Association between chronic rhinosinusitis and obstructive sleep apnea: evidence from systematic review, meta-analysis, and Mendelian Randomization.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep and Biological Rhythms Pub Date : 2026-03-06 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s41105-026-00641-z
Jing-Hao Zhai, Lu-Lu Zhu, Shu-Qing Chen, Xian Jian, Chao Chen
{"title":"Association between chronic rhinosinusitis and obstructive sleep apnea: evidence from systematic review, meta-analysis, and Mendelian Randomization.","authors":"Jing-Hao Zhai, Lu-Lu Zhu, Shu-Qing Chen, Xian Jian, Chao Chen","doi":"10.1007/s41105-026-00641-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are common conditions that impair quality of life and are linked to adverse health outcomes. Evidence on their bidirectional association remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate the OSA-CRS relationship through systematic review, meta-analysis, and Mendelian Randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed 14 observational studies (30,509 participants) following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed in Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.4 to estimate pooled prevalence and risk ratios. Bidirectional two-sample MR used GWAS summary data, analyzed in R (v4.2.0) with the TwoSampleMR package; IVW was the primary method, complemented by MR-Egger and leave-one-out analyses to assess pleiotropy and robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observational studies indicate a bidirectional association between CRS and OSA, with CRS patients showing an increased risk of OSA, and OSA patients having a higher risk of developing CRS. Mendelian Randomization analysis, however, supports a unidirectional causal relationship, showing that CRS causally increases the risk of OSA, whereas there is no significant causal effect of OSA on CRS. Specifically, the meta-analysis revealed a 20% prevalence of OSA among CRS patients (95% CI: 19-21%) and an elevated risk of OSA in this group (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20). Patients with OSA exhibited a 5.8-fold higher risk of developing CRS (OR = 5.79, 95% CI: 1.61-20.80). Mendelian Randomization analysis confirmed the causal effect of CRS on OSA (IVW OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20, <i>p</i> = 0.008), while the reverse direction showed no significant association (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research data indicate bidirectional associations between OSA and CRS, but MR supports only a causal effect of CRS on OSA. These findings identify CRS as a modifiable risk factor for OSA, supporting targeted OSA screening in CRS populations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-026-00641-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":21896,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","volume":"24 2","pages":"183-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-026-00641-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are common conditions that impair quality of life and are linked to adverse health outcomes. Evidence on their bidirectional association remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate the OSA-CRS relationship through systematic review, meta-analysis, and Mendelian Randomization (MR).

Methods: We systematically reviewed 14 observational studies (30,509 participants) following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed in Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.4 to estimate pooled prevalence and risk ratios. Bidirectional two-sample MR used GWAS summary data, analyzed in R (v4.2.0) with the TwoSampleMR package; IVW was the primary method, complemented by MR-Egger and leave-one-out analyses to assess pleiotropy and robustness.

Results: Observational studies indicate a bidirectional association between CRS and OSA, with CRS patients showing an increased risk of OSA, and OSA patients having a higher risk of developing CRS. Mendelian Randomization analysis, however, supports a unidirectional causal relationship, showing that CRS causally increases the risk of OSA, whereas there is no significant causal effect of OSA on CRS. Specifically, the meta-analysis revealed a 20% prevalence of OSA among CRS patients (95% CI: 19-21%) and an elevated risk of OSA in this group (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20). Patients with OSA exhibited a 5.8-fold higher risk of developing CRS (OR = 5.79, 95% CI: 1.61-20.80). Mendelian Randomization analysis confirmed the causal effect of CRS on OSA (IVW OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20, p = 0.008), while the reverse direction showed no significant association (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.1).

Conclusion: Research data indicate bidirectional associations between OSA and CRS, but MR supports only a causal effect of CRS on OSA. These findings identify CRS as a modifiable risk factor for OSA, supporting targeted OSA screening in CRS populations.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-026-00641-z.

慢性鼻窦炎与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停之间的关系:来自系统评价、荟萃分析和孟德尔随机化的证据。
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)和慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是损害生活质量并与不良健康结果相关的常见疾病。他们的双向联系的证据仍然不一致。本研究旨在通过系统回顾、荟萃分析和孟德尔随机化(MR)来探讨osa与crs的关系。方法:我们系统地回顾了14项观察性研究(30509名受试者),遵循PRISMA和MOOSE指南。在Stata 15.0和Review Manager 5.4中进行meta分析,以估计合并患病率和风险比。双向双样本MR使用GWAS汇总数据,在R (v4.2.0)中使用TwoSampleMR软件包进行分析;IVW是主要方法,辅以MR-Egger和留一分析来评估多效性和稳健性。结果:观察性研究表明CRS与OSA存在双向关联,CRS患者发生OSA的风险增加,而OSA患者发生CRS的风险更高。然而,孟德尔随机化分析支持单向因果关系,表明CRS会导致OSA的风险增加,而OSA对CRS没有显著的因果影响。具体而言,荟萃分析显示,CRS患者中OSA患病率为20% (95% CI: 19-21%),该组OSA风险升高(OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20)。OSA患者发生CRS的风险高出5.8倍(OR = 5.79, 95% CI: 1.61-20.80)。孟德尔随机化分析证实了CRS与OSA的因果关系(IVW OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20, p = 0.008),而相反方向无显著相关性(OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.1)。结论:研究数据表明OSA与CRS之间存在双向关联,但MR仅支持CRS对OSA的因果关系。这些发现确定CRS是OSA的一个可改变的危险因素,支持在CRS人群中进行有针对性的OSA筛查。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s41105-026-00641-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep and Biological Rhythms
Sleep and Biological Rhythms 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sleep and Biological Rhythms is a quarterly peer-reviewed publication dealing with medical treatments relating to sleep. The journal publishies original articles, short papers, commentaries and the occasional reviews. In scope the journal covers mechanisms of sleep and wakefullness from the ranging perspectives of basic science, medicine, dentistry, pharmacology, psychology, engineering, public health and related branches of the social sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书