Aboriginal Peoples and Terrestrial Invertebrates in Australia: Historical and Cultural RelationshipsBy Philip A. Clarke, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. ISBN 9781486320431 334 pages, with 60 colour pictures

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Katja Hogendoorn, Gary Taylor
{"title":"Aboriginal Peoples and Terrestrial Invertebrates in Australia: Historical and Cultural RelationshipsBy Philip A. Clarke, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. ISBN 9781486320431 334 pages, with 60 colour pictures","authors":"Katja Hogendoorn,&nbsp;Gary Taylor","doi":"10.1111/aen.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aboriginal peoples have deep connections with Australia's terrestrial invertebrates. The different tribes value insects and other terrestrial arthropods as food, as totemic ancestors, creators and spirit beings, and as sources for materials and medicines. In this book anthropologist and ethnobiologist Philip Clarke, focuses on these nutritional, cultural and practical relationships.</p><p>Using a historian's approach, Clarke has consulted a very wide range of sources, including documents from early explorers, conversations with Aboriginal elders and scientific publications. Among these sources, the studies of two researchers feature prominently. Firstly, the publications of the very productive Norman Tindale (1900–1993) are heavily cited. Tindale was an anthropologist, but also a hepialid (Lepidoptera) taxonomist, a group that contains some of the species with ‘witchetty grub’ larvae (however, most witchetty grubs are cossid moths, and some are even cerambycid larvae—see below). Secondly, the work of Alan Yen (1950–2017) receives much attention. Alan was an entomologist, conservationist, and invertebrate ecologist and an active member of the Australian Entomological Society. The Society's conservation award is named in his honour. In addition to his focus on conservation Alan published papers on insects as human food.</p><p>Clarke's book brings together an immense number of terrestrial invertebrate species, and explores how they have been named, classified, foraged for, used, and celebrated by the many different Aboriginal cultures. For those interested in ethno-entomology, this overview of terrestrial invertebrates as sources of food, medicine, storytelling and spiritual significance for Aboriginal Peoples is a goldmine of information.</p><p>In the introductory chapter, the stark differences in the traditional Aboriginal knowledge of invertebrates as food and the European classification of a largely unknown invertebrate fauna is noted, together with cultural differences and disinclination of early explorers to record them as food (as opposed to hunting vertebrates).</p><p>Where possible, Clarke has included the current scientific names for the invertebrates mentioned. Not surprisingly, there were many profound difficulties in identifying the species or even their families. One of these problems was that at the time of the early explorers almost no Australian species had been described. This led to vague documentation and a tendency to refer Australian invertebrates using European classifications. For example, the early reports often referred to mygalomorph spiders as ‘Tarantulas’ but the same term could also indicate Wolf- or Huntsman spiders (collectively representing three different spider families). In addition, the spoken dialects were often incorrectly put into writing or wrongly translated into English. Furthermore, the classification itself could be sacred and hence not revealed, and local names could disappear, for example after a person with the same or a similar sounding name had died. Sadly, in many cases this cannot be traced back, because languages, as well as cultural knowledge have also disappeared. Clarke notes that ongoing collaboration between indigenous speakers, linguists and scientists is contributing to dictionaries, that together with reinforcement through lived experience, aims to increase the transmission of cultural knowledge.</p><p>This compendium of information is written factually and concisely, as text in sentence form. It occurred to us that much of the data could have been presented as a series of Tables, which may have made searching for specific information easier, but obviously would have been less entertaining to read!</p><p>In Chapter 2, it becomes clear that the various Indigenous classifications often neither matched each other nor the scientific ones. For example, some tribes classified food sources after the type of food: vertebrate, invertebrates and plants. Others classified them according to a range of different criteria such as behaviour, their place in the environment or their associations to plants. For example, criteria for classifications included: movement (leading to groupings of flying birds, bats and insects, slithering snakes and worms, and crawling beetles and spiders); the production of sound (Orthoptera, Cicadidae and tree frogs); the production of silk (various caterpillars and spiders); or production of sugar (sugarbag bees and honey ants). Then there were classifications based on place or ecological niche (e.g., whirligig beetles and turtles) or their plant host (e.g., witchetty grubs). The author warns against comparing the Indigenous and Western scientific perspective on classification and the environment in general, as one is dominated by ancestral traditions and life experiences, while the other is based on established scientific principles.