Eyes Wide Shut: Gender Blindness and the Market of Privilege in Polish Academia

IF 3 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Gender Work and Organization Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI:10.1111/gwao.70097
Anna M. Gorska, Elena P. Antonacopoulou, Nina Kotula
{"title":"Eyes Wide Shut: Gender Blindness and the Market of Privilege in Polish Academia","authors":"Anna M. Gorska,&nbsp;Elena P. Antonacopoulou,&nbsp;Nina Kotula","doi":"10.1111/gwao.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article makes a compelling contribution in advancing our understanding of the unintended consequences of gender equality initiatives within Polish higher education institutions (HEIs) by demonstrating the willful ignorance of the persistent inequalities, which we term the phenomenon of “eyes wide shut.” Consistent with the previous reference to neoliberal policies perpetuating a “market of privilege” that fosters gender blindness and enhances systemic inequalities, our analysis extends these by drawing attention to the lack of ownership and accountability in addressing these inequalities. It is about the emerging phenomenon of willfully ignoring persistent gender inequalities by choosing not to take a stance, despite being afforded that choice as a social actor. Drawing on in-depth qualitative research involving 30 academics from Polish business schools, we reveal a widespread belief in meritocracy, especially among male participants, who claim that academic work is solely competence-based and thus disregard gender inequalities. This gender-blind stance not only neglects the structural challenges faced by women but also perpetuates male-dominated and hegemonic academic norms. We identify a paradox where gender equality initiatives, often viewed as unnecessary or forced, provoke resistance from some male academics, who perceive them as discriminatory. Men in the study expressed feelings of reverse discrimination, citing concerns over women's increasing presence in leadership roles and all-female research teams. At the same time, female academics frequently recount experiences of marginalization and inequality. These narratives showcase how gender blindness reinforces a market of privilege by willfully ignoring them. We make the case that alongside concepts such as gender blindness as a mechanism that upholds a market of privilege in academia, where perceived neutrality conceals persistent gender biases, there is also the reluctance to own up and to exercise the choice afforded to social actors to address gender inequalities. We conceptualize this willful refusal to act as part of the phenomenon we term “eyes wide shut.” We explain this phenomenon as another unintended consequence of neoliberal systems modeled after Western standards that fail to create genuine equality. We adopt a place-based orientation that helps us explain this willful ignorance as a consequence of the broader sociocultural and historical context in which Polish HEIs operate.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"33 3","pages":"931-946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.70097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article makes a compelling contribution in advancing our understanding of the unintended consequences of gender equality initiatives within Polish higher education institutions (HEIs) by demonstrating the willful ignorance of the persistent inequalities, which we term the phenomenon of “eyes wide shut.” Consistent with the previous reference to neoliberal policies perpetuating a “market of privilege” that fosters gender blindness and enhances systemic inequalities, our analysis extends these by drawing attention to the lack of ownership and accountability in addressing these inequalities. It is about the emerging phenomenon of willfully ignoring persistent gender inequalities by choosing not to take a stance, despite being afforded that choice as a social actor. Drawing on in-depth qualitative research involving 30 academics from Polish business schools, we reveal a widespread belief in meritocracy, especially among male participants, who claim that academic work is solely competence-based and thus disregard gender inequalities. This gender-blind stance not only neglects the structural challenges faced by women but also perpetuates male-dominated and hegemonic academic norms. We identify a paradox where gender equality initiatives, often viewed as unnecessary or forced, provoke resistance from some male academics, who perceive them as discriminatory. Men in the study expressed feelings of reverse discrimination, citing concerns over women's increasing presence in leadership roles and all-female research teams. At the same time, female academics frequently recount experiences of marginalization and inequality. These narratives showcase how gender blindness reinforces a market of privilege by willfully ignoring them. We make the case that alongside concepts such as gender blindness as a mechanism that upholds a market of privilege in academia, where perceived neutrality conceals persistent gender biases, there is also the reluctance to own up and to exercise the choice afforded to social actors to address gender inequalities. We conceptualize this willful refusal to act as part of the phenomenon we term “eyes wide shut.” We explain this phenomenon as another unintended consequence of neoliberal systems modeled after Western standards that fail to create genuine equality. We adopt a place-based orientation that helps us explain this willful ignorance as a consequence of the broader sociocultural and historical context in which Polish HEIs operate.

睁大眼睛:波兰学术界的性别盲目性与特权市场
本文通过展示波兰高等教育机构(HEIs)对持续存在的不平等现象(我们称之为“睁大眼睛闭上眼睛”的现象)的故意无知,在增进我们对性别平等倡议的意外后果的理解方面做出了令人信服的贡献。与之前提到的新自由主义政策使“特权市场”永久化,助长性别盲目性并加剧系统性不平等一致,我们的分析通过关注在解决这些不平等时缺乏所有权和问责制来扩展这些问题。它是关于一种新出现的现象,即故意忽视持续存在的性别不平等,选择不表明立场,尽管作为一个社会行动者有这样的选择。我们对来自波兰商学院的30名学者进行了深入的定性研究,发现人们普遍相信精英管理,尤其是在男性参与者中,他们声称学术工作完全是基于能力的,因此忽视了性别不平等。这种性别盲的立场不仅忽视了女性面临的结构性挑战,而且使男性主导和霸权的学术规范永久化。我们发现了一个悖论,即性别平等倡议往往被视为不必要或被迫的,却引发了一些男性学者的抵制,他们认为这是歧视性的。研究中的男性表达了反向歧视的感觉,理由是对女性在领导角色和全女性研究团队中越来越多的存在感到担忧。与此同时,女性学者经常讲述边缘化和不平等的经历。这些叙述表明,性别盲目性是如何通过故意忽视它们来强化特权市场的。我们认为,除了性别盲目性等概念作为维护学术界特权市场的机制之外,人们还不愿意承认并行使赋予社会行为者的选择权,以解决性别不平等问题。我们将这种故意拒绝行动的现象概念化,称之为“睁大眼睛闭上眼睛”现象的一部分。我们将这种现象解释为模仿西方标准的新自由主义制度的另一个意想不到的后果,这些制度未能创造真正的平等。我们采用了一种基于地点的取向,这有助于我们解释波兰高等教育机构所处的更广泛的社会文化和历史背景所导致的这种故意无知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书