Prefrontal and Cerebellar Contributions to Semantic Memory Retrieval.

IF 3.1 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Neurobiology of Language Pub Date : 2026-03-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1162/NOL.a.235
Adam Kubinec, Rastislav Rovný, Igor Riečanský, Martin Marko
{"title":"Prefrontal and Cerebellar Contributions to Semantic Memory Retrieval.","authors":"Adam Kubinec, Rastislav Rovný, Igor Riečanský, Martin Marko","doi":"10.1162/NOL.a.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Semantic memory retrieval is essential for language, thought, and adaptive behavior. Although both the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the cerebellum have been implicated in this function, the role of the PFC remains poorly understood and the contribution of the cerebellum largely overlooked in current neurocognitive models. To address these gaps, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled experiment in which healthy adults received anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the left lateral PFC, the right posterior cerebellum, or sham stimulation. Participants completed a novel process-sensitive paradigm comprising lexical decision, free-associative (FA; automatic) retrieval, dissociative (DA; controlled) retrieval, and intrusion monitoring, while manipulating response predictability and rule switching. Cerebellar tDCS selectively impaired FA performance, particularly for cues evoking predictable responses, supporting its role in automatic access to overlearned associations. In contrast, prefrontal tDCS disrupted DA performance and increased associative intrusions, implicating the PFC in retrieval inhibition. Importantly, mediation analysis showed that the reduction in DA fluency was largely explained by higher probability of intrusions, indicating a perturbation of proactive inhibitory control that normally prevents irrelevant memory activations from entering working memory. Further exploratory analyses ruled out several alternative accounts of these stimulation effects, underscoring their process specificity. Together, these findings advance models of semantic cognition by demonstrating complementary contributions of the cerebellum to automatic retrieval and of the PFC to inhibitory control over intrusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"7 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/NOL.a.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Semantic memory retrieval is essential for language, thought, and adaptive behavior. Although both the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the cerebellum have been implicated in this function, the role of the PFC remains poorly understood and the contribution of the cerebellum largely overlooked in current neurocognitive models. To address these gaps, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled experiment in which healthy adults received anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the left lateral PFC, the right posterior cerebellum, or sham stimulation. Participants completed a novel process-sensitive paradigm comprising lexical decision, free-associative (FA; automatic) retrieval, dissociative (DA; controlled) retrieval, and intrusion monitoring, while manipulating response predictability and rule switching. Cerebellar tDCS selectively impaired FA performance, particularly for cues evoking predictable responses, supporting its role in automatic access to overlearned associations. In contrast, prefrontal tDCS disrupted DA performance and increased associative intrusions, implicating the PFC in retrieval inhibition. Importantly, mediation analysis showed that the reduction in DA fluency was largely explained by higher probability of intrusions, indicating a perturbation of proactive inhibitory control that normally prevents irrelevant memory activations from entering working memory. Further exploratory analyses ruled out several alternative accounts of these stimulation effects, underscoring their process specificity. Together, these findings advance models of semantic cognition by demonstrating complementary contributions of the cerebellum to automatic retrieval and of the PFC to inhibitory control over intrusions.

前额叶和小脑对语义记忆检索的贡献。
语义记忆检索对语言、思维和适应性行为至关重要。尽管前额叶皮层(PFC)和小脑都参与了这一功能,但在当前的神经认知模型中,人们对PFC的作用知之甚少,小脑的作用在很大程度上被忽视了。为了解决这些空白,我们进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照实验,在该实验中,健康成年人接受了针对左侧PFC、右侧小脑后部或假刺激的阳极经颅直流刺激(tDCS)。参与者完成了一个新的过程敏感范式,包括词汇决策、自由联想(FA;自动)检索、分离(DA;控制)检索和入侵监测,同时操纵反应可预测性和规则切换。小脑tDCS选择性地损害了FA的表现,特别是对引起可预测反应的线索,支持其在过度学习联想的自动获取中的作用。相比之下,前额叶tDCS破坏了DA的表现,增加了联想侵入,暗示PFC参与了检索抑制。重要的是,中介分析表明,DA流畅性的降低在很大程度上可以用更高的入侵概率来解释,这表明主动抑制控制受到干扰,而主动抑制控制通常会阻止无关的记忆激活进入工作记忆。进一步的探索性分析排除了这些刺激效应的几种替代解释,强调了它们的过程特异性。总之,这些发现通过证明小脑对自动检索和PFC对入侵抑制控制的互补贡献,推进了语义认知模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书