Focal ambient visual acuity stimulation improves vision in amblyopic children with stagnating BCVA—A retrospective study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2026-10-09 Epub Date: 2026-04-14 DOI:10.1111/aos.70137
Kai Januschowski, Abdullah Salim, Anna Thonet, Spyridon Dimopoulos, Henrike Julich-Haertel, Johann-Peter Engels, Norbert Schulz, Stéphanie Langefeld, Rudolf Siegel, Susanne Hopf
{"title":"Focal ambient visual acuity stimulation improves vision in amblyopic children with stagnating BCVA—A retrospective study","authors":"Kai Januschowski,&nbsp;Abdullah Salim,&nbsp;Anna Thonet,&nbsp;Spyridon Dimopoulos,&nbsp;Henrike Julich-Haertel,&nbsp;Johann-Peter Engels,&nbsp;Norbert Schulz,&nbsp;Stéphanie Langefeld,&nbsp;Rudolf Siegel,&nbsp;Susanne Hopf","doi":"10.1111/aos.70137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate whether amblyopic children with stagnating best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) would benefit from an additional stimulation therapy—specifically focal ambient visual acuity stimulation (FAVAS) integrated into a computer game—compared to occlusion therapy alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective, multicentre study analysed clinical records of 227 children with amblyopia showing stagnation of visual acuity despite at least 90 days of occlusion therapy. Analyses were performed on an eye-based level. Eyes that had received FAVAS (Caterna Vision GmbH, Potsdam, Germany) alongside occlusion therapy were assigned to the FAVAS group, while eyes treated with occlusion therapy alone served as controls. Post hoc propensity score matching was applied. After matching, 105 patients (114 eyes; 57 eyes per group) remained for analysis. The primary endpoint was improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR); the secondary endpoint was change in stereo vision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The FAVAS group showed a significant improvement in BCVA, with a mean gain of 0.15 logMAR (95% CI [0.11;0.18], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), compared to a non-significant improvement of 0.01 logMAR (95% CI [−0.02;0.04], <i>p</i> = 0.356) in the control group. No significant changes were observed in stereo vision in either group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The combination of occlusion therapy and FAVAS was superior to occlusion alone in amblyopic children with stagnating BCVA, yielding significant and clinically relevant improvements in visual acuity. These findings support the integration of digital stimulation therapy as an effective adjunct to conventional amblyopia treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00030216.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"104 7","pages":"811-817"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aos.70137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.70137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate whether amblyopic children with stagnating best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) would benefit from an additional stimulation therapy—specifically focal ambient visual acuity stimulation (FAVAS) integrated into a computer game—compared to occlusion therapy alone.

Methods

This retrospective, multicentre study analysed clinical records of 227 children with amblyopia showing stagnation of visual acuity despite at least 90 days of occlusion therapy. Analyses were performed on an eye-based level. Eyes that had received FAVAS (Caterna Vision GmbH, Potsdam, Germany) alongside occlusion therapy were assigned to the FAVAS group, while eyes treated with occlusion therapy alone served as controls. Post hoc propensity score matching was applied. After matching, 105 patients (114 eyes; 57 eyes per group) remained for analysis. The primary endpoint was improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR); the secondary endpoint was change in stereo vision.

Results

The FAVAS group showed a significant improvement in BCVA, with a mean gain of 0.15 logMAR (95% CI [0.11;0.18], p < 0.001), compared to a non-significant improvement of 0.01 logMAR (95% CI [−0.02;0.04], p = 0.356) in the control group. No significant changes were observed in stereo vision in either group.

Conclusion

The combination of occlusion therapy and FAVAS was superior to occlusion alone in amblyopic children with stagnating BCVA, yielding significant and clinically relevant improvements in visual acuity. These findings support the integration of digital stimulation therapy as an effective adjunct to conventional amblyopia treatment.

Trial Registration

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00030216.

局灶性环境视力刺激改善弱视bcva停滞儿童视力的回顾性研究。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨与单独的遮挡治疗相比,最佳矫正视力(BCVA)停滞的弱视儿童是否会从额外的刺激治疗中受益-特别是与电脑游戏相结合的焦点环境视力刺激(FAVAS)。方法:这项回顾性的多中心研究分析了227例弱视儿童的临床记录,这些儿童在至少90天的闭塞治疗后仍表现出视力停滞。分析是在基于眼睛的水平上进行的。接受了FAVAS (Caterna Vision GmbH, Potsdam, Germany)和闭塞治疗的眼睛被分配到FAVAS组,而单独接受闭塞治疗的眼睛作为对照。采用事后倾向评分匹配。匹配后,105例患者(114只眼,每组57只眼)留作分析。主要终点是最佳矫正视力(BCVA, logMAR)的改善;次要终点是立体视觉的改变。结果:FAVAS组对BCVA有显著改善,平均增加0.15 logMAR (95% CI [0.11;0.18], p)。结论:在弱视伴BCVA停滞的患儿中,闭塞治疗联合FAVAS优于单纯闭塞治疗,可显著改善视力,具有临床意义。这些发现支持将数字刺激疗法作为传统弱视治疗的有效辅助手段。试验注册:德国临床试验注册(DRKS): DRKS00030216。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书