Models of multidisciplinary team-based care involving optometrists in Australia and New Zealand: narrative review and synthesis of implementation issues.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Optometry Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1080/08164622.2026.2624750
Jessie Huang-Lung, Sheela Kumaran, Philip Rk Turnbull, Ann L Webber, Joel Rhee, Margo Barr, Jacqueline Ramke, Lisa J Keay
{"title":"Models of multidisciplinary team-based care involving optometrists in Australia and New Zealand: narrative review and synthesis of implementation issues.","authors":"Jessie Huang-Lung, Sheela Kumaran, Philip Rk Turnbull, Ann L Webber, Joel Rhee, Margo Barr, Jacqueline Ramke, Lisa J Keay","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2026.2624750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>There is potential to expand the number of collaborative care and multidisciplinary team-based care models that optometrists are involved in, working at full scope to deliver high quality patient care. Ongoing work to generate research evidence, change policy and secure long-term funding is needed to support implementation.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of new models of multidisciplinary team-based care or collaborative care can support quality healthcare delivery and the sustainability of future health systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review synthesises research on models of multidisciplinary team-based care or collaborative care that involve optometrists in Australia and New Zealand. Outcomes related to patient health and experience, health service delivery including costs, and practitioner experience including workforce satisfaction were extracted from published evaluations. Additionally, barriers and facilitating factors to implementation were synthesised from identified studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 12 models of care were identified, most were task shifting or task sharing models between optometry and hospital-based ophthalmology for managing eye conditions. These collaborative models were developed to address long waiting lists for hospital-based ophthalmology services, and their implementation resulted in a corresponding decrease in waiting times for appointments. However, patient health outcomes, patient, and practitioner experiences were seldom reported. In primary care settings, models of multidisciplinary team-based care (<i>n</i> =3) were generally well-received by patients and practitioners. However, more objective measures may help quantify the social and economic benefits of these models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the impetus for multidisciplinary team-based care, barriers to wider implementation persist. Implementation science can help identify strategies to overcome barriers to adopting evidence-based models of care. Future studies should incorporate economic evaluations, to inform advocacy and policy, to generate system-level change that support health organisations to deliver multidisciplinary team-based care. Finally, future work should consider embedding the patient perspective from outset to ensure that models of care are people-centred.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1239-1253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2026.2624750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical relevance: There is potential to expand the number of collaborative care and multidisciplinary team-based care models that optometrists are involved in, working at full scope to deliver high quality patient care. Ongoing work to generate research evidence, change policy and secure long-term funding is needed to support implementation.

Background: Implementation of new models of multidisciplinary team-based care or collaborative care can support quality healthcare delivery and the sustainability of future health systems.

Methods: This narrative review synthesises research on models of multidisciplinary team-based care or collaborative care that involve optometrists in Australia and New Zealand. Outcomes related to patient health and experience, health service delivery including costs, and practitioner experience including workforce satisfaction were extracted from published evaluations. Additionally, barriers and facilitating factors to implementation were synthesised from identified studies.

Results: In total, 12 models of care were identified, most were task shifting or task sharing models between optometry and hospital-based ophthalmology for managing eye conditions. These collaborative models were developed to address long waiting lists for hospital-based ophthalmology services, and their implementation resulted in a corresponding decrease in waiting times for appointments. However, patient health outcomes, patient, and practitioner experiences were seldom reported. In primary care settings, models of multidisciplinary team-based care (n =3) were generally well-received by patients and practitioners. However, more objective measures may help quantify the social and economic benefits of these models.

Conclusion: Despite the impetus for multidisciplinary team-based care, barriers to wider implementation persist. Implementation science can help identify strategies to overcome barriers to adopting evidence-based models of care. Future studies should incorporate economic evaluations, to inform advocacy and policy, to generate system-level change that support health organisations to deliver multidisciplinary team-based care. Finally, future work should consider embedding the patient perspective from outset to ensure that models of care are people-centred.

澳大利亚和新西兰验光师参与的多学科团队护理模式:叙述性审查和实施问题的综合。
临床相关性:有可能扩大合作护理和多学科团队护理模式的数量,验光师参与其中,在全范围内提供高质量的患者护理。为支持实施,需要持续开展工作,以产生研究证据、改变政策和获得长期资金。背景:实施以多学科团队为基础的护理或协作护理的新模式可以支持高质量的医疗保健服务和未来卫生系统的可持续性。方法:本文综述了澳大利亚和新西兰验光师参与的多学科团队护理或合作护理模式的综合研究。从已发表的评估中提取与患者健康和经验、卫生服务提供(包括成本)和从业人员经验(包括员工满意度)相关的结果。此外,从确定的研究中综合了实施的障碍和促进因素。结果:共确定了12种护理模式,大多数是验光和医院眼科之间的任务转移或任务共享模式,用于管理眼病。开发这些协作模式是为了解决医院眼科服务的长时间等待名单问题,它们的实施导致预约等待时间相应减少。然而,病人的健康结果、病人和医生的经验很少被报道。在初级保健设置中,多学科团队为基础的护理模式(n =3)普遍受到患者和从业人员的好评。然而,更客观的措施可能有助于量化这些模型的社会和经济效益。结论:尽管推动了多学科团队为基础的护理,障碍继续广泛实施。实施科学可以帮助确定战略,克服采用循证护理模式的障碍。未来的研究应该纳入经济评估,为宣传和政策提供信息,从而产生支持卫生组织提供多学科团队医疗的系统级变革。最后,未来的工作应该考虑从一开始就嵌入病人的观点,以确保护理模式以人为本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书