Revisiting the Governance-Dividend Nexus: The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.167892.3
Riffat Shaheen, Hussaini Bala, Ahmad Haruna Abubakar, Supriya Lamba Sahdev, Armaya'u Alhaji Sani, Ghousia Khatoon, Umair Zahid
{"title":"Revisiting the Governance-Dividend Nexus: The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility.","authors":"Riffat Shaheen, Hussaini Bala, Ahmad Haruna Abubakar, Supriya Lamba Sahdev, Armaya'u Alhaji Sani, Ghousia Khatoon, Umair Zahid","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.167892.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite plentiful research on the link between corporate governance (CG) and dividend policy, the mediating impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the CG -dividend policy link remains unexplored. This study investigates the mediating impact of CSR on the CG -dividend policy link, and explores the mechanism through which CSR mediates this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firms listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges are considered as a study sample. The data collection period ranged from 2012 to 2021. The final sample included 15,800 firm-year observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results findings indicate that firms with strong CG tend to pay low dividends, consistent with the substitution hypothesis, in which dividends and CG act as substitutes for each other. In addition to establishing a direct link between CG and dividend policy, our study significantly contributes to the extant literature by presenting both theoretical proposition and empirical evidence on the mediation effect of CSR in the above-mentioned relationship. We find that CSR mediates the corporate governance- dividend policy relationship, which implies that in comparison to corporate governance, CSR has a more dominating impact on firms' dividend policy decisions, and better-governed firms are more likely to engage in CSR activities to protect their stakeholders; consequently, they prefer to hold or invest cash instead of paying dividends because CSR engagements lower the cost of equity capital. These findings were corroborated by a set of robustness tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results have several implications for firms, regulators, and investors. Firms can use high dividend payouts to compensate for poor investor protection and to maintain good relationships with investors. When making investment decisions, investors are advised to consider socially responsible firms because of their strong CG structure. Finally, policy makers should give special consideration to CSR in order to reduce environmental and social problems and to enhance the related standards to ensure the safety and security of all stakeholders and hence reduce global accusation and pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"886"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.167892.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite plentiful research on the link between corporate governance (CG) and dividend policy, the mediating impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the CG -dividend policy link remains unexplored. This study investigates the mediating impact of CSR on the CG -dividend policy link, and explores the mechanism through which CSR mediates this relationship.

Methods: Firms listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges are considered as a study sample. The data collection period ranged from 2012 to 2021. The final sample included 15,800 firm-year observations.

Results: The results findings indicate that firms with strong CG tend to pay low dividends, consistent with the substitution hypothesis, in which dividends and CG act as substitutes for each other. In addition to establishing a direct link between CG and dividend policy, our study significantly contributes to the extant literature by presenting both theoretical proposition and empirical evidence on the mediation effect of CSR in the above-mentioned relationship. We find that CSR mediates the corporate governance- dividend policy relationship, which implies that in comparison to corporate governance, CSR has a more dominating impact on firms' dividend policy decisions, and better-governed firms are more likely to engage in CSR activities to protect their stakeholders; consequently, they prefer to hold or invest cash instead of paying dividends because CSR engagements lower the cost of equity capital. These findings were corroborated by a set of robustness tests.

Conclusions: Our results have several implications for firms, regulators, and investors. Firms can use high dividend payouts to compensate for poor investor protection and to maintain good relationships with investors. When making investment decisions, investors are advised to consider socially responsible firms because of their strong CG structure. Finally, policy makers should give special consideration to CSR in order to reduce environmental and social problems and to enhance the related standards to ensure the safety and security of all stakeholders and hence reduce global accusation and pressure.

公司社会责任的中介作用:公司治理与股利关系的再审视。
背景:尽管对公司治理与股利政策之间的联系进行了大量研究,但企业社会责任在公司治理与股利政策之间的中介作用尚未得到探索。本研究考察了企业社会责任对企业社会责任-股利政策关系的中介作用,并探讨了企业社会责任在这一关系中的中介作用机制。方法:以沪深两市上市公司为研究样本。数据收集期为2012年至2021年。最后的样本包括15800个公司年的观察结果。结果:研究结果表明,企业企业管理能力强的企业倾向于支付较低的股利,这符合股利与企业管理能力相互替代的假设。除了建立企业社会责任与股利政策之间的直接联系外,我们的研究还通过提出企业社会责任在上述关系中的中介作用的理论命题和实证证据,对现有文献做出了重大贡献。我们发现企业社会责任在公司治理-股利政策关系中起中介作用,这意味着相对于公司治理而言,企业社会责任对企业股利政策决策的影响更为主导,治理水平较高的企业更有可能参与企业社会责任活动以保护其利益相关者;因此,他们更愿意持有或投资现金,而不是支付股息,因为企业社会责任活动降低了股权资本的成本。这些发现得到了一组稳健性测试的证实。结论:我们的研究结果对公司、监管机构和投资者有几点启示。公司可以利用高股息支付来弥补投资者保护不力的问题,并与投资者保持良好的关系。在做出投资决策时,建议投资者考虑具有社会责任的公司,因为它们具有强大的CG结构。最后,决策者应该特别考虑企业社会责任,以减少环境和社会问题,并提高相关标准,以确保所有利益相关者的安全,从而减少全球指责和压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书