平均±SD评级(分类样本,50名参与者)为4.2±1.01(5分制;1 =非常不可能,5 =非常可能),28名参与者中有9人(32%)表示他们曾干预过解决这种行为的时刻。讨论:本课程提高了对患者发起的不当行为影响的认识,并有助于告知与管理患者和来访者破坏性歧视行为相关的机构政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书