Uncertainties of enhanced rock weathering for climate-change mitigation

Marcus Schiedung, Kirsty J. Harrington, Xavier Dupla, Benjamin Möller, Ennio Facq, Tim Sweere, Axel Don, Robert G. Hilton, Sebastian Doetterl, Jordon D. Hemingway
{"title":"Uncertainties of enhanced rock weathering for climate-change mitigation","authors":"Marcus Schiedung, Kirsty J. Harrington, Xavier Dupla, Benjamin Möller, Ennio Facq, Tim Sweere, Axel Don, Robert G. Hilton, Sebastian Doetterl, Jordon D. Hemingway","doi":"10.1038/s43017-026-00761-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) on agricultural soils is under consideration as a long-term carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy. In this Perspective, we evaluate uncertainties related to ERW around feedstock availability, plant–soil system impacts, CDR efficiency along the land–ocean continuum and socio-economic considerations. The composition of (ultra)mafic rocks places constraints on the availability of suitable feedstock when considering their potential for CDR and toxic element contents. For ERW application at scale, dedicated mining for suitable feedstock seems unavoidable. ERW can positively and negatively affect soil structure, hydrology, and overall carbon and nutrient cycles, and so optimal ERW will require site-specific assessment of effective CDR and mitigation of potential negative impacts. Additionally, the fate of weathering products along the land–ocean continuum in rivers remains poorly constrained, which is a challenge for verifying successful CDR. The socio-economic effects and constraints of ERW regarding financing and risk responsibility are also uncertain. Ultimately, large-scale ERW deployment seems limited by substantial challenges throughout its application, from its initial set-up to final CDR. Future research prioritizing site-specific assessments, long-term monitoring along the land–ocean continuum, and system modelling to constrain uncertainties and address socio-economic factors is needed to ensure that ERW deployment is effective, equitable, and sustainable. Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) is a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy that converts atmospheric CO2 to stable carbonates by applying minerals to agricultural land. This Perspective discusses the potential difficulties in scaling ERW, covering feedstock availability, impacts on soil–plant systems, uncertainties around CDR efficiency along the land–ocean continuum and socio-economic challenges.","PeriodicalId":18921,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","volume":"7 4","pages":"253-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-026-00761-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) on agricultural soils is under consideration as a long-term carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy. In this Perspective, we evaluate uncertainties related to ERW around feedstock availability, plant–soil system impacts, CDR efficiency along the land–ocean continuum and socio-economic considerations. The composition of (ultra)mafic rocks places constraints on the availability of suitable feedstock when considering their potential for CDR and toxic element contents. For ERW application at scale, dedicated mining for suitable feedstock seems unavoidable. ERW can positively and negatively affect soil structure, hydrology, and overall carbon and nutrient cycles, and so optimal ERW will require site-specific assessment of effective CDR and mitigation of potential negative impacts. Additionally, the fate of weathering products along the land–ocean continuum in rivers remains poorly constrained, which is a challenge for verifying successful CDR. The socio-economic effects and constraints of ERW regarding financing and risk responsibility are also uncertain. Ultimately, large-scale ERW deployment seems limited by substantial challenges throughout its application, from its initial set-up to final CDR. Future research prioritizing site-specific assessments, long-term monitoring along the land–ocean continuum, and system modelling to constrain uncertainties and address socio-economic factors is needed to ensure that ERW deployment is effective, equitable, and sustainable. Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) is a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy that converts atmospheric CO2 to stable carbonates by applying minerals to agricultural land. This Perspective discusses the potential difficulties in scaling ERW, covering feedstock availability, impacts on soil–plant systems, uncertainties around CDR efficiency along the land–ocean continuum and socio-economic challenges.

Abstract Image

缓解气候变化的增强岩石风化的不确定性
增强农业土壤的岩石风化(ERW)被认为是一种长期的二氧化碳去除(CDR)策略。在这个视角中,我们评估了与原料可用性、植物-土壤系统影响、陆地-海洋连续体上CDR效率和社会经济因素有关的战争遗留问题的不确定性。当考虑到(超)基性岩石的潜在CDR和有毒元素含量时,它们的组成限制了合适原料的可用性。对于大规模的战争遗留爆炸物应用,专门开采合适的原料似乎是不可避免的。剩余生态环境可以对土壤结构、水文以及整体碳和养分循环产生积极和消极的影响,因此,最佳剩余生态环境需要对具体地点的有效CDR进行评估,并减轻潜在的负面影响。此外,河流中沿陆-海连续体的风化产物的命运仍然知之甚少,这对验证成功的CDR是一个挑战。战争遗留爆炸物在筹资和风险责任方面的社会经济影响和制约因素也不确定。从最初的设置到最终的CDR,大规模的战争遗留爆炸物部署似乎受到了整个应用过程中实质性挑战的限制。未来的研究需要优先考虑特定地点的评估、陆地-海洋连续体的长期监测和系统建模,以限制不确定性和解决社会经济因素,以确保战争遗留武器的有效、公平和可持续部署。增强岩石风化(ERW)是一种二氧化碳去除(CDR)策略,通过在农业用地上施用矿物质,将大气中的二氧化碳转化为稳定的碳酸盐。本展望讨论了扩大ERW规模的潜在困难,包括原料可用性、对土壤-植物系统的影响、陆地-海洋连续体中CDR效率的不确定性以及社会经济挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书