Untransmittable but unequal? Sexual wellbeing disparities in the context of PrEP and U=U.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexual health Pub Date : 2026-06-15 DOI:10.1071/SH25159
Thomas Norman, G J Melendez-Torres, Dean Murphy, Adam Bourne, Donna Sombrea, Jennifer Power
{"title":"Untransmittable but unequal? Sexual wellbeing disparities in the context of PrEP and U=U.","authors":"Thomas Norman, G J Melendez-Torres, Dean Murphy, Adam Bourne, Donna Sombrea, Jennifer Power","doi":"10.1071/SH25159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomedical prevention technologies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, treatment as prevention and the principle of Undetectable = Untransmittable, have transformed HIV care and opened new possibilities for enhancing the sexual wellbeing of people living with HIV. Yet, the psychosocial and relational benefits of these tools, particularly their impact on sexual wellbeing, remain underexplored, especially across diverse subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from 669 people living with HIV participating in a large-scale survey of people living with HIV in Australia, this study developed the Sexual Wellbeing through Biomedical Prevention scale, a five-item measure assessing sexual wellbeing (e.g. confidence, enjoyment) in the context of biomedical HIV prevention (score range 0-20; higher scores = greater wellbeing). ANOVA tests examined differences in Sexual Wellbeing through Biomedical Prevention scores across demographic, relational, psychosocial and health-related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis supported a single-factor structure. The mean Sexual Wellbeing through Biomedical Prevention score was moderate overall (M = 13.0), but varied significantly by gender, sexuality, relationship status, partner pre-exposure prophylaxis use, stigma and quality of life. Gay/queer men reported markedly higher scores than women and heterosexual participants. Higher scores were associated with partner pre-exposure prophylaxis use, reduced fear of transmission, and better self-reported health and quality of life. Participants who reported 'always' experiencing HIV-related stigma had significantly lower mean scores.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Biomedical advances have improved virological outcomes, but their sexual wellbeing benefits appear unevenly distributed. Targeted interventions that address stigma, strengthen HIV literacy and support sexual confidence, particularly among women and heterosexual people living with HIV, are essential to realising the full potential of biomedical prevention and advancing equity in wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biomedical prevention technologies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, treatment as prevention and the principle of Undetectable = Untransmittable, have transformed HIV care and opened new possibilities for enhancing the sexual wellbeing of people living with HIV. Yet, the psychosocial and relational benefits of these tools, particularly their impact on sexual wellbeing, remain underexplored, especially across diverse subpopulations.

Methods: Using data from 669 people living with HIV participating in a large-scale survey of people living with HIV in Australia, this study developed the Sexual Wellbeing through Biomedical Prevention scale, a five-item measure assessing sexual wellbeing (e.g. confidence, enjoyment) in the context of biomedical HIV prevention (score range 0-20; higher scores = greater wellbeing). ANOVA tests examined differences in Sexual Wellbeing through Biomedical Prevention scores across demographic, relational, psychosocial and health-related variables.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported a single-factor structure. The mean Sexual Wellbeing through Biomedical Prevention score was moderate overall (M = 13.0), but varied significantly by gender, sexuality, relationship status, partner pre-exposure prophylaxis use, stigma and quality of life. Gay/queer men reported markedly higher scores than women and heterosexual participants. Higher scores were associated with partner pre-exposure prophylaxis use, reduced fear of transmission, and better self-reported health and quality of life. Participants who reported 'always' experiencing HIV-related stigma had significantly lower mean scores.

Discussion: Biomedical advances have improved virological outcomes, but their sexual wellbeing benefits appear unevenly distributed. Targeted interventions that address stigma, strengthen HIV literacy and support sexual confidence, particularly among women and heterosexual people living with HIV, are essential to realising the full potential of biomedical prevention and advancing equity in wellbeing.

不能传播但不平等?PrEP和U=U背景下的性健康差异。
背景:生物医学预防技术,如接触前预防、治疗即预防和检测不到=无法传播的原则,改变了艾滋病毒护理,并为加强艾滋病毒感染者的性健康开辟了新的可能性。然而,这些工具的社会心理和关系效益,特别是它们对性健康的影响,仍未得到充分探索,特别是在不同的亚人群中。方法:本研究利用澳大利亚669名艾滋病毒感染者参与的大规模艾滋病毒感染者调查的数据,开发了通过生物医学预防的性健康量表,这是一项评估艾滋病毒生物医学预防背景下的性健康(如信心,享受)的五项措施(得分范围为0-20;得分越高=幸福感越高)。方差分析测试通过人口统计学、关系、社会心理和健康相关变量的生物医学预防得分来检验性健康的差异。结果:探索性因子分析支持单因素结构。通过生物医学预防的性幸福平均得分总体为中等水平(M = 13.0),但在性别、性行为、关系状况、伴侣暴露前预防使用、污名化和生活质量方面存在显著差异。同性恋/酷儿男性的得分明显高于女性和异性恋参与者。较高的得分与伴侣接触前预防措施的使用、对传播的恐惧减少以及自我报告的健康和生活质量更好有关。报告“总是”经历与艾滋病毒相关的耻辱的参与者的平均得分明显较低。讨论:生物医学的进步改善了病毒学的结果,但它们的性福利似乎分布不均。消除污名、加强艾滋病毒扫盲和支持性信心的有针对性的干预措施,特别是在感染艾滋病毒的妇女和异性恋者中,对于充分发挥生物医学预防的潜力和促进福祉方面的公平至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书