Year-round colony-level differences in foraging behaviour and diel activity of yellow-legged gulls from natural and urban colonies

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2026-03-30 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI:10.1111/jzo.70092
R. R. Fernandes, J. A. Ramos, J. P. de Faria, D. M. Matos, I. dos Santos, N. Oliveira, P. Rodrigues, V. H. Paiva
{"title":"Year-round colony-level differences in foraging behaviour and diel activity of yellow-legged gulls from natural and urban colonies","authors":"R. R. Fernandes,&nbsp;J. A. Ramos,&nbsp;J. P. de Faria,&nbsp;D. M. Matos,&nbsp;I. dos Santos,&nbsp;N. Oliveira,&nbsp;P. Rodrigues,&nbsp;V. H. Paiva","doi":"10.1111/jzo.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urbanisation has led to increased populations of opportunistic species like gulls, driven by the availability of anthropogenic resources. However, gulls may exhibit distinct foraging strategies, spatially and temporally, especially when foraging in urban <i>versus</i> natural habitats. We compared the spatial ecology of yellow-legged gulls <i>Larus michahellis</i> from Porto (urban) and Berlenga Island (natural), using GPS-GSM transmitters to track foraging behaviour across breeding and wintering seasons. Our data