Nkanyezi Ferguson, Lauren E Hock, Patrick Barlow, Aisha S Jamison, Marcy E Rosenbaum, Nicole Del Castillo
{"title":"An Innovative Curriculum to Empower Trainees and Faculty to Address Patient-Initiated Identity-Based Misconduct in the Clinical Learning Environment.","authors":"Nkanyezi Ferguson, Lauren E Hock, Patrick Barlow, Aisha S Jamison, Marcy E Rosenbaum, Nicole Del Castillo","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Training residents and attending physicians on effective communication strategies to manage biased patient and visitor comments is lacking. The I-RESPOND toolkit curriculum provides strategies for addressing identity-based misconduct in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resident physicians and faculty in 12 departments at a single academic center participated in the workshop between June 2021 and February 2022. The workshop consisted of interactive didactics, an introduction to the I-RESPOND toolkit, and opportunities to practice communication strategies with formative feedback. Retrospective pre/postworkshop survey instruments and a follow-up survey were used to evaluate the workshop and subsequent experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six (32%) of 204 participants (including residents and attendings) completed the workshop evaluations, with 15 workshops facilitated. Both groups of participants were significantly more confident in their ability to respond to identity-based misconduct after participation. The retrospective pre/postworkshop analysis of their perceived change in confidence in addressing the workshop educational objectives showed a significant increase in median confidence score from pre- to postworkshop (<i>p</i> < .001). On the follow-up survey, participants' mean ± SD rating (disaggregated sample, 50 participants) for the likelihood of using at least one strategy in the next 2 months was 4.2 ± 1.01 (on a 5-point scale; 1 = <i>Very unlikely</i>, 5 = <i>Very likely</i>), with 9 (32%) of 28 participants indicating they had intervened in the moment to address the behavior.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This curriculum increased awareness of the impact of patient-initiated misconduct and helped inform institutional policies related to the management of disruptive discriminatory behavior from patients and visitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"22 ","pages":"11591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13061878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Training residents and attending physicians on effective communication strategies to manage biased patient and visitor comments is lacking. The I-RESPOND toolkit curriculum provides strategies for addressing identity-based misconduct in the clinical setting.
Methods: Resident physicians and faculty in 12 departments at a single academic center participated in the workshop between June 2021 and February 2022. The workshop consisted of interactive didactics, an introduction to the I-RESPOND toolkit, and opportunities to practice communication strategies with formative feedback. Retrospective pre/postworkshop survey instruments and a follow-up survey were used to evaluate the workshop and subsequent experiences.
Results: Sixty-six (32%) of 204 participants (including residents and attendings) completed the workshop evaluations, with 15 workshops facilitated. Both groups of participants were significantly more confident in their ability to respond to identity-based misconduct after participation. The retrospective pre/postworkshop analysis of their perceived change in confidence in addressing the workshop educational objectives showed a significant increase in median confidence score from pre- to postworkshop (p < .001). On the follow-up survey, participants' mean ± SD rating (disaggregated sample, 50 participants) for the likelihood of using at least one strategy in the next 2 months was 4.2 ± 1.01 (on a 5-point scale; 1 = Very unlikely, 5 = Very likely), with 9 (32%) of 28 participants indicating they had intervened in the moment to address the behavior.
Discussion: This curriculum increased awareness of the impact of patient-initiated misconduct and helped inform institutional policies related to the management of disruptive discriminatory behavior from patients and visitors.