Phase-Specific Electroencephalography Monitoring: A Dynamic Approach to Predict Postoperative Delirium During Aortic Surgery.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Young Song, Hye S Lee, Dong W Han, Sujung Park, Sang B Nam, Hyejin Yang, Jayyoung Bae
{"title":"Phase-Specific Electroencephalography Monitoring: A Dynamic Approach to Predict Postoperative Delirium During Aortic Surgery.","authors":"Young Song, Hye S Lee, Dong W Han, Sujung Park, Sang B Nam, Hyejin Yang, Jayyoung Bae","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Static or averaged electroencephalography (EEG) metrics may fail to capture dynamic cerebral changes during surgery. We assessed the EEG features during aortic arch surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and total circulatory arrest (TCA) to identify key EEG predictors of postoperative delirium (POD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed intraoperative EEG data from 233 patients across 5 phases: pre-CPB, CPB initiation, TCA, post-TCA, and post-CPB. The predictive potential of EEG parameters was assessed using logistic regression, and phase-specific nomogram models were developed. The primary analysis included emergency cases; elective cases were included in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POD occurred in 78 patients (44.8%). Phase-specific models showed high predictive performance. Independent predictors of POD included reduced alpha power during the post-CPB phase (odds ratio [OR]=0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.87, P<0.001) and lower delta power during TCA (OR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96, P=0.031). In addition, elevated BSR during CPB initiation (OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.89, P<0.001) and post-TCA (OR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.11-1.70, P=0.008) predicted increased POD incidence. A similar, but nonsignificant, observation for alpha power was observed during the pre-CPB phase (P=0.103). Calibration plots showed strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phase-specific EEG monitoring reliably predicted POD during aortic arch surgery. Predictive factors varied across intraoperative phases, underscoring the dynamic sensitivity of EEG to physiological changes. Comprehensive, phase-specific EEG assessment may improve risk stratification and perioperative management, though large prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Static or averaged electroencephalography (EEG) metrics may fail to capture dynamic cerebral changes during surgery. We assessed the EEG features during aortic arch surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and total circulatory arrest (TCA) to identify key EEG predictors of postoperative delirium (POD).

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed intraoperative EEG data from 233 patients across 5 phases: pre-CPB, CPB initiation, TCA, post-TCA, and post-CPB. The predictive potential of EEG parameters was assessed using logistic regression, and phase-specific nomogram models were developed. The primary analysis included emergency cases; elective cases were included in sensitivity analyses.

Results: POD occurred in 78 patients (44.8%). Phase-specific models showed high predictive performance. Independent predictors of POD included reduced alpha power during the post-CPB phase (odds ratio [OR]=0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.87, P<0.001) and lower delta power during TCA (OR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96, P=0.031). In addition, elevated BSR during CPB initiation (OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.89, P<0.001) and post-TCA (OR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.11-1.70, P=0.008) predicted increased POD incidence. A similar, but nonsignificant, observation for alpha power was observed during the pre-CPB phase (P=0.103). Calibration plots showed strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes.

Conclusions: Phase-specific EEG monitoring reliably predicted POD during aortic arch surgery. Predictive factors varied across intraoperative phases, underscoring the dynamic sensitivity of EEG to physiological changes. Comprehensive, phase-specific EEG assessment may improve risk stratification and perioperative management, though large prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

阶段特异性脑电图监测:预测主动脉手术术后谵妄的动态方法。
背景:静态或平均脑电图(EEG)指标可能无法捕捉手术期间大脑的动态变化。我们评估主动脉弓手术合并体外循环(CPB)和全循环骤停(TCA)期间的脑电图特征,以确定术后谵妄(POD)的关键脑电图预测因子。方法:回顾性分析233例患者术中脑电图数据,分为5个阶段:CPB前、CPB启动、TCA、TCA后和CPB后。采用逻辑回归方法评估脑电参数的预测潜力,并建立了特定相位的nomogram模型。初步分析包括急诊病例;选择性病例纳入敏感性分析。结果:发生POD 78例(44.8%)。阶段特定模型具有较高的预测性能。POD的独立预测因子包括cpb后阶段α功率降低(比值比[OR]=0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.87)。结论:阶段特异性脑电图监测可靠地预测主动脉弓手术期间POD。预测因素在术中各阶段有所不同,强调了脑电图对生理变化的动态敏感性。全面的、特定阶段的脑电图评估可以改善风险分层和围手术期管理,尽管需要大量的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书