Valentina Martini, Alessandro Raffagli, Cristiana Stramesi, Claudia Vignali, Stefania Ortu, Paolo Franceschini, Ilaria Baudone, Paolo Bucchioni, Luca Morini
{"title":"Influence of Different Washing Hair Procedures in the Quantitative Determination of THC and THCCOOH.","authors":"Valentina Martini, Alessandro Raffagli, Cristiana Stramesi, Claudia Vignali, Stefania Ortu, Paolo Franceschini, Ilaria Baudone, Paolo Bucchioni, Luca Morini","doi":"10.1002/dta.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental exposure can affect hair analysis, making decontamination a critical preanalytical step. No standardized washing protocol exists, and laboratories use different solvent combinations. This study evaluated the impact of three common hair decontamination procedures on THC and its primary metabolite, THCCOOH, in cannabinoid-positive hair samples. Hair samples were longitudinally divided into three aliquots and subjected to three different washing protocols. After alkaline hydrolysis, THC and THCCOOH were extracted by liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS (NCI), respectively. In selected cases, washing solvents were also analyzed to assess analyte loss during decontamination. THC concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 3.9 ng/mg and were significantly influenced by the washing procedure. Compared with Protocol A, mean THC losses of 18.5% and 54.2% were observed after Protocols B and C, respectively, with reductions exceeding 80.0% in several samples following Protocol C. In some cases, this decrease was sufficient to shift samples from positive to negative relative to the 0.05 ng/mg cut-off. Analysis of washing solvents confirmed substantial extraction of THC during Protocol C, particularly in the dichloromethane fraction following the aqueous wash. In contrast, THCCOOH concentrations showed minimal variability across all washing procedures, with mean losses below 10.0%. The choice of washing protocol markedly affects THC quantification in hair, potentially leading to underestimation and misclassification, whereas THCCOOH remains largely unaffected. These findings highlight the need for standardized decontamination procedures to ensure reliable and comparable results in forensic and clinical hair analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental exposure can affect hair analysis, making decontamination a critical preanalytical step. No standardized washing protocol exists, and laboratories use different solvent combinations. This study evaluated the impact of three common hair decontamination procedures on THC and its primary metabolite, THCCOOH, in cannabinoid-positive hair samples. Hair samples were longitudinally divided into three aliquots and subjected to three different washing protocols. After alkaline hydrolysis, THC and THCCOOH were extracted by liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS (NCI), respectively. In selected cases, washing solvents were also analyzed to assess analyte loss during decontamination. THC concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 3.9 ng/mg and were significantly influenced by the washing procedure. Compared with Protocol A, mean THC losses of 18.5% and 54.2% were observed after Protocols B and C, respectively, with reductions exceeding 80.0% in several samples following Protocol C. In some cases, this decrease was sufficient to shift samples from positive to negative relative to the 0.05 ng/mg cut-off. Analysis of washing solvents confirmed substantial extraction of THC during Protocol C, particularly in the dichloromethane fraction following the aqueous wash. In contrast, THCCOOH concentrations showed minimal variability across all washing procedures, with mean losses below 10.0%. The choice of washing protocol markedly affects THC quantification in hair, potentially leading to underestimation and misclassification, whereas THCCOOH remains largely unaffected. These findings highlight the need for standardized decontamination procedures to ensure reliable and comparable results in forensic and clinical hair analysis.
期刊介绍:
As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances.
In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds).
Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.