Efficiency of Seismic Intensity Measures for the Overturning Fragility Analysis of Rocking Rigid Blocks

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2026-04-03 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.1002/eqe.70142
Nicola A. Nodargi, Paolo Bisegna
{"title":"Efficiency of Seismic Intensity Measures for the Overturning Fragility Analysis of Rocking Rigid Blocks","authors":"Nicola A. Nodargi,&nbsp;Paolo Bisegna","doi":"10.1002/eqe.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The overturning fragility of free-standing rigid blocks under earthquake excitation is investigated to explore how seismic input and block geometry govern the rocking outcome. A large cloud dataset of rocking responses is generated by dynamic simulations using Housner's model for rocking. A lognormal fragility model, with median and dispersion parameters estimated by maximum likelihood, is then employed to characterize the overturning probability conditioned on a scalar intensity measure (IM) of seismic severity. A novel definition of efficiency is proposed to identify IMs that exhibit high predictive capability of the rocking outcome when a lognormal fragility model is employed. Robust metrics are introduced for quantitative assessment, thereby avoiding the potential misinterpretation that can arise from the usual use of the dispersion fragility parameter alone. Among a broad set of classical IMs, it is confirmed that velocity-based ones result the most efficient, with peak ground velocity delivering optimal calibration-discrimination trade-off. In a broader perspective, the proposed procedure provides a reliable methodological framework for assessing the efficiency of IMs in categorical seismic fragility analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"55 6","pages":"1434-1448"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.70142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overturning fragility of free-standing rigid blocks under earthquake excitation is investigated to explore how seismic input and block geometry govern the rocking outcome. A large cloud dataset of rocking responses is generated by dynamic simulations using Housner's model for rocking. A lognormal fragility model, with median and dispersion parameters estimated by maximum likelihood, is then employed to characterize the overturning probability conditioned on a scalar intensity measure (IM) of seismic severity. A novel definition of efficiency is proposed to identify IMs that exhibit high predictive capability of the rocking outcome when a lognormal fragility model is employed. Robust metrics are introduced for quantitative assessment, thereby avoiding the potential misinterpretation that can arise from the usual use of the dispersion fragility parameter alone. Among a broad set of classical IMs, it is confirmed that velocity-based ones result the most efficient, with peak ground velocity delivering optimal calibration-discrimination trade-off. In a broader perspective, the proposed procedure provides a reliable methodological framework for assessing the efficiency of IMs in categorical seismic fragility analysis.

地震烈度措施在摇摆刚性块体倾覆脆性分析中的有效性
研究了独立刚性块体在地震作用下的倾覆易损性,探讨了地震输入和块体几何形状对摇摆结果的影响。利用Housner的摇摆模型进行动态模拟,生成了一个大型的摇摆响应云数据集。然后,采用对数正态易损性模型,通过最大似然估计中值和离散参数,表征以地震严重程度的标量强度度量(IM)为条件的倾覆概率。提出了一种新的效率定义,用于识别在对数正态脆弱性模型中对摇摆结果表现出高预测能力的IMs。引入了稳健的指标进行定量评估,从而避免了由于通常单独使用离散脆弱性参数而产生的潜在误解。在一组广泛的经典IMs中,证实了基于速度的IMs效果最有效,峰值地面速度提供了最佳的校准-识别权衡。从更广泛的角度来看,所提出的程序为评估IMs在分类地震易损性分析中的效率提供了可靠的方法框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书