Disambiguating Tolerance of Ambiguity: Introducing the MAAS-9 as a Short, Reliable, and Multidimensional Measure of Attitudes Toward Ambiguity.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Diana Steger, Astrid Schütz
{"title":"Disambiguating Tolerance of Ambiguity: Introducing the MAAS-9 as a Short, Reliable, and Multidimensional Measure of Attitudes Toward Ambiguity.","authors":"Diana Steger, Astrid Schütz","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2645707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the concept of tolerance of ambiguity has been studied for the past 75 years, it seems more relevant than ever with the rapidly changing political and social landscape of these days. However, the literature remains marked by substantial challenges, particularly with respect to the operationalization of tolerance of ambiguity. Building on the multidimensional framework proposed by Lauriola et al., we conceptualize tolerance of ambiguity as an umbrella concept that includes moral absolutism, need for complexity, and discomfort with ambiguity. We present the MAAS-9, a 9-item short scale that allows for a psychometrically sound assessment of these dimensions. Against this backdrop we suggest that prior challenges in the operationalization may partly reflect issues of item-sampling. We further examine associations with personality constructs, mental health (e.g., well-being or chronic stress) and political aspects (e.g., political orientation, conspiracy mentality, or racism), illustrating the differentiated nomological patterns of the three dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2645707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the concept of tolerance of ambiguity has been studied for the past 75 years, it seems more relevant than ever with the rapidly changing political and social landscape of these days. However, the literature remains marked by substantial challenges, particularly with respect to the operationalization of tolerance of ambiguity. Building on the multidimensional framework proposed by Lauriola et al., we conceptualize tolerance of ambiguity as an umbrella concept that includes moral absolutism, need for complexity, and discomfort with ambiguity. We present the MAAS-9, a 9-item short scale that allows for a psychometrically sound assessment of these dimensions. Against this backdrop we suggest that prior challenges in the operationalization may partly reflect issues of item-sampling. We further examine associations with personality constructs, mental health (e.g., well-being or chronic stress) and political aspects (e.g., political orientation, conspiracy mentality, or racism), illustrating the differentiated nomological patterns of the three dimensions.

消歧义容忍度:引入MAAS-9作为对歧义态度的一种简短、可靠和多维的测量。
尽管在过去的75年里,人们一直在研究容忍歧义的概念,但它似乎比以往任何时候都更符合当今迅速变化的政治和社会格局。然而,文献仍然面临着巨大的挑战,特别是在对歧义容忍的操作化方面。在Lauriola等人提出的多维框架的基础上,我们将对模糊性的容忍概念化为一个伞形概念,其中包括道德绝对主义、对复杂性的需求和对模糊性的不适。我们提出了MAAS-9,一个9项短量表,允许对这些维度进行心理测量学上的合理评估。在此背景下,我们建议在操作化之前的挑战可能部分反映了项目抽样的问题。我们进一步研究了与人格结构、心理健康(如幸福感或慢性压力)和政治方面(如政治取向、阴谋心态或种族主义)的关联,说明了三个维度的不同法则模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书