Black is the new blue? A cross-sectional Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) survey of colour preferences for scrubs, PPE and the dental clinical environment.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Abubaker Qutieshat, Reem T Al Amry, Zahra Mustafa, Mahmoud Rezk, Ghaid L Al Riyami, Majid Hamid-Oudjana, Laila Kebab, Ahmed Al Wahaibi, Rayhana Aouididi, Klara Avetisyan
{"title":"Black is the new blue? A cross-sectional Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) survey of colour preferences for scrubs, PPE and the dental clinical environment.","authors":"Abubaker Qutieshat, Reem T Al Amry, Zahra Mustafa, Mahmoud Rezk, Ghaid L Al Riyami, Majid Hamid-Oudjana, Laila Kebab, Ahmed Al Wahaibi, Rayhana Aouididi, Klara Avetisyan","doi":"10.1038/s41405-026-00426-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colour cues in dental clinics may shape perceptions of professionalism, comfort, hygiene and anxiety, yet evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) settings across attire, PPE and the operatory environment remains limited. This study examined colour preferences across Oman, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, web-based survey was completed by non-healthcare university students in Oman (n = 193), UAE (n = 250) and Bahrain (n = 170) (total N = 613). Participants selected preferred colours for scrubs and multiple dental items (PPE, chairside disposables, dental chair and wall colour), indicated scrub colour by clinical scenario (routine, surgical, paediatric), endorsed 'comfortable' colours (select-all), and rated five attitudinal statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Between-country differences were examined using chi-square tests (Cramer's V) and Kruskal-Wallis tests; additional modelling included GEE for comfort endorsements and exploratory logistic regression for scenario switching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scrub preferences clustered around classic colours (blue/black), with modest between-country differences (χ² = 24.09, df = 10, p = 0.007; V = 0.14). Oman most preferred black (50.3%) then blue (41.5%); the UAE preferred blue (52.8%) then black (42.0%); Bahrain preferred blue (47.1%) then black (37.1%). Scenario framing increased openness to non-classic colours in paediatric care (red and yellow), and only 16.6% retained the same scrub colour across all scenarios. For other items, classic/neutral tones predominated, with significant country differences for most categories (including masks, wall colour, dental chair, dental bib, disposable kit and suction tips), while glove colour distributions were broadly similar. Warm/yellow operatory lighting was preferred over white lighting overall (60.2%) with negligible between-country differences (p = 0.881). Comfort endorsements were highest for blue and white; patterned prints showed the clearest country separation (UAE 50.4% vs Oman 36.8% and Bahrain 35.9%), persisting in adjusted GEE models. Most respondents disagreed that darker colours appear less hygienic, although distributions differed modestly across countries (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colour preferences in GCC dental settings are anchored in a stable 'classic' palette, while scenario and item context introduce actionable departures, particularly for paediatric care. Black competed directly with blue across several domains and was not generally viewed as less hygienic, supporting its inclusion within a 'safe' procurement palette. Preference for warm lighting suggests a practical environmental lever to enhance perceived comfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00426-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colour cues in dental clinics may shape perceptions of professionalism, comfort, hygiene and anxiety, yet evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) settings across attire, PPE and the operatory environment remains limited. This study examined colour preferences across Oman, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain.

Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was completed by non-healthcare university students in Oman (n = 193), UAE (n = 250) and Bahrain (n = 170) (total N = 613). Participants selected preferred colours for scrubs and multiple dental items (PPE, chairside disposables, dental chair and wall colour), indicated scrub colour by clinical scenario (routine, surgical, paediatric), endorsed 'comfortable' colours (select-all), and rated five attitudinal statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Between-country differences were examined using chi-square tests (Cramer's V) and Kruskal-Wallis tests; additional modelling included GEE for comfort endorsements and exploratory logistic regression for scenario switching.

