Diagnostic performance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in excluding systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lupus Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1177/09612033261442792
Yu-Chi Hung, Pao-Feng Hsieh, Kuang-Hui Yu
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in excluding systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yu-Chi Hung, Pao-Feng Hsieh, Kuang-Hui Yu","doi":"10.1177/09612033261442792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesAnti-dense fine speckled 70 (anti-DFS70) antibodies have been reported to be more prevalent in healthy individuals (HI) than in patients with autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, subsequent studies have yielded inconsistent findings. The reliability of anti-DFS70 antibodies as exclusionary markers for SLE remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.MethodsSixteen studies investigating 6092 subjects (2427 SLE patients and 3665 healthy individuals) were included in the analysis. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of anti-DFS70 antibodies for determining their utility in excluding SLE in the general population.ResultsIn SLE patients, the prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies was 10.1% (244/2427; 95% CI: 5.7-14.5%), which was not significantly higher than that of HI, at 5.8% (212/3665; 95% CI: 2.9-8.7%). The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and DOR of anti-DFS70 antibodies for the exclusion of SLE were 0.10 (95% CI: 0.09-0.11), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95), 1.04 (95% CI: 0.59-1.85), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.28-0.90), indicating that the test results of anti-DFS70 antibodies have similar distributions in SLE patients and HI. Regarding monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies in SLE, three studies involving 385 patients with SLE and 648 healthy individuals found these antibodies in 0.8% (3 out of 385) of SLE patients, compared to 6.6% (43 out of 648) of healthy individuals. The corresponding DOR for excluding an SLE diagnosis was 4.00 (95% CI: 1.39-11.46).ConclusionsWhile the present study corroborates findings that the frequency of anti-DFS70 antibodies is slightly higher in SLE patients (10.1%, 244 out of 2427), the lack of statistical significance underscores the need for more comprehensive studies to draw definitive conclusions for the exclusion of SLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"800-809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033261442792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesAnti-dense fine speckled 70 (anti-DFS70) antibodies have been reported to be more prevalent in healthy individuals (HI) than in patients with autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, subsequent studies have yielded inconsistent findings. The reliability of anti-DFS70 antibodies as exclusionary markers for SLE remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.MethodsSixteen studies investigating 6092 subjects (2427 SLE patients and 3665 healthy individuals) were included in the analysis. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of anti-DFS70 antibodies for determining their utility in excluding SLE in the general population.ResultsIn SLE patients, the prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies was 10.1% (244/2427; 95% CI: 5.7-14.5%), which was not significantly higher than that of HI, at 5.8% (212/3665; 95% CI: 2.9-8.7%). The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and DOR of anti-DFS70 antibodies for the exclusion of SLE were 0.10 (95% CI: 0.09-0.11), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95), 1.04 (95% CI: 0.59-1.85), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.28-0.90), indicating that the test results of anti-DFS70 antibodies have similar distributions in SLE patients and HI. Regarding monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies in SLE, three studies involving 385 patients with SLE and 648 healthy individuals found these antibodies in 0.8% (3 out of 385) of SLE patients, compared to 6.6% (43 out of 648) of healthy individuals. The corresponding DOR for excluding an SLE diagnosis was 4.00 (95% CI: 1.39-11.46).ConclusionsWhile the present study corroborates findings that the frequency of anti-DFS70 antibodies is slightly higher in SLE patients (10.1%, 244 out of 2427), the lack of statistical significance underscores the need for more comprehensive studies to draw definitive conclusions for the exclusion of SLE.

抗dfs70抗体在排除系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的诊断性能:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
据报道,抗致密细斑70(抗dfs70)抗体在健康个体(HI)中比在自身免疫性疾病(包括系统性红斑狼疮(SLE))患者中更普遍。然而,随后的研究得出了不一致的结果。抗dfs70抗体作为SLE排他性标志物的可靠性仍不确定,需要进一步研究。方法纳入16项研究,共6092例受试者(SLE患者2427例,健康人群3665例)。进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估和比较抗dfs70抗体的敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比(DOR),以确定其在一般人群中排除SLE的效用。结果SLE患者中,抗dfs70抗体的患病率为10.1% (244/2427;95% CI: 5.7-14.5%),与HI的5.8% (221 /3665;95% CI: 2.9-8.7%)相比,差异无统计学意义。抗dfs70抗体排除SLE的总敏感性、特异性和DOR分别为0.10 (95% CI: 0.09-0.11)、0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95)、1.04 (95% CI: 0.59-1.85)。SROC曲线下面积为0.58 (95% CI: 0.28-0.90),说明抗dfs70抗体检测结果在SLE患者和HI患者中具有相似的分布。关于SLE的单特异性抗dfs70抗体,三项涉及385例SLE患者和648名健康个体的研究发现,这些抗体在0.8%的SLE患者(385例中有3例)中出现,而在健康个体中为6.6%(648例中有43例)。排除SLE诊断的相应DOR为4.00 (95% CI: 1.39-11.46)。虽然本研究证实了SLE患者中抗dfs70抗体的频率略高(10.1%,2427人中有244人),但缺乏统计学意义强调了需要更全面的研究来得出排除SLE的明确结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus
Lupus 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书