Gender bias of the general public regarding sexual victimization: a study using case vignettes in Japan.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kyoko Odawara, Misari Oe, Tetsuya Ishida, Hiromi Chiba, Michiko Matsuoka, Emelie L Miller, Motohiro Ozone
{"title":"Gender bias of the general public regarding sexual victimization: a study using case vignettes in Japan.","authors":"Kyoko Odawara, Misari Oe, Tetsuya Ishida, Hiromi Chiba, Michiko Matsuoka, Emelie L Miller, Motohiro Ozone","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2650092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> From a victim support perspective, researching public perceptions of sexual violence is critically important, since these perceptions can influence judicial decisions and media coverage. However, a few studies have examined the public awareness of the gender bias in the perpetrator-victim relationships.<b>Objective:</b> We conducted a survey to investigate whether the general public in Japan perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrators and victims.<b>Methods:</b> We surveyed 137 members of the Japanese general public aged ≥18 years (48 men, 89 women, aged 19-73 years). Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey describing four short case vignettes with four different gender patterns regarding the perpetrator and victim of sexual violence. Participants were asked to rate the psychological impact on the victim in each vignette and to indicate whether the victim would be considered having experienced psychological trauma, and whether the victim could have escaped without being victimized.<b>Results:</b> Participants' responses showed that they regarded the 'man perpetrator-woman victim' situation as having the greatest psychological impact. When the perpetrators were women, the participants described lower psychological impacts.<b>Conclusions:</b> These results revealed that the general public perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrator and victim, especially when the perpetrator is a woman.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2650092"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13078649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2650092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: From a victim support perspective, researching public perceptions of sexual violence is critically important, since these perceptions can influence judicial decisions and media coverage. However, a few studies have examined the public awareness of the gender bias in the perpetrator-victim relationships.Objective: We conducted a survey to investigate whether the general public in Japan perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrators and victims.Methods: We surveyed 137 members of the Japanese general public aged ≥18 years (48 men, 89 women, aged 19-73 years). Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey describing four short case vignettes with four different gender patterns regarding the perpetrator and victim of sexual violence. Participants were asked to rate the psychological impact on the victim in each vignette and to indicate whether the victim would be considered having experienced psychological trauma, and whether the victim could have escaped without being victimized.Results: Participants' responses showed that they regarded the 'man perpetrator-woman victim' situation as having the greatest psychological impact. When the perpetrators were women, the participants described lower psychological impacts.Conclusions: These results revealed that the general public perceives sexual violence differently depending on the genders of the perpetrator and victim, especially when the perpetrator is a woman.

大众对性侵害的性别偏见:日本个案研究。
背景:从受害者支持的角度来看,研究公众对性暴力的看法至关重要,因为这些看法会影响司法决定和媒体报道。然而,一些研究调查了公众对加害者-受害者关系中性别偏见的认识。目的:我们进行了一项调查,调查日本普通公众对性暴力的看法是否因施暴者和受害者的性别而不同。方法:我们调查了137名年龄≥18岁的日本普通民众(男性48人,女性89人,年龄19-73岁)。参与者完成了一项横断面在线调查,描述了四个关于性暴力肇事者和受害者的四种不同性别模式的简短案例。参与者被要求评价每个小插曲对受害者的心理影响,并指出受害者是否会被认为经历了心理创伤,以及受害者是否可以逃脱而不成为受害者。结果:参与者的反应显示,他们认为“男性加害者-女性受害者”的情况有最大的心理影响。当肇事者是女性时,参与者描述的心理影响较低。结论:这些结果表明,普通公众对性暴力的认知因施暴者和受害者的性别而异,尤其是当施暴者是女性时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书