Fertility Governance Through Cascaded Accountability: Building Inclusive Safety Nets for Vulnerable Workers

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Gender Work and Organization Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI:10.1111/gwao.70089
Meltem Yavuz Serçekman, Mustafa F. Özbilgin
{"title":"Fertility Governance Through Cascaded Accountability: Building Inclusive Safety Nets for Vulnerable Workers","authors":"Meltem Yavuz Serçekman,&nbsp;Mustafa F. Özbilgin","doi":"10.1111/gwao.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how workplace fertility governance operates as a system of control, consent, and inequality shaped by organizational, cultural, and institutional forces. Drawing on feminist theory, we develop a multilevel framework of cascading accountability that integrates symbolic violence, biopolitics, chrononormativity, and postfeminist agency to analyze how corporate fertility benefits simultaneously expand and constrain reproductive autonomy. Using feminist thematic analysis of media coverage, corporate materials, digital lived experiences, and independent reports, we show how fertility support schemes reinforce normative timelines, managerial control, and affective expectations, particularly for structurally marginalized groups such as migrants, LGBTQ+ workers, and racialized minorities. Throughout this paper, fertility governance is treated not as a women's issue per se but as a system regulating reproductive capacity across differently gendered bodies, including cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary workers. Theoretically, we synthesize Bourdieu's and Foucault's insights with feminist critiques to demonstrate how reproductive governance unfolds across macro, meso, and micro levels. Practically, we argue for a shift from discretionary benefits to rights-based policies grounded in reproductive justice, centering the lived experiences of those whose reproductive needs fall outside normative models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"33 3","pages":"919-930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.70089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.70089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how workplace fertility governance operates as a system of control, consent, and inequality shaped by organizational, cultural, and institutional forces. Drawing on feminist theory, we develop a multilevel framework of cascading accountability that integrates symbolic violence, biopolitics, chrononormativity, and postfeminist agency to analyze how corporate fertility benefits simultaneously expand and constrain reproductive autonomy. Using feminist thematic analysis of media coverage, corporate materials, digital lived experiences, and independent reports, we show how fertility support schemes reinforce normative timelines, managerial control, and affective expectations, particularly for structurally marginalized groups such as migrants, LGBTQ+ workers, and racialized minorities. Throughout this paper, fertility governance is treated not as a women's issue per se but as a system regulating reproductive capacity across differently gendered bodies, including cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary workers. Theoretically, we synthesize Bourdieu's and Foucault's insights with feminist critiques to demonstrate how reproductive governance unfolds across macro, meso, and micro levels. Practically, we argue for a shift from discretionary benefits to rights-based policies grounded in reproductive justice, centering the lived experiences of those whose reproductive needs fall outside normative models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过级联问责制进行生育治理:为弱势工人建立包容性安全网
本文考察了工作场所生育治理是如何作为一个控制、同意和不平等的系统,由组织、文化和制度力量形成的。利用女权主义理论,我们开发了一个多层次的级联责任框架,该框架整合了符号暴力、生命政治、时间规范和后女权主义代理,以分析企业生育利益如何同时扩大和限制生育自主权。通过对媒体报道、企业材料、数字化生活体验和独立报道的女权主义主题分析,我们展示了生育支持计划如何强化规范时间表、管理控制和情感期望,特别是对移民、LGBTQ+工人和种族化少数群体等结构边缘化群体。在本文中,生育治理本身并不是一个妇女问题,而是一个调节不同性别群体(包括顺性别、跨性别和非二元性别工作者)生殖能力的系统。从理论上讲,我们将布迪厄和福柯的见解与女权主义批评结合起来,展示生殖治理如何在宏观、中观和微观层面展开。实际上,我们主张从可自由支配的福利转向以生殖正义为基础的基于权利的政策,以那些生殖需求超出规范模式的人的生活经验为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书