Individualized strategy of treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm using causal inference model: a retrospective observational study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Youngki Sohn, Youngje Woo, Sangkyun Mok, Eunju Jang, Ki-Yoon Moon, Sun Cheol Park, Sang Seob Yun, Jang Yong Kim
{"title":"Individualized strategy of treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm using causal inference model: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Youngki Sohn, Youngje Woo, Sangkyun Mok, Eunju Jang, Ki-Yoon Moon, Sun Cheol Park, Sang Seob Yun, Jang Yong Kim","doi":"10.4174/astr.2026.110.4.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was performed to predict individualized treatment strategies in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) by estimating the survival benefit of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) based on anatomical and physiological features using a causal inference model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 45 patients with de novo rAAA who underwent EVAR or OSR between 2012 and 2024. Thirty-three variables were analyzed. The model estimated individualized treatment effects (ITE) for 30-day survival. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis. Five-fold cross-validation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and calibration plots were used for model evaluation. A clinical decision tree was developed to derive simplified decision rules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ITE was 0.22 ± 0.42, with 33% of patients classified as OSR-benefit candidates. SHAP analysis revealed that suprarenal angle, infrarenal angle, iliac anatomy, and proximal neck characteristics strongly influenced treatment effects. However, some predictors, such as low hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure favoring OSR, conflicted with clinical intuition. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 1.00, but calibration suggested overfitting due to a small sample size. Treatment-matched patients had a higher 30-day mortality rate than mismatched patients, suggesting potential bias or unmeasured confounding. The decision tree identified clinically relevant features but displayed structural inconsistencies and impractical cutoff values due to the limited sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The X-learner model demonstrated the feasibility of individualized treatment prediction in rAAA but suffered from overfitting and limited generalizability. Validation with larger multicenter cohorts is necessary to confirm clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":"110 4","pages":"259-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2026.110.4.259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to predict individualized treatment strategies in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) by estimating the survival benefit of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) based on anatomical and physiological features using a causal inference model.

Methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients with de novo rAAA who underwent EVAR or OSR between 2012 and 2024. Thirty-three variables were analyzed. The model estimated individualized treatment effects (ITE) for 30-day survival. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis. Five-fold cross-validation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and calibration plots were used for model evaluation. A clinical decision tree was developed to derive simplified decision rules.

Results: The mean ITE was 0.22 ± 0.42, with 33% of patients classified as OSR-benefit candidates. SHAP analysis revealed that suprarenal angle, infrarenal angle, iliac anatomy, and proximal neck characteristics strongly influenced treatment effects. However, some predictors, such as low hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure favoring OSR, conflicted with clinical intuition. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 1.00, but calibration suggested overfitting due to a small sample size. Treatment-matched patients had a higher 30-day mortality rate than mismatched patients, suggesting potential bias or unmeasured confounding. The decision tree identified clinically relevant features but displayed structural inconsistencies and impractical cutoff values due to the limited sample size.

Conclusion: The X-learner model demonstrated the feasibility of individualized treatment prediction in rAAA but suffered from overfitting and limited generalizability. Validation with larger multicenter cohorts is necessary to confirm clinical applicability.

应用因果推理模型的个体化治疗腹主动脉瘤破裂策略:一项回顾性观察研究。
目的:本研究基于解剖和生理特征,采用因果推理模型估计血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)和开放手术修复(OSR)的生存效益,预测破裂腹主动脉瘤(rAAA)的个体化治疗策略。方法:本回顾性研究纳入45例2012 - 2024年间行EVAR或OSR的新发rAAA患者。分析了33个变量。该模型估计了30天生存期的个体化治疗效果(ITE)。采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)分析评估模型可解释性。采用五重交叉验证、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和校正图进行模型评价。开发了一种临床决策树来推导简化的决策规则。结果:平均ITE为0.22±0.42,33%的患者被归类为osr获益候选患者。SHAP分析显示,肾上角、肾下角、髂解剖和近端颈部特征对治疗效果有很大影响。然而,一些预测因素,如低血红蛋白和收缩压倾向于OSR,与临床直觉相冲突。ROC分析显示曲线下面积为1.00,但校正显示样本量小导致过拟合。治疗匹配的患者的30天死亡率高于不匹配的患者,提示潜在的偏倚或未测量的混淆。决策树确定了临床相关特征,但由于样本量有限,显示出结构不一致和不切实际的截止值。结论:x -学习者模型对rAAA患者的个体化治疗预测具有可行性,但存在过拟合和推广能力不足的问题。需要更大的多中心队列验证来确认临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书