Results: Scrub preferences clustered around classic colours (blue/black), with modest between-country differences (χ² = 24.09, df = 10, p = 0.007; V = 0.14). Oman most preferred black (50.3%) then blue (41.5%); the UAE preferred blue (52.8%) then black (42.0%); Bahrain preferred blue (47.1%) then black (37.1%). Scenario framing increased openness to non-classic colours in paediatric care (red and yellow), and only 16.6% retained the same scrub colour across all scenarios. For other items, classic/neutral tones predominated, with significant country differences for most categories (including masks, wall colour, dental chair, dental bib, disposable kit and suction tips), while glove colour distributions were broadly similar. Warm/yellow operatory lighting was preferred over white lighting overall (60.2%) with negligible between-country differences (p = 0.881). Comfort endorsements were highest for blue and white; patterned prints showed the clearest country separation (UAE 50.4% vs Oman 36.8% and Bahrain 35.9%), persisting in adjusted GEE models. Most respondents disagreed that darker colours appear less hygienic, although distributions differed modestly across countries (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.010).

Conclusions: Colour preferences in GCC dental settings are anchored in a stable 'classic' palette, while scenario and item context introduce actionable departures, particularly for paediatric care. Black competed directly with blue across several domains and was not generally viewed as less hygienic, supporting its inclusion within a 'safe' procurement palette. Preference for warm lighting suggests a practical environmental lever to enhance perceived comfort.

黑色是新的蓝色?海湾合作委员会(GCC)关于磨砂膏、个人防护用品和牙科临床环境颜色偏好的横断面调查。
背景:牙科诊所的颜色提示可能会影响对专业、舒适、卫生和焦虑的看法,但来自海湾合作委员会(GCC)设置的服装、个人防护装备和手术环境的证据仍然有限。这项研究调查了阿曼、阿拉伯联合酋长国和巴林的颜色偏好。方法:对阿曼(n = 193)、阿联酋(n = 250)和巴林(n = 170)的非保健专业大学生(n = 613)进行横断面网络调查。参与者为磨砂膏和多种牙科用品(个人防护用品、椅子边的一次性用品、牙科椅和墙壁颜色)选择首选颜色,根据临床场景(常规、外科、儿科)指定磨砂膏的颜色,认可“舒适”的颜色(选择全部),并在5分李克特量表上对5种态度陈述进行评分。使用卡方检验(Cramer's V)和Kruskal-Wallis检验检验国家间差异;额外的建模包括用于舒适度认可的GEE和用于场景切换的探索性逻辑回归。结果:擦洗偏好集中在经典颜色(蓝色/黑色)周围,国家间差异不大(χ²= 24.09,df = 10, p = 0.007; V = 0.14)。阿曼最喜欢黑色(50.3%),其次是蓝色(41.5%);阿联酋喜欢蓝色(52.8%),然后是黑色(42.0%);巴林喜欢蓝色(47.1%),然后是黑色(37.1%)。场景框架增加了儿科护理对非经典颜色(红色和黄色)的开放性,只有16.6%的人在所有场景中保留了相同的擦洗颜色。对于其他物品,经典/中性色调占主导地位,大多数类别(包括口罩,墙壁颜色,牙科椅,牙科围嘴,一次性工具包和吸嘴)存在显著的国家差异,而手套颜色分布大致相似。温暖/黄色手术照明比白色照明更受欢迎(60.2%),国家之间的差异可以忽略不计(p = 0.881)。蓝色和白色的舒适度代言率最高;图案印花显示出最明显的国家差异(阿联酋50.4%,阿曼36.8%,巴林35.9%),坚持调整后的GEE模型。大多数受访者不同意深色看起来不那么卫生,尽管各国的分布略有不同(Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.010)。结论:GCC牙科设置的颜色偏好固定在稳定的“经典”调色板上,而场景和项目上下文引入了可操作的偏离,特别是对于儿科护理。在几个领域,黑色与蓝色直接竞争,通常不被视为不卫生,支持将其纳入“安全”采购调色板。对温暖照明的偏好暗示了一种实用的环境杠杆,以增强感知的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书