Kai Januschowski, Abdullah Salim, Anna Thonet, Spyridon Dimopoulos, Henrike Julich-Haertel, Johann-Peter Engels, Norbert Schulz, Stéphanie Langefeld, Rudolf Siegel, Susanne Hopf
{"title":"Focal ambient visual acuity stimulation improves vision in amblyopic children with stagnating BCVA—A retrospective study","authors":"Kai Januschowski, Abdullah Salim, Anna Thonet, Spyridon Dimopoulos, Henrike Julich-Haertel, Johann-Peter Engels, Norbert Schulz, Stéphanie Langefeld, Rudolf Siegel, Susanne Hopf","doi":"10.1111/aos.70137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate whether amblyopic children with stagnating best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) would benefit from an additional stimulation therapy—specifically focal ambient visual acuity stimulation (FAVAS) integrated into a computer game—compared to occlusion therapy alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective, multicentre study analysed clinical records of 227 children with amblyopia showing stagnation of visual acuity despite at least 90 days of occlusion therapy. Analyses were performed on an eye-based level. Eyes that had received FAVAS (Caterna Vision GmbH, Potsdam, Germany) alongside occlusion therapy were assigned to the FAVAS group, while eyes treated with occlusion therapy alone served as controls. Post hoc propensity score matching was applied. After matching, 105 patients (114 eyes; 57 eyes per group) remained for analysis. The primary endpoint was improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR); the secondary endpoint was change in stereo vision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The FAVAS group showed a significant improvement in BCVA, with a mean gain of 0.15 logMAR (95% CI [0.11;0.18], <i>p</i> < 0.001), compared to a non-significant improvement of 0.01 logMAR (95% CI [−0.02;0.04], <i>p</i> = 0.356) in the control group. No significant changes were observed in stereo vision in either group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The combination of occlusion therapy and FAVAS was superior to occlusion alone in amblyopic children with stagnating BCVA, yielding significant and clinically relevant improvements in visual acuity. These findings support the integration of digital stimulation therapy as an effective adjunct to conventional amblyopia treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00030216.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"104 7","pages":"811-817"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aos.70137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.70137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to investigate whether amblyopic children with stagnating best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) would benefit from an additional stimulation therapy—specifically focal ambient visual acuity stimulation (FAVAS) integrated into a computer game—compared to occlusion therapy alone.
Methods
This retrospective, multicentre study analysed clinical records of 227 children with amblyopia showing stagnation of visual acuity despite at least 90 days of occlusion therapy. Analyses were performed on an eye-based level. Eyes that had received FAVAS (Caterna Vision GmbH, Potsdam, Germany) alongside occlusion therapy were assigned to the FAVAS group, while eyes treated with occlusion therapy alone served as controls. Post hoc propensity score matching was applied. After matching, 105 patients (114 eyes; 57 eyes per group) remained for analysis. The primary endpoint was improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR); the secondary endpoint was change in stereo vision.
Results
The FAVAS group showed a significant improvement in BCVA, with a mean gain of 0.15 logMAR (95% CI [0.11;0.18], p < 0.001), compared to a non-significant improvement of 0.01 logMAR (95% CI [−0.02;0.04], p = 0.356) in the control group. No significant changes were observed in stereo vision in either group.
Conclusion
The combination of occlusion therapy and FAVAS was superior to occlusion alone in amblyopic children with stagnating BCVA, yielding significant and clinically relevant improvements in visual acuity. These findings support the integration of digital stimulation therapy as an effective adjunct to conventional amblyopia treatment.
Trial Registration
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00030216.
期刊介绍:
Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER).
Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.