The impact of a personalized sleep & nutrition intervention in shift workers: improved subjective sleep without objective changes.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Maaike VAN DER Rhee, Johanneke E Oosterman, Suzan Wopereis, Inês Chaves, Martijn E T Dollé, Alex Burdorf, Linda W M VAN Kerkhof, Heidi M Lammers-VAN DER Holst
{"title":"The impact of a personalized sleep & nutrition intervention in shift workers: improved subjective sleep without objective changes.","authors":"Maaike VAN DER Rhee, Johanneke E Oosterman, Suzan Wopereis, Inês Chaves, Martijn E T Dollé, Alex Burdorf, Linda W M VAN Kerkhof, Heidi M Lammers-VAN DER Holst","doi":"10.2486/indhealth.2025-0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effects of a personalized sleep or nutrition intervention on sleep in shift-workers. Fifty-seven healthy male workers on 12-hour shifts received the sleep intervention (n=25), nutrition intervention (n=22), or control (n=10). The sleep intervention aimed to improve sleep duration and quality through adjustments in sleep timing and sleep education. The nutrition intervention targeted circadian alignment by structuring meal timing and macronutrient distribution. Interventions were personalized using baseline sleep, diet, and physiological markers. Subjective sleep was assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index at baseline, last weeks of the intervention, and 8-month follow-up. Objective sleep outcomes (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, fragmentation index, and wake after sleep onset) were assessed through actigraphy at baseline, first and last weeks of the intervention. Mixed-effects models analyzed changes in subjective and objective sleep outcomes, adjusting for age, chronotype and household composition. The sleep intervention group had significantly higher insomnia scores at baseline, which improved to control levels post-intervention and remained so at follow-up. However, no significant changes in objective sleep were observed. The nutrition intervention group showed no significant effects on subjective or objective sleep outcomes. These findings suggest personalized sleep strategies may improve perceived sleep without detectable changes in objective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13531,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2025-0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effects of a personalized sleep or nutrition intervention on sleep in shift-workers. Fifty-seven healthy male workers on 12-hour shifts received the sleep intervention (n=25), nutrition intervention (n=22), or control (n=10). The sleep intervention aimed to improve sleep duration and quality through adjustments in sleep timing and sleep education. The nutrition intervention targeted circadian alignment by structuring meal timing and macronutrient distribution. Interventions were personalized using baseline sleep, diet, and physiological markers. Subjective sleep was assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index at baseline, last weeks of the intervention, and 8-month follow-up. Objective sleep outcomes (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, fragmentation index, and wake after sleep onset) were assessed through actigraphy at baseline, first and last weeks of the intervention. Mixed-effects models analyzed changes in subjective and objective sleep outcomes, adjusting for age, chronotype and household composition. The sleep intervention group had significantly higher insomnia scores at baseline, which improved to control levels post-intervention and remained so at follow-up. However, no significant changes in objective sleep were observed. The nutrition intervention group showed no significant effects on subjective or objective sleep outcomes. These findings suggest personalized sleep strategies may improve perceived sleep without detectable changes in objective measures.

个性化睡眠与营养干预对倒班工人的影响:改善主观睡眠,但不改变客观。
本研究考察了个性化睡眠或营养干预对倒班工人睡眠的影响。57名12小时轮班的健康男性工人接受了睡眠干预(n=25)、营养干预(n=22)或对照组(n=10)。睡眠干预旨在通过调整睡眠时间和睡眠教育来改善睡眠时间和质量。营养干预通过调整膳食时间和常量营养素分布来瞄准昼夜节律。使用基线睡眠、饮食和生理指标进行个性化干预。在基线、干预的最后几周和8个月的随访时,用失眠症严重程度指数评估主观睡眠。客观睡眠结果(总睡眠时间、睡眠效率、碎片指数和睡眠开始后的清醒情况)通过活动记录仪在基线、干预的第一周和最后一周进行评估。混合效应模型分析了主观和客观睡眠结果的变化,调整了年龄、睡眠类型和家庭组成。睡眠干预组的失眠得分在基线时明显较高,干预后改善到控制水平,并在随访中保持不变。然而,客观睡眠没有明显变化。营养干预组对主观或客观睡眠结果没有显著影响。这些发现表明,个性化的睡眠策略可以在不改变客观测量的情况下改善感知睡眠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industrial Health
Industrial Health 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH covers all aspects of occupational medicine, ergonomics, industrial hygiene, engineering, safety and policy sciences. The journal helps promote solutions for the control and improvement of working conditions, and for the application of valuable research findings to the actual working environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书