Remyelination and neuroprotection translational trials: Lessons from optic neuritis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
C Louapre, Y Beigneux, F Maestri, C Meyniel, V Touitou
{"title":"Remyelination and neuroprotection translational trials: Lessons from optic neuritis.","authors":"C Louapre, Y Beigneux, F Maestri, C Meyniel, V Touitou","doi":"10.1016/j.neurol.2026.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying treatments have reduced inflammatory activity but have limited impact on progressive neurodegeneration. In this context, remyelination and neuroprotection appear as key therapeutic goals. The visual pathway offers an attractive translational model, as optic neuritis recapitulates the demyelinating and neurodegenerative features of multiple sclerosis while providing accessible functional and structural readouts through visual evoked potentials and optical coherence tomography. Over the past two decades, several clinical trials have evaluated remyelinating and neuroprotective agents using optic neuritis as a model. However, so far, no phase 3 trial has met its primary endpoint for either indication. This review synthesises the preclinical rationale, clinical trial evidence, and methodological lessons from these studies. Key challenges include the timing of intervention, heterogeneity in baseline damage, variability of electrophysiological assessments, and uncertain clinical impact of surrogate markers. Addressing these limitations through refined trial design, outcome measure harmonisation, and combined therapeutic strategies will be essential for future translational success.</p>","PeriodicalId":21321,"journal":{"name":"Revue neurologique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue neurologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2026.03.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying treatments have reduced inflammatory activity but have limited impact on progressive neurodegeneration. In this context, remyelination and neuroprotection appear as key therapeutic goals. The visual pathway offers an attractive translational model, as optic neuritis recapitulates the demyelinating and neurodegenerative features of multiple sclerosis while providing accessible functional and structural readouts through visual evoked potentials and optical coherence tomography. Over the past two decades, several clinical trials have evaluated remyelinating and neuroprotective agents using optic neuritis as a model. However, so far, no phase 3 trial has met its primary endpoint for either indication. This review synthesises the preclinical rationale, clinical trial evidence, and methodological lessons from these studies. Key challenges include the timing of intervention, heterogeneity in baseline damage, variability of electrophysiological assessments, and uncertain clinical impact of surrogate markers. Addressing these limitations through refined trial design, outcome measure harmonisation, and combined therapeutic strategies will be essential for future translational success.

再髓鞘和神经保护转化试验:视神经炎的经验教训。
多发性硬化症疾病改善治疗减少了炎症活动,但对进行性神经变性的影响有限。在这种情况下,髓鞘再生和神经保护似乎是关键的治疗目标。视觉通路提供了一个有吸引力的转化模型,因为视神经炎概括了多发性硬化症的脱髓鞘和神经退行性特征,同时通过视觉诱发电位和光学相干断层扫描提供了可访问的功能和结构数据。在过去的二十年中,一些临床试验以视神经炎为模型评估了髓鞘再生和神经保护剂。然而,到目前为止,没有3期试验达到其主要终点。本综述综合了这些研究的临床前理论基础、临床试验证据和方法学经验教训。主要挑战包括干预的时机、基线损伤的异质性、电生理评估的可变性以及替代标记物的不确定临床影响。通过改进试验设计、结果测量协调和联合治疗策略来解决这些局限性对未来的转化成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revue neurologique
Revue neurologique 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
598
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The first issue of the Revue Neurologique, featuring an original article by Jean-Martin Charcot, was published on February 28th, 1893. Six years later, the French Society of Neurology (SFN) adopted this journal as its official publication in the year of its foundation, 1899. The Revue Neurologique was published throughout the 20th century without interruption and is indexed in all international databases (including Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus). Ten annual issues provide original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, and review articles giving up-to-date insights in all areas of neurology. The Revue Neurologique also publishes guidelines and recommendations. The Revue Neurologique publishes original articles, brief reports, general reviews, editorials, and letters to the editor as well as correspondence concerning articles previously published in the journal in the correspondence column.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书