{"title":"Gender bias of the general public regarding sexual victimization: a study using case vignettes in Japan.","authors":"Kyoko Odawara, Misari Oe, Tetsuya Ishida, Hiromi Chiba, Michiko Matsuoka, Emelie L Miller, Motohiro Ozone","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2650092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> From a victim support perspective, researching public perceptions of sexual violence is critically important, since these perceptions can influence judicial decisions and media coverage. However, a few studies have examined the public awareness of the gender bias in the perpetrator-victim relationships.<b>Objective:</b> We conducted a survey to investigate whether the general public in Japan perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrators and victims.<b>Methods:</b> We surveyed 137 members of the Japanese general public aged ≥18 years (48 men, 89 women, aged 19-73 years). Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey describing four short case vignettes with four different gender patterns regarding the perpetrator and victim of sexual violence. Participants were asked to rate the psychological impact on the victim in each vignette and to indicate whether the victim would be considered having experienced psychological trauma, and whether the victim could have escaped without being victimized.<b>Results:</b> Participants' responses showed that they regarded the 'man perpetrator-woman victim' situation as having the greatest psychological impact. When the perpetrators were women, the participants described lower psychological impacts.<b>Conclusions:</b> These results revealed that the general public perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrator and victim, especially when the perpetrator is a woman.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2650092"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13078649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2650092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: From a victim support perspective, researching public perceptions of sexual violence is critically important, since these perceptions can influence judicial decisions and media coverage. However, a few studies have examined the public awareness of the gender bias in the perpetrator-victim relationships.Objective: We conducted a survey to investigate whether the general public in Japan perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrators and victims.Methods: We surveyed 137 members of the Japanese general public aged ≥18 years (48 men, 89 women, aged 19-73 years). Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey describing four short case vignettes with four different gender patterns regarding the perpetrator and victim of sexual violence. Participants were asked to rate the psychological impact on the victim in each vignette and to indicate whether the victim would be considered having experienced psychological trauma, and whether the victim could have escaped without being victimized.Results: Participants' responses showed that they regarded the 'man perpetrator-woman victim' situation as having the greatest psychological impact. When the perpetrators were women, the participants described lower psychological impacts.Conclusions: These results revealed that the general public perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrator and victim, especially when the perpetrator is a woman.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.