Development of a Workplace Health Initiatives Checklist for Women and its cross-sectional associations with burnout, productivity, and satisfaction.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Haruna Ushigome, Songee Jung, Masahiro Iwakura, Mayumi Tsuji, Miho Iida, Yuko Mitsuhashi, Michiko Nohara, Kanae Karita, Megumi Kawashima, Youhwi Song, Kyoko Adachi, Yoshihisa Horiuchi, Satori Nagai, Yoko Araki, Kaori Koga, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Kyoko Nomura
{"title":"Development of a Workplace Health Initiatives Checklist for Women and its cross-sectional associations with burnout, productivity, and satisfaction.","authors":"Haruna Ushigome, Songee Jung, Masahiro Iwakura, Mayumi Tsuji, Miho Iida, Yuko Mitsuhashi, Michiko Nohara, Kanae Karita, Megumi Kawashima, Youhwi Song, Kyoko Adachi, Yoshihisa Horiuchi, Satori Nagai, Yoko Araki, Kaori Koga, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Kyoko Nomura","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiag018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a Workplace Health Initiatives Checklist for Women (WHIC‑W), we assessed content validity (expert) and provided initial evidence for construct validity by examining hypothesized cross-sectional associations with burnout, productivity, and job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary expert panel comprising gynecologists, occupational physicians, nurses, industrial hygienists, and psychosomatic specialists created 26 items for the WHIC‑W. A survey was conducted in October 2023 with 3343 working women aged 20-69 years. The checklist includes 2 domains: Domain 1 (15 items on work environment) and Domain 2 (11 items on pregnancy, child/elderly care, and support for balancing illness and work). The outcome included the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, work productivity using presenteeism (WHO Health and Work Performance Questionnaire) and absenteeism (health-related days off in the past 28 days), satisfaction rated on a visual analog scale (0-10), and intention to resign over the past year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The checklist was scored on a 26-point scale, with a median score of 3 (interquartile range: 1-9), indicating limited workplace support for women. Higher checklist total scores were associated with lower personal burnout (β = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.435 to -0.196), work-related burnout (β = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.395 to -0.207), and client-related burnout (β = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.276 to -0.065), and higher absolute presenteeism (β = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.336-0.516; higher score = less performance loss), absenteeism (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.001-1.021), and satisfaction (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.055-1.079).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary construct validity evidence supporting WHIC-W as a formative checklist, with higher scores showing hypothesized cross-sectional associations with lower burnout, better productivity, and job satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13220333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiag018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a Workplace Health Initiatives Checklist for Women (WHIC‑W), we assessed content validity (expert) and provided initial evidence for construct validity by examining hypothesized cross-sectional associations with burnout, productivity, and job satisfaction.

Methods: A multidisciplinary expert panel comprising gynecologists, occupational physicians, nurses, industrial hygienists, and psychosomatic specialists created 26 items for the WHIC‑W. A survey was conducted in October 2023 with 3343 working women aged 20-69 years. The checklist includes 2 domains: Domain 1 (15 items on work environment) and Domain 2 (11 items on pregnancy, child/elderly care, and support for balancing illness and work). The outcome included the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, work productivity using presenteeism (WHO Health and Work Performance Questionnaire) and absenteeism (health-related days off in the past 28 days), satisfaction rated on a visual analog scale (0-10), and intention to resign over the past year.

Results: The checklist was scored on a 26-point scale, with a median score of 3 (interquartile range: 1-9), indicating limited workplace support for women. Higher checklist total scores were associated with lower personal burnout (β = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.435 to -0.196), work-related burnout (β = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.395 to -0.207), and client-related burnout (β = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.276 to -0.065), and higher absolute presenteeism (β = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.336-0.516; higher score = less performance loss), absenteeism (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.001-1.021), and satisfaction (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.055-1.079).

Conclusions: This study provides preliminary construct validity evidence supporting WHIC-W as a formative checklist, with higher scores showing hypothesized cross-sectional associations with lower burnout, better productivity, and job satisfaction.

妇女工作场所健康倡议清单的制定及其与职业倦怠、生产力和满意度的横断面关联
目的:为了开发女性工作场所健康倡议清单(WHIC - W),我们评估了内容效度(专家),并通过检查与职业倦怠、生产力和工作满意度的假设横断面关联,为结构效度提供了初步证据。方法:由妇科医生、职业医生、护士、工业卫生学家和心身专家组成的多学科专家小组为WHIC‑W创建了26个项目。2023年10月对3343名20-69岁的职业女性进行了一项调查。该清单包括两个领域:领域1(15项关于工作环境的内容)和领域2(11项关于怀孕、儿童/老人护理以及平衡疾病和工作的支持)。结果包括哥本哈根倦怠量表、使用出勤率(世卫组织健康和工作绩效问卷)和缺勤率(过去28天内与健康有关的休假)的工作效率、视觉模拟量表(0-10)的满意度以及过去一年的辞职意向。结果:这份清单的得分为26分,中位数为3分(IQR: 1-9),表明工作场所对女性的支持有限。较高的检查表总分与较低的个人倦怠(β -0.32, 95% CI: -0.435, -0.196)、与工作相关的倦怠(β -0.30, 95% CI: -0.395, -0.207)、与客户相关的倦怠(β -0.17, 95% CI: -0.276, -0.065)、较高的绝对出勤率(β 0.43, 95% CI: 0.336, 0.516)、缺勤率(OR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.001, 1.021)和满意度(OR 1.07, 95% CI: 1.055, 1.079)相关。结论:本研究提供了初步的结构效度证据,支持WHIC-W作为一个形成性检查表,较高的分数显示了假设的横截面关联,较低的倦怠,较高的生产力和工作满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书