Influence of Different Washing Hair Procedures in the Quantitative Determination of THC and THCCOOH.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Valentina Martini, Alessandro Raffagli, Cristiana Stramesi, Claudia Vignali, Stefania Ortu, Paolo Franceschini, Ilaria Baudone, Paolo Bucchioni, Luca Morini
{"title":"Influence of Different Washing Hair Procedures in the Quantitative Determination of THC and THCCOOH.","authors":"Valentina Martini, Alessandro Raffagli, Cristiana Stramesi, Claudia Vignali, Stefania Ortu, Paolo Franceschini, Ilaria Baudone, Paolo Bucchioni, Luca Morini","doi":"10.1002/dta.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental exposure can affect hair analysis, making decontamination a critical preanalytical step. No standardized washing protocol exists, and laboratories use different solvent combinations. This study evaluated the impact of three common hair decontamination procedures on THC and its primary metabolite, THCCOOH, in cannabinoid-positive hair samples. Hair samples were longitudinally divided into three aliquots and subjected to three different washing protocols. After alkaline hydrolysis, THC and THCCOOH were extracted by liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS (NCI), respectively. In selected cases, washing solvents were also analyzed to assess analyte loss during decontamination. THC concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 3.9 ng/mg and were significantly influenced by the washing procedure. Compared with Protocol A, mean THC losses of 18.5% and 54.2% were observed after Protocols B and C, respectively, with reductions exceeding 80.0% in several samples following Protocol C. In some cases, this decrease was sufficient to shift samples from positive to negative relative to the 0.05 ng/mg cut-off. Analysis of washing solvents confirmed substantial extraction of THC during Protocol C, particularly in the dichloromethane fraction following the aqueous wash. In contrast, THCCOOH concentrations showed minimal variability across all washing procedures, with mean losses below 10.0%. The choice of washing protocol markedly affects THC quantification in hair, potentially leading to underestimation and misclassification, whereas THCCOOH remains largely unaffected. These findings highlight the need for standardized decontamination procedures to ensure reliable and comparable results in forensic and clinical hair analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental exposure can affect hair analysis, making decontamination a critical preanalytical step. No standardized washing protocol exists, and laboratories use different solvent combinations. This study evaluated the impact of three common hair decontamination procedures on THC and its primary metabolite, THCCOOH, in cannabinoid-positive hair samples. Hair samples were longitudinally divided into three aliquots and subjected to three different washing protocols. After alkaline hydrolysis, THC and THCCOOH were extracted by liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS (NCI), respectively. In selected cases, washing solvents were also analyzed to assess analyte loss during decontamination. THC concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 3.9 ng/mg and were significantly influenced by the washing procedure. Compared with Protocol A, mean THC losses of 18.5% and 54.2% were observed after Protocols B and C, respectively, with reductions exceeding 80.0% in several samples following Protocol C. In some cases, this decrease was sufficient to shift samples from positive to negative relative to the 0.05 ng/mg cut-off. Analysis of washing solvents confirmed substantial extraction of THC during Protocol C, particularly in the dichloromethane fraction following the aqueous wash. In contrast, THCCOOH concentrations showed minimal variability across all washing procedures, with mean losses below 10.0%. The choice of washing protocol markedly affects THC quantification in hair, potentially leading to underestimation and misclassification, whereas THCCOOH remains largely unaffected. These findings highlight the need for standardized decontamination procedures to ensure reliable and comparable results in forensic and clinical hair analysis.

不同洗发方式对四氢大麻酚和四氢大麻酚定量测定的影响。
环境暴露会影响头发分析,使去污成为关键的分析前步骤。没有标准化的洗涤方案存在,实验室使用不同的溶剂组合。本研究评估了三种常见的头发去污程序对大麻素阳性头发样本中四氢大麻酚及其主要代谢物四氢大麻酚的影响。头发样本被纵向分成三等份,并接受三种不同的洗涤方案。碱解后,采用液液萃取法提取四氢大麻酚和四氢大麻酚,分别采用GC-MS和GC-MS/MS (NCI)进行分析。在选定的情况下,还分析了洗涤溶剂,以评估分析物在去污过程中的损失。四氢大麻酚浓度范围为0.03至3.9 ng/mg,并受到洗涤程序的显著影响。与方案A相比,在方案B和C之后,THC的平均损失分别为18.5%和54.2%,在方案C之后的几个样品中减少了超过80.0%。在某些情况下,相对于0.05 ng/mg的截止值,这种减少足以使样品从阳性变为阴性。对洗涤溶剂的分析证实,在方案C中提取了大量的四氢大麻酚,特别是在水溶液洗涤后的二氯甲烷部分。相比之下,THCCOOH浓度在所有洗涤过程中表现出最小的变化,平均损失低于10.0%。洗涤方案的选择显著影响头发中四氢大麻酚的定量,可能导致低估和错误分类,而四氢大麻酚在很大程度上不受影响。这些发现强调了标准化去污程序的必要性,以确保法医和临床头发分析的可靠和可比结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书