Association between weight-adjusted waist and incidence of low back pain: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Pub Date : 2026-04-14 Epub Date: 2026-06-09 DOI:10.1007/s40520-026-03351-1
Xueru Shen, Dexin Hu, Yixing Lu, Lixin Zhao, Hua Yuan, Xiaolong Sun
{"title":"Association between weight-adjusted waist and incidence of low back pain: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study","authors":"Xueru Shen,&nbsp;Dexin Hu,&nbsp;Yixing Lu,&nbsp;Lixin Zhao,&nbsp;Hua Yuan,&nbsp;Xiaolong Sun","doi":"10.1007/s40520-026-03351-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p>The weight-adjusted waist index (WWI), a novel adiposity metric, provides precise assessment of abdominal fat accumulation. This longitudinal study aims to examine the association between WWI and incident low back pain (LBP) risk in middle-aged and older Chinese adults.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) (2011–2020) were utilized. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess WWI’s association with incident LBP, while restricted cubic splines (RCS) modeled their potential nonlinear relationship. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate LBP-free probabilities across WWI strata. Sensitivity analyses included multiple imputation and subgroup analyses.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 3,912 individuals were included in the study. After full adjustment for covariates, each 1-unit increase in WWI within the highest WWI quintile was associated with an 18.6% elevated risk of incident LBP (HR = 1.186, 95% CI: 1.057–1.331). Further analysis revealed a J-shaped association between WWI and incident LBP risk, whereby each 1-unit increment above 10.56 corresponded to a significant 9.6% risk increase (HR = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.026–1.171). A lower probability of remaining LBP-free was observed in the highest WWI quintile group (Q5) relative to other groups (<i>p</i> = 0.00018). Additionally, no statistically significant interaction effects were observed across subgroups (all interaction <i>P</i> &gt; 0.05).</p><h3>Discussions &amp; Conclusions</h3><p>In the Q5, WWI demonstrated an independent association with incident LBP. A critical risk threshold of WWI = 10.56 was established, suggesting the potential of WWI as a screening tool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-026-03351-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-026-03351-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

The weight-adjusted waist index (WWI), a novel adiposity metric, provides precise assessment of abdominal fat accumulation. This longitudinal study aims to examine the association between WWI and incident low back pain (LBP) risk in middle-aged and older Chinese adults.

Methods

Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) (2011–2020) were utilized. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess WWI’s association with incident LBP, while restricted cubic splines (RCS) modeled their potential nonlinear relationship. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate LBP-free probabilities across WWI strata. Sensitivity analyses included multiple imputation and subgroup analyses.

Results

A total of 3,912 individuals were included in the study. After full adjustment for covariates, each 1-unit increase in WWI within the highest WWI quintile was associated with an 18.6% elevated risk of incident LBP (HR = 1.186, 95% CI: 1.057–1.331). Further analysis revealed a J-shaped association between WWI and incident LBP risk, whereby each 1-unit increment above 10.56 corresponded to a significant 9.6% risk increase (HR = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.026–1.171). A lower probability of remaining LBP-free was observed in the highest WWI quintile group (Q5) relative to other groups (p = 0.00018). Additionally, no statistically significant interaction effects were observed across subgroups (all interaction P > 0.05).

Discussions & Conclusions

In the Q5, WWI demonstrated an independent association with incident LBP. A critical risk threshold of WWI = 10.56 was established, suggesting the potential of WWI as a screening tool.

Abstract Image

体重调整腰部与腰痛发生率的关系:来自中国健康与退休纵向研究的证据
背景和目的体重调整腰围指数(WWI)是一种新的肥胖指标,可以精确评估腹部脂肪积累。本纵向研究旨在探讨第一次世界大战与中国中老年人腰痛(LBP)风险的关系。方法采用中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS) 2011-2020年的数据。Cox比例风险模型用于评估第一次世界大战与事件LBP的关系,而限制三次样条(RCS)模型则模拟了它们之间潜在的非线性关系。生成Kaplan-Meier曲线来估计第一次世界大战地层中无lbp的概率。敏感性分析包括多重输入和亚组分析。结果本研究共纳入3912人。在对协变量进行全面调整后,在WWI最高的五分位数内,WWI每增加1个单位,LBP发生风险增加18.6% (HR = 1.186, 95% CI: 1.057-1.331)。进一步分析显示,第一次世界大战与事件LBP风险之间呈j型相关性,10.56以上每增加1个单位,风险增加9.6% (HR = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.026-1.171)。与其他组相比,WWI最高五分位数组(Q5)剩余无lbp的概率较低(p = 0.00018)。此外,亚组间未观察到有统计学意义的相互作用效应(所有相互作用P >; 0.05)。讨论&结论在Q5中,WWI显示了与LBP事件的独立关联。建立了WWI = 10.56的临界风险阈值,提示WWI作为筛查工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书