Exploring career concerns and opportunities for UK-based early career researchers working in the field of eating disorders: Delphi study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Emy Nimbley, Marie-Christine Opitz, Michelle Sader, Emily Newman, Helen Sharpe, Karri Gillespie-Smith, Fiona Duffy
{"title":"Exploring career concerns and opportunities for UK-based early career researchers working in the field of eating disorders: Delphi study.","authors":"Emy Nimbley, Marie-Christine Opitz, Michelle Sader, Emily Newman, Helen Sharpe, Karri Gillespie-Smith, Fiona Duffy","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.11003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there may be common challenges and opportunities for early career researchers (ECRs), those working in the field of eating disorders may face unique barriers and require tailored support.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The current study sought to explore consensus on career concerns and opportunities in eating disorder ECRs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A three-stage Delphi model was conducted. Round 1 involved participants rating career concern and opportunity statements, with free-text responses. Researchers then generated a list of Delphi statements, which were shared in round 2, and participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement. A final round was shared, with median ratings from round 2 and the option to change or further expand on responses. Final consensus was calculated as percentage agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Career concerns reaching consensus included timeline pressures, personal sacrifices for roles, unclear career trajectories, job insecurity, funding concerns, fears of being pushed out of the field and pressures to publish. There was no consensus on a range of other concerns (work/life balance, isolation, mental health and well-being and power imbalances), suggestive of context-dependent experiences. Participants agreed that almost all the presented career opportunities were of importance to eating disorder ECRs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that eating disorder ECRs face significant barriers toward remaining in the field. Although many concerns reflect broader ECR experience (limited research funding, associated job insecurity), some appear to be particularly exacerbated for ECRs working in the eating disorder field. Further research is needed to inform directions for tailored support strategies, such as peer support, mentoring schemes and increased funding from governing bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e105"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13107323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although there may be common challenges and opportunities for early career researchers (ECRs), those working in the field of eating disorders may face unique barriers and require tailored support.

Aims: The current study sought to explore consensus on career concerns and opportunities in eating disorder ECRs.

Method: A three-stage Delphi model was conducted. Round 1 involved participants rating career concern and opportunity statements, with free-text responses. Researchers then generated a list of Delphi statements, which were shared in round 2, and participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement. A final round was shared, with median ratings from round 2 and the option to change or further expand on responses. Final consensus was calculated as percentage agreement.

Results: Career concerns reaching consensus included timeline pressures, personal sacrifices for roles, unclear career trajectories, job insecurity, funding concerns, fears of being pushed out of the field and pressures to publish. There was no consensus on a range of other concerns (work/life balance, isolation, mental health and well-being and power imbalances), suggestive of context-dependent experiences. Participants agreed that almost all the presented career opportunities were of importance to eating disorder ECRs.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that eating disorder ECRs face significant barriers toward remaining in the field. Although many concerns reflect broader ECR experience (limited research funding, associated job insecurity), some appear to be particularly exacerbated for ECRs working in the eating disorder field. Further research is needed to inform directions for tailored support strategies, such as peer support, mentoring schemes and increased funding from governing bodies.

探索英国早期职业研究人员在饮食失调领域的职业关注和机会:德尔菲研究。
背景:尽管早期职业研究人员(ecr)可能面临共同的挑战和机遇,但那些在饮食失调领域工作的人可能面临独特的障碍,需要量身定制的支持。目的:本研究旨在探讨对饮食失调ecr的职业关注和机会的共识。方法:采用三阶段德尔菲模型。第一轮让参与者对职业关注和机会陈述进行评分,并给出自由文本的回答。然后,研究人员生成了一个德尔福语句列表,并在第二轮中共享,参与者被要求表明他们的同意程度。最后一轮是共享的,第二轮的中位数评分和改变或进一步扩大回答的选项。最终共识以同意百分比计算。结果:达成共识的职业担忧包括时间压力、个人角色牺牲、不明确的职业轨迹、工作不安全感、资金担忧、被赶出该领域的恐惧以及发表论文的压力。在一系列其他关切问题(工作/生活平衡、孤立、心理健康和福祉以及权力不平衡)上没有达成共识,这表明存在情境依赖经验。与会者一致认为,几乎所有提出的职业机会对饮食失调的ecr都很重要。结论:研究结果表明,饮食失调的ecr面临着留在该领域的重大障碍。尽管许多担忧反映了更广泛的ECR经验(有限的研究资金,相关的工作不安全),但对于在饮食失调领域工作的ECR来说,有些担忧似乎尤其加剧。需要进行进一步的研究,以便为有针对性的支持战略提供指导,例如同伴支持、指导计划和增加理事机构的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书