</p><p>Chapter 3, titled ‘Terrestrial invertebrates as creators and spirit beings’ provides a selection of the wealth of Aboriginal Mythology on insects and allied arthropods. The chapter includes stories about invertebrates as creation ancestors and spirit beings. Many of these are invertebrate species that were either encountered often in daily life, or major sources of food, medicine and useful materials. The chapter contains stories about grubs and galls, caterpillars and butterflies, sugarbag bees, ants, termites, spiders and nuisance invertebrates such as lice, botflies, ticks, mosquitoes, leeches (including a ‘leech dreaming’!). We were surprised that the totemic systems of Aboriginal Australia were teeming with terrestrial invertebrates. This clearly reflects their fundamental importance for sustenance and survival and highlights their cultural significance.</p><p>The ensuing four chapters comprise regional information on foraging for certain groups of invertebrates. The chapters cover woodboring grubs (Chapter 4), moths (including the iconic ghost moths and bogong moths of southern temperate and alpine Australia, respectively), butterflies and galls (Chapter 5), bees (including anecdotal observations by Aboriginal peoples that the European honeybee had detrimentally affected native bees) and ants (Chapter 6), and termites, lerps and other terrestrial invertebrates (Chapter 7). As noted, the nomenclature used by Aboriginal people may often differ between adults and larvae of the same species (creating two ethnospecies from one biological species) or aggregating similar life forms, e.g., ‘grubs’ (forming one ethnospecies from multiple biological species). As well as recording the identity of species, each of these chapters detail their importance as a food source, laws and strategies around foraging and food preparation, as well as the environmental impact of foraging practises.</p><p>In Chapter 8 ‘Terrestrial invertebrates working for people’, details how terrestrial invertebrates were used for purposes other than a source of food. This included using distribution of ant nests to assess the likelihood of flooding, or forecasting seasonal change, studying the behaviour of wasps, bees and ants to find water, nectar or vertebrate prey. Furthermore, worms and insects, in particular larvae, were used as baits or lures for catching fish or even birds. Seeds were collected from ant granaries, which saved labour. Woodboring grubs, caterpillars, galls cockroaches and beetles were used to provide various skin and wound treatments. Termites and termite soil were used in a wide range of ways, maggots were used for cleaning wounds, and honey, pollen, eggs, wax and waste from sugarbag bees provided cures for general sickness, eye sores, festering wounds, and tinea.</p><p>Chapter 9, ‘Material culture’ features (among other applications) using ants to make glue, the many uses of bees wax, the use of wasps, ants and termite nests as sources of clay for hearths and earth ovens, and molluscs for tools and spider web for cord. In addition, the chapter includes cultural applications such as molluscs as ornaments, spider web as ritual tools, and dry hard galls as marbles. The chapter also briefly mentions the sacred imagery of invertebrate ancestors, as well as the importance of termites for making digeridoos.</p><p>The final chapter details the differences in attitude of Europeans and Aboriginal peoples regarding the consumption of terrestrial invertebrates, and explains that the development of a deeper understanding of Aboriginal relationships with terrestrial invertebrates serves an important contemporary need. It emphasises the symbolic importance of invertebrates such as the Yeperenye totem of central Australia, the frequent depiction of invertebrates such as witchetty grubs and honey ants in art and the enormous reliance on invertebrates as food. The chapter observes the growing popularity of ‘bush tucker’ as a niche market in ecotourism and the specialist restaurant industry, with a corresponding cautionary note on invertebrate conservation and the sustainability of ‘wild harvest’. The chapter concludes with the prophetic observation that invertebrates are integral to building and maintaining Indigenous cultural identities.</p><p>In summary, for persons with an interest in ethno-entomology this book is an absolute treasure trove of information, gleaned from a career-long accumulation of literature and observations. Each of these observations are meticulously cited at the end of each chapter, and referenced in full, with an impressive 978 references concluding the book! The book is illustrated with 60 colour images (as 30 colour plates) and well-illustrated with line drawings throughout the text. However, we do not only admire the book for its content—we are in awe of the way Clarke has managed to structure this plethora of very diverse facts. This is an admirable feat as, there are many tribes with different cultures and languages, very many terrestrial invertebrates, all with different distributions, requiring different foraging techniques and having different uses. Additionally, many of the explorers and early ethnobiologists did not have names for the invertebrates they found, and Philip Clarke has tried to attach current scientific names to all species. Importantly, this book explores, rather than ignores, the gaps between the knowledge systems of Indigenous peoples and Western science. It does so very respectfully, with the aim to encourage acknowledgement, understanding, and future collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8574,"journal":{"name":"Austral Entomology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aen.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.70070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aboriginal peoples have deep connections with Australia's terrestrial invertebrates. The different tribes value insects and other terrestrial arthropods as food, as totemic ancestors, creators and spirit beings, and as sources for materials and medicines. In this book anthropologist and ethnobiologist Philip Clarke, focuses on these nutritional, cultural and practical relationships.

