Effect of a dynamic wrist-hand orthosis combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb and hand function in acute and sub-acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-14 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2026.2648215
Songhua Huang, Tianhao Gao, Junqi Ling, Jing Tian, Chan Chen, Rongrong Lu, Yulong Bai
{"title":"Effect of a dynamic wrist-hand orthosis combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb and hand function in acute and sub-acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Songhua Huang, Tianhao Gao, Junqi Ling, Jing Tian, Chan Chen, Rongrong Lu, Yulong Bai","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2026.2648215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is a \"rehabilitation strategy\" supported by numerous basic studies. However, its clinical implementation is often limited by the poor ability of the affected limb.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To combine mCIMT plus a SaeboGlove for persons who would not normally qualify for mCIMT training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Part A: mCIMT+Saebo group (<i>n</i> = 18) and mCIMT group (<i>n</i> = 19). Part B: mCIMT+Saebo group (<i>n</i> = 10) and control group (<i>n</i> = 9). Both parts were assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trials. In addition to conventional rehabilitation therapy, all groups, except the control group, underwent mCIMT. The mCIMT group wore a mitt for approximately 4 hours per day, 5 days a week, for 3 consecutive weeks. The mCIMT+Saebo group wore both the SaeboGlove and a mitt for the same duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Part A: Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) showed that mCIMT+Saebo group scored 7.23 points higher (95% CI 1.93 to 12.53) than mCIMT group (P < 0.05). Hand grip strength (item 14 of WMFT) scored 3.29 points higher (95% CI 1.35 to 5.24) than in the mCIMT group (P < 0.01). Part B: The WMFT showed that mCIMT+Saebo group scored 5.45 points higher (95% CI 1.92 to 8.98) than the control group (P < 0.01). Hand grip strength was 2.66 points higher (95% CI 1.33 to 3.99) (P < 0.001), and ARAT was 10.75 points higher (95% CI 0.93 to 20.57) than in the control group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SaeboGlove may enhance the therapeutic advantages of mCIMT and expand the inclusion criteria for CIMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"789-799"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2026.2648215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is a "rehabilitation strategy" supported by numerous basic studies. However, its clinical implementation is often limited by the poor ability of the affected limb.

Objectives: To combine mCIMT plus a SaeboGlove for persons who would not normally qualify for mCIMT training.

Methods: Part A: mCIMT+Saebo group (n = 18) and mCIMT group (n = 19). Part B: mCIMT+Saebo group (n = 10) and control group (n = 9). Both parts were assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trials. In addition to conventional rehabilitation therapy, all groups, except the control group, underwent mCIMT. The mCIMT group wore a mitt for approximately 4 hours per day, 5 days a week, for 3 consecutive weeks. The mCIMT+Saebo group wore both the SaeboGlove and a mitt for the same duration.

Results: Part A: Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) showed that mCIMT+Saebo group scored 7.23 points higher (95% CI 1.93 to 12.53) than mCIMT group (P < 0.05). Hand grip strength (item 14 of WMFT) scored 3.29 points higher (95% CI 1.35 to 5.24) than in the mCIMT group (P < 0.01). Part B: The WMFT showed that mCIMT+Saebo group scored 5.45 points higher (95% CI 1.92 to 8.98) than the control group (P < 0.01). Hand grip strength was 2.66 points higher (95% CI 1.33 to 3.99) (P < 0.001), and ARAT was 10.75 points higher (95% CI 0.93 to 20.57) than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The SaeboGlove may enhance the therapeutic advantages of mCIMT and expand the inclusion criteria for CIMT.

动态腕手矫形器联合改良约束诱导运动疗法对急性和亚急性脑卒中患者上肢和手部功能的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:约束诱导运动疗法(CIMT)是一种得到大量基础研究支持的“康复策略”。然而,其临床实施往往受到患肢能力差的限制。目的:将mCIMT和SaeboGlove结合起来,为那些通常没有资格参加mCIMT培训的人提供帮助。方法:A部分:mCIMT+Saebo组(n = 18)和mCIMT组(n = 19)。B部分:mCIMT+Saebo组(n = 10)和对照组(n = 9)。两部分均为评估盲、双臂、平行组随机对照试验。在常规康复治疗的基础上,除对照组外,其余各组均行mCIMT治疗。mCIMT组每天戴手套约4小时,每周5天,连续3周。mCIMT+Saebo组戴SaeboGlove和手套的时间相同。结果:A部分Wolf运动功能测试(WMFT)显示,mCIMT+Saebo组比mCIMT组得分高7.23分(95% CI 1.93 ~ 12.53),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。握力(WMFT第14项)得分比mCIMT组高3.29分(95% CI 1.35 ~ 5.24) (P < 0.01)。B部分:WMFT显示,mCIMT+Saebo组得分比对照组高5.45分(95% CI 1.92 ~ 8.98),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。握力比对照组高2.66点(95% CI 1.33 ~ 3.99) (P < 0.001), ARAT比对照组高10.75点(95% CI 0.93 ~ 20.57) (P < 0.05)。结论:SaeboGlove可增强CIMT的治疗优势,扩大CIMT的纳入标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书