[False positives in female testosterone testing and the diagnostic value of mass spectrometry].

Q3 Medicine
北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2026-04-18
Man Wu, Yingying Luo, Linong Ji
{"title":"[False positives in female testosterone testing and the diagnostic value of mass spectrometry].","authors":"Man Wu, Yingying Luo, Linong Ji","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the proportion of pseudo-elevated testosterone levels detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in female patients and to evaluate the application value of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in improving the accuracy of testosterone detection in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on data collected from female patients who presented at Peking University People' s Hospital from January 1, 2020 to May 1, 2024. These patients were initially identified with elevated testosterone levels through CLIA and subsequently underwent additional blood sampling for confirmatory testing using LC-MS/MS. Based on LC-MS/MS results, the patients were categorized into the pseudo-elevated group and the true-elevated group. Dif-ferences in the testosterone levels between the two groups were compared, the false-positive rate of CLIA was calcula-ted, and further evaluations conducted in the pseudo-elevated group were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 287 female patients with elevated testosterone levels detected by CLIA were included in the study. According to the LC-MS/MS results, 178 cases (62.0%) were classified into the pseudo-elevated group, while 109 cases (38.0%) were classified into the true-elevated group. The mean testosterone levels measured by CLIA were (3.63±1.60) nmol/L in the pseudo-elevated group and (4.13±2.20) nmol/L in the true-elevated group, showing a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The false-positive rate of CLIA in detecting testosterone levels in women was 62.0%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for CLIA was 0.601 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.534-0.668) indicating low diagnostic accuracy. Among the pseudo-elevated group, 40.45% of patients underwent multiple CLIA retests, and some patients were subjected to unnecessary clinical evaluations, including imaging and hormonal testing, which significantly increased patient burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the high false-positive rate of CLIA in detecting testosterone levels in female patients, which can result in misdiagnosis, repeated testing, and unnecessary clinical evaluations, thereby increasing patient burden and resulting in inefficient use of medical resources.LC-MS/MS significantly enhances the accuracy of testosterone detection in women and is strongly recommended as the confirmatory test for female patients with elevated testosterone levels initially detected by CLIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"58 2","pages":"332-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the proportion of pseudo-elevated testosterone levels detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in female patients and to evaluate the application value of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in improving the accuracy of testosterone detection in this population.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data collected from female patients who presented at Peking University People' s Hospital from January 1, 2020 to May 1, 2024. These patients were initially identified with elevated testosterone levels through CLIA and subsequently underwent additional blood sampling for confirmatory testing using LC-MS/MS. Based on LC-MS/MS results, the patients were categorized into the pseudo-elevated group and the true-elevated group. Dif-ferences in the testosterone levels between the two groups were compared, the false-positive rate of CLIA was calcula-ted, and further evaluations conducted in the pseudo-elevated group were analyzed.

Results: A total of 287 female patients with elevated testosterone levels detected by CLIA were included in the study. According to the LC-MS/MS results, 178 cases (62.0%) were classified into the pseudo-elevated group, while 109 cases (38.0%) were classified into the true-elevated group. The mean testosterone levels measured by CLIA were (3.63±1.60) nmol/L in the pseudo-elevated group and (4.13±2.20) nmol/L in the true-elevated group, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The false-positive rate of CLIA in detecting testosterone levels in women was 62.0%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for CLIA was 0.601 (95%CI: 0.534-0.668) indicating low diagnostic accuracy. Among the pseudo-elevated group, 40.45% of patients underwent multiple CLIA retests, and some patients were subjected to unnecessary clinical evaluations, including imaging and hormonal testing, which significantly increased patient burden.

Conclusion: This study highlights the high false-positive rate of CLIA in detecting testosterone levels in female patients, which can result in misdiagnosis, repeated testing, and unnecessary clinical evaluations, thereby increasing patient burden and resulting in inefficient use of medical resources.LC-MS/MS significantly enhances the accuracy of testosterone detection in women and is strongly recommended as the confirmatory test for female patients with elevated testosterone levels initially detected by CLIA.

【女性睾酮检测假阳性及质谱诊断价值】。
目的:探讨化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)检测女性患者睾酮假性升高的比例,评价液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)在提高该人群睾酮检测准确性方面的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月1日至2024年5月1日在北京大学人民医院就诊的女性患者资料。这些患者最初通过CLIA发现睾酮水平升高,随后进行了额外的血液采样,使用LC-MS/MS进行确认测试。根据LC-MS/MS结果将患者分为假升高组和真升高组。比较两组睾酮水平差异,计算CLIA假阳性率,分析假升高组进一步评价。结果:CLIA检测到睾酮水平升高的女性患者共287例纳入研究。LC-MS/MS结果显示,假升高组178例(62.0%),真升高组109例(38.0%)。CLIA测定的睾酮平均水平,假升高组为(3.63±1.60)nmol/L,真升高组为(4.13±2.20)nmol/L,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。CLIA检测女性睾酮水平的假阳性率为62.0%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.601 (95%CI: 0.534 ~ 0.668),诊断准确率较低。在假升高组中,40.45%的患者进行了多次CLIA复检,部分患者进行了不必要的临床评估,包括影像学和激素检测,这明显增加了患者的负担。结论:本研究强调CLIA检测女性患者睾酮水平的假阳性率高,容易造成误诊、重复检测和不必要的临床评估,增加患者负担,造成医疗资源的低效利用。LC-MS/MS可显著提高女性睾酮检测的准确性,强烈推荐作为CLIA首次检测睾酮水平升高的女性患者的确证试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases. The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书