Using a historian's approach, Clarke has consulted a very wide range of sources, including documents from early explorers, conversations with Aboriginal elders and scientific publications. Among these sources, the studies of two researchers feature prominently. Firstly, the publications of the very productive Norman Tindale (1900–1993) are heavily cited. Tindale was an anthropologist, but also a hepialid (Lepidoptera) taxonomist, a group that contains some of the species with ‘witchetty grub’ larvae (however, most witchetty grubs are cossid moths, and some are even cerambycid larvae—see below). Secondly, the work of Alan Yen (1950–2017) receives much attention. Alan was an entomologist, conservationist, and invertebrate ecologist and an active member of the Australian Entomological Society. The Society's conservation award is named in his honour. In addition to his focus on conservation Alan published papers on insects as human food.

Clarke's book brings together an immense number of terrestrial invertebrate species, and explores how they have been named, classified, foraged for, used, and celebrated by the many different Aboriginal cultures. For those interested in ethno-entomology, this overview of terrestrial invertebrates as sources of food, medicine, storytelling and spiritual significance for Aboriginal Peoples is a goldmine of information.

In the introductory chapter, the stark differences in the traditional Aboriginal knowledge of invertebrates as food and the European classification of a largely unknown invertebrate fauna is noted, together with cultural differences and disinclination of early explorers to record them as food (as opposed to hunting vertebrates).

Where possible, Clarke has included the current scientific names for the invertebrates mentioned. Not surprisingly, there were many profound difficulties in identifying the species or even their families. One of these problems was that at the time of the early explorers almost no Australian species had been described. This led to vague documentation and a tendency to refer Australian invertebrates using European classifications. For example, the early reports often referred to mygalomorph spiders as ‘Tarantulas’ but the same term could also indicate Wolf- or Huntsman spiders (collectively representing three different spider families). In addition, the spoken dialects were often incorrectly put into writing or wrongly translated into English. Furthermore, the classification itself could be sacred and hence not revealed, and local names could disappear, for example after a person with the same or a similar sounding name had died. Sadly, in many cases this cannot be traced back, because languages, as well as cultural knowledge have also disappeared. Clarke notes that ongoing collaboration between indigenous speakers, linguists and scientists is contributing to dictionaries, that together with reinforcement through lived experience, aims to increase the transmission of cultural knowledge.

This compendium of information is written factually and concisely, as text in sentence form. It occurred to us that much of the data could have been presented as a series of Tables, which may have made searching for specific information easier, but obviously would have been less entertaining to read!

In Chapter 2, it becomes clear that the various Indigenous classifications often neither matched each other nor the scientific ones. For example, some tribes classified food sources after the type of food: vertebrate, invertebrates and plants. Others classified them according to a range of different criteria such as behaviour, their place in the environment or their associations to plants. For example, criteria for classifications included: movement (leading to groupings of flying birds, bats and insects, slithering snakes and worms, and crawling beetles and spiders); the production of sound (Orthoptera, Cicadidae and tree frogs); the production of silk (various caterpillars and spiders); or production of sugar (sugarbag bees and honey ants). Then there were classifications based on place or ecological niche (e.g., whirligig beetles and turtles) or their plant host (e.g., witchetty grubs). The author warns against comparing the Indigenous and Western scientific perspective on classification and the environment in general, as one is dominated by ancestral traditions and life experiences, while the other is based on established scientific principles.

Chapter 3, titled ‘Terrestrial invertebrates as creators and spirit beings’ provides a selection of the wealth of Aboriginal Mythology on insects and allied arthropods. The chapter includes stories about invertebrates as creation ancestors and spirit beings. Many of these are invertebrate species that were either encountered often in daily life, or major sources of food, medicine and useful materials. The chapter contains stories about grubs and galls, caterpillars and butterflies, sugarbag bees, ants, termites, spiders and nuisance invertebrates such as lice, botflies, ticks, mosquitoes, leeches (including a ‘leech dreaming’!). We were surprised that the totemic systems of Aboriginal Australia were teeming with terrestrial invertebrates. This clearly reflects their fundamental importance for sustenance and survival and highlights their cultural significance.

