Association between femoral cortical thickness index and hip fracture in older persons

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Alperen Kaan Yaman, Doğaç Karagüven, Burak Akan, Berk Güçlü, Hakan Ömeroğlu
{"title":"Association between femoral cortical thickness index and hip fracture in older persons","authors":"Alperen Kaan Yaman,&nbsp;Doğaç Karagüven,&nbsp;Burak Akan,&nbsp;Berk Güçlü,&nbsp;Hakan Ömeroğlu","doi":"10.1007/s11657-026-01699-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to reevaluate a simple radiographic measurement, the cortical thickness index (CTI), using standard plain radiographs to investigate its association with the presence of hip fracture in older persons. </p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study group (SG) consisted of 46 patients (35 females, 11 males) aged 65 years and older who presented to the emergency department with hip fractures. Two control groups were formed: One comprising 46 older persons aged 65 years and older (CG-G) and another of young adults aged 20–30 (CG-YA), both referred to the outpatient clinic and had available plain hip radiographs. CTI was measured for all participants by the first author. Additionally, two observers independently measured CTI to assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was almost perfect based on Cohen’s kappa classification (<span>\\(\\kappa\\)</span> &gt; 0.8). The mean CTI for the SG was 0.389 ± 0.05, while the mean CTI for the CG-G was 0.571 ± 0.048, and for the CG-YA was 0.585 ± 0.048. A statistically significant difference was found between the SG and both CG-G and CG-YA groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No significant difference was observed between CG-G and CG-YA (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). A CTI threshold of 0.485 demonstrated high discriminative ability for distinguishing older persons with hip fracture from those without fracture, yielding a sensitivity of 97.83% and a specificity of 95.65%.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CTI is significantly reduced in older persons with hip fracture. As a quick and accessible measurement on standard radiographs, CTI may assist clinicians in distinguishing individuals with hip fracture from those without fracture in outpatient settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-026-01699-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to reevaluate a simple radiographic measurement, the cortical thickness index (CTI), using standard plain radiographs to investigate its association with the presence of hip fracture in older persons.

Methods

The study group (SG) consisted of 46 patients (35 females, 11 males) aged 65 years and older who presented to the emergency department with hip fractures. Two control groups were formed: One comprising 46 older persons aged 65 years and older (CG-G) and another of young adults aged 20–30 (CG-YA), both referred to the outpatient clinic and had available plain hip radiographs. CTI was measured for all participants by the first author. Additionally, two observers independently measured CTI to assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

Results

Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was almost perfect based on Cohen’s kappa classification (\(\kappa\) > 0.8). The mean CTI for the SG was 0.389 ± 0.05, while the mean CTI for the CG-G was 0.571 ± 0.048, and for the CG-YA was 0.585 ± 0.048. A statistically significant difference was found between the SG and both CG-G and CG-YA groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between CG-G and CG-YA (p > 0.05). A CTI threshold of 0.485 demonstrated high discriminative ability for distinguishing older persons with hip fracture from those without fracture, yielding a sensitivity of 97.83% and a specificity of 95.65%.

Conclusion

CTI is significantly reduced in older persons with hip fracture. As a quick and accessible measurement on standard radiographs, CTI may assist clinicians in distinguishing individuals with hip fracture from those without fracture in outpatient settings.

老年人股骨皮质厚度指数与髋部骨折的关系。
目的:本研究旨在重新评估一个简单的x线测量,皮质厚度指数(CTI),使用标准x线平片调查其与老年人髋部骨折存在的关系。方法:研究组(SG)包括46例65岁及以上因髋部骨折就诊的急诊患者(女性35例,男性11例)。组成两个对照组:一组包括46名65岁及以上的老年人(CG-G),另一组包括20-30岁的年轻人(CG-YA),他们都就诊于门诊诊所,并有髋关节平片。第一作者测量了所有参与者的CTI。此外,两名观察员独立测量CTI,以评估观察员内部和观察员之间的协议。结果:基于Cohen的kappa分类(κ > 0.8),观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性几乎是完美的。SG的平均CTI为0.389±0.05,CG-G的平均CTI为0.571±0.048,CG-YA的平均CTI为0.585±0.048。SG组与CG-G组、CG-YA组比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CTI阈值为0.485,对老年人髋部骨折和非髋部骨折具有较高的区分能力,敏感性为97.83%,特异性为95.65%。结论:老年髋部骨折患者的CTI明显减少。作为标准x线片上的一种快速、方便的测量方法,CTI可以帮助临床医生在门诊环境中区分髋部骨折患者和非骨折患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书