The ensuing four chapters comprise regional information on foraging for certain groups of invertebrates. The chapters cover woodboring grubs (Chapter 4), moths (including the iconic ghost moths and bogong moths of southern temperate and alpine Australia, respectively), butterflies and galls (Chapter 5), bees (including anecdotal observations by Aboriginal peoples that the European honeybee had detrimentally affected native bees) and ants (Chapter 6), and termites, lerps and other terrestrial invertebrates (Chapter 7). As noted, the nomenclature used by Aboriginal people may often differ between adults and larvae of the same species (creating two ethnospecies from one biological species) or aggregating similar life forms, e.g., ‘grubs’ (forming one ethnospecies from multiple biological species). As well as recording the identity of species, each of these chapters detail their importance as a food source, laws and strategies around foraging and food preparation, as well as the environmental impact of foraging practises.

In Chapter 8 ‘Terrestrial invertebrates working for people’, details how terrestrial invertebrates were used for purposes other than a source of food. This included using distribution of ant nests to assess the likelihood of flooding, or forecasting seasonal change, studying the behaviour of wasps, bees and ants to find water, nectar or vertebrate prey. Furthermore, worms and insects, in particular larvae, were used as baits or lures for catching fish or even birds. Seeds were collected from ant granaries, which saved labour. Woodboring grubs, caterpillars, galls cockroaches and beetles were used to provide various skin and wound treatments. Termites and termite soil were used in a wide range of ways, maggots were used for cleaning wounds, and honey, pollen, eggs, wax and waste from sugarbag bees provided cures for general sickness, eye sores, festering wounds, and tinea.

Chapter 9, ‘Material culture’ features (among other applications) using ants to make glue, the many uses of bees wax, the use of wasps, ants and termite nests as sources of clay for hearths and earth ovens, and molluscs for tools and spider web for cord. In addition, the chapter includes cultural applications such as molluscs as ornaments, spider web as ritual tools, and dry hard galls as marbles. The chapter also briefly mentions the sacred imagery of invertebrate ancestors, as well as the importance of termites for making digeridoos.

The final chapter details the differences in attitude of Europeans and Aboriginal peoples regarding the consumption of terrestrial invertebrates, and explains that the development of a deeper understanding of Aboriginal relationships with terrestrial invertebrates serves an important contemporary need. It emphasises the symbolic importance of invertebrates such as the Yeperenye totem of central Australia, the frequent depiction of invertebrates such as witchetty grubs and honey ants in art and the enormous reliance on invertebrates as food. The chapter observes the growing popularity of ‘bush tucker’ as a niche market in ecotourism and the specialist restaurant industry, with a corresponding cautionary note on invertebrate conservation and the sustainability of ‘wild harvest’. The chapter concludes with the prophetic observation that invertebrates are integral to building and maintaining Indigenous cultural identities.

In summary, for persons with an interest in ethno-entomology this book is an absolute treasure trove of information, gleaned from a career-long accumulation of literature and observations. Each of these observations are meticulously cited at the end of each chapter, and referenced in full, with an impressive 978 references concluding the book! The book is illustrated with 60 colour images (as 30 colour plates) and well-illustrated with line drawings throughout the text. However, we do not only admire the book for its content—we are in awe of the way Clarke has managed to structure this plethora of very diverse facts. This is an admirable feat as, there are many tribes with different cultures and languages, very many terrestrial invertebrates, all with different distributions, requiring different foraging techniques and having different uses. Additionally, many of the explorers and early ethnobiologists did not have names for the invertebrates they found, and Philip Clarke has tried to attach current scientific names to all species. Importantly, this book explores, rather than ignores, the gaps between the knowledge systems of Indigenous peoples and Western science. It does so very respectfully, with the aim to encourage acknowledgement, understanding, and future collaboration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

《澳大利亚土著居民和陆生无脊椎动物:历史和文化关系》,作者:Philip A. Clarke, CSIRO出版社,墨尔本。ISBN 9781486320431 334页,附有60张彩色图片
土著人与澳大利亚的陆生无脊椎动物有着很深的联系。不同的部落将昆虫和其他陆生节肢动物视为食物、图腾祖先、创造者和精神存在,以及材料和药物的来源。在这本书中,人类学家和民族生物学家菲利普·克拉克专注于这些营养、文化和实际的关系。使用历史学家的方法,克拉克查阅了非常广泛的资料来源,包括早期探险家的文件,与土著长老的对话和科学出版物。在这些资料中,两位研究人员的研究尤为突出。首先,Norman Tindale(1900-1993)的著作被大量引用。廷代尔是一位人类学家,同时也是一位鳞翅目分类学家,这一类群包含了一些有“金翅虫”幼虫的物种(然而,大多数金翅虫是壳蛾,有些甚至是天牛幼虫——见下文)。其次,甄子丹(Alan Yen, 1950-2017)的作品备受关注。艾伦是昆虫学家、自然资源保护主义者、无脊椎动物生态学家,也是澳大利亚昆虫学会的活跃成员。协会的自然保护奖就是以他的名字命名的。除了关注保护昆虫,艾伦还发表了关于昆虫作为人类食物的论文。克拉克的书汇集了大量陆生无脊椎动物物种,并探讨了许多不同的土著文化是如何命名、分类、觅食、使用和庆祝这些物种的。对于那些对民族昆虫学感兴趣的人来说,这篇关于陆地无脊椎动物作为土著人食物、药物、故事和精神意义来源的概述是一座信息的金矿。在引言部分,作者指出了土著居民对无脊椎动物作为食物的传统认识与欧洲对大部分未知无脊椎动物的分类之间的明显差异,以及文化差异和早期探险家不愿将它们记录为食物(与狩猎脊椎动物相反)。在可能的情况下,克拉克已经包括了所提到的无脊椎动物的当前科学名称。毫不奇怪,在确定物种甚至它们的家庭方面存在许多深刻的困难。其中一个问题是,在早期探险者的时代,几乎没有澳大利亚物种被描述过。这导致了模糊的文献和使用欧洲分类参考澳大利亚无脊椎动物的倾向。例如,早期的报告经常将mygalomorph蜘蛛称为“Tarantulas”,但同样的术语也可以指狼蛛或猎人蜘蛛(统称为三种不同的蜘蛛科)。此外,口语方言经常被错误地写成文字或错误地翻译成英语。此外,分类本身可能是神圣的,因此不会被披露,而当地的名字可能会消失,例如在一个名字相同或发音相似的人去世后。可悲的是,在许多情况下,这无法追溯到,因为语言和文化知识也消失了。Clarke指出,土著使用者、语言学家和科学家之间正在进行的合作正在为词典做出贡献,再加上通过生活经验的强化,旨在增加文化知识的传播。本信息摘要以句子形式的文本形式,简明扼要地书写。我们突然想到,许多数据可以以一系列表格的形式呈现,这可能会使搜索特定信息变得更容易,但显然阅读起来会不那么有趣!在第二章中,很明显,各种土著分类往往既不匹配,也不科学。例如,一些部落将食物来源按照食物类型分类:脊椎动物、无脊椎动物和植物。其他人根据一系列不同的标准对它们进行分类,比如行为、它们在环境中的位置或它们与植物的关系。例如,分类标准包括:运动(导致飞行的鸟类,蝙蝠和昆虫,滑动的蛇和蠕虫,爬行的甲虫和蜘蛛的分组);发声(直翅目、蝉科、树蛙);产丝(各种毛毛虫和蜘蛛);或者生产糖(糖袋蜂和蜜蚁)。然后是基于地点或生态位(例如,旋转甲虫和海龟)或它们的植物宿主(例如,巫妖蛴螬)的分类。作者警告不要将土著和西方的科学观点在分类和一般环境方面进行比较,因为一种观点是由祖先的传统和生活经验主导的,而另一种观点是基于既定的科学原则。 第三章,题为“陆地无脊椎动物作为创造者和精神存在”,提供了关于昆虫和节肢动物的土著神话财富的选择。这一章包括无脊椎动物作为创造祖先和精神存在的故事。其中许多是无脊椎动物,它们要么在日常生活中经常遇到,要么是食物、药物和有用材料的主要来源。这一章包含了关于幼虫和瘿虫、毛毛虫和蝴蝶、糖袋蜂、蚂蚁、白蚁、蜘蛛和讨厌的无脊椎动物,如虱子、botflies、ticks、蚊子、水蛭(包括“水蛭做梦”!)的故事。令我们惊讶的是,澳大利亚土著的图腾系统中充满了陆生无脊椎动物。这清楚地反映了它们对维持和生存的根本重要性,并突出了它们的文化意义。接下来的四章包括某些无脊椎动物群体觅食的区域信息。这些章节包括蛀木蛴螬(第4章)、飞蛾(分别包括澳大利亚南温带和高山地区标志性的鬼蛾和波宫蛾)、蝴蝶和瘿虫(第5章)、蜜蜂(包括土著居民关于欧洲蜜蜂对本地蜜蜂造成不利影响的轶事观察)和蚂蚁(第6章)、白蚁、麻风和其他陆生无脊椎动物(第7章)。如前所述,土著居民使用的命名法可能经常在同一物种的成虫和幼虫之间有所不同(从一个生物物种中产生两个种族),或者聚集相似的生命形式,例如,“蛴螬”(从多个生物物种中形成一个种族)。除了记录物种的身份外,每一章都详细介绍了它们作为食物来源的重要性,觅食和食物准备的法律和策略,以及觅食行为对环境的影响。在第8章“为人类工作的陆生无脊椎动物”中,详细介绍了陆生无脊椎动物是如何被用作食物来源以外的其他用途的。这包括利用蚁巢的分布来评估洪水的可能性,或预测季节变化,研究黄蜂、蜜蜂和蚂蚁寻找水、花蜜或脊椎动物猎物的行为。此外,蠕虫和昆虫,特别是幼虫,被用作鱼饵或诱饵来捕捉鱼甚至鸟。种子是从蚂蚁的粮仓里收集的,这节省了劳动力。木材蛀虫,毛虫,蟑螂和甲虫被用来提供各种皮肤和伤口治疗。白蚁和白蚁土被广泛应用,蛆虫被用来清洁伤口,糖袋蜂的蜂蜜、花粉、卵、蜡和粪便被用来治疗一般疾病、眼疮、溃烂的伤口和癣。第9章,“物质文化”介绍了(在其他应用中)使用蚂蚁制造胶水,蜂蜡的多种用途,使用黄蜂、蚂蚁和白蚁巢穴作为壁炉和土炉的粘土来源,使用软体动物作为工具,使用蜘蛛网作为绳子。此外,这一章还包括作为装饰品的软体动物,作为仪式工具的蜘蛛网,以及作为大理石的干硬瘿等文化应用。这一章还简要地提到了无脊椎动物祖先的神圣形象,以及白蚁对制作digeridoos的重要性。最后一章详细说明了欧洲人和土著居民对陆地无脊椎动物消费态度的差异,并解释了对土著与陆地无脊椎动物关系的更深入理解的发展是当代重要的需要。它强调了无脊椎动物的象征意义,如澳大利亚中部的Yeperenye图腾,在艺术中经常描绘无脊椎动物,如金蛆和蜜蚁,以及对无脊椎动物作为食物的巨大依赖。这一章观察到“丛林食物”作为生态旅游和专业餐饮业的利基市场越来越受欢迎,并对无脊椎动物保护和“野生收获”的可持续性提出了相应的警告。本章以预言性的观察结束,无脊椎动物是建立和维护土著文化身份不可或缺的一部分。总之,对于那些对民族昆虫学感兴趣的人来说,这本书绝对是一个信息宝库,它是从我职业生涯中积累的文献和观察中收集到的。每一个观察结果都在每一章的末尾被精心地引用,并被完整地引用,令人印象深刻的978个参考文献结束了这本书!这本书配有60张彩色图片(如30张彩色板),并在整个文本中配有精美的线条图。然而,我们不仅欣赏这本书的内容,我们对克拉克设法组织这些大量不同事实的方式感到敬畏。 这是一项令人钦佩的壮举,因为有许多部落有着不同的文化和语言,有很多陆生无脊椎动物,它们都有不同的分布,需要不同的觅食技术,有不同的用途。此外,许多探险家和早期的民族生物学家没有给他们发现的无脊椎动物起名字,菲利普·克拉克试图给所有的物种都取一个现在的学名。重要的是,这本书探索而不是忽视了土著人民的知识体系与西方科学之间的差距。它这样做是非常尊重的,目的是鼓励承认、理解和未来的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Entomology
Austral Entomology ENTOMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Austral Entomology is a scientific journal of entomology for the Southern Hemisphere. It publishes Original Articles that are peer-reviewed research papers from the study of the behaviour, biology, biosystematics, conservation biology, ecology, evolution, forensic and medical entomology, molecular biology, public health, urban entomology, physiology and the use and control of insects, arachnids and myriapods. The journal also publishes Reviews on research and theory or commentaries on current areas of research, innovation or rapid development likely to be of broad interest – these may be submitted or invited. Book Reviews will also be considered provided the works are of global significance. Manuscripts from authors in the Northern Hemisphere are encouraged provided that the research has relevance to or broad readership within the Southern Hemisphere. All submissions are peer-reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper. Special issues are encouraged; please contact the Chief Editor for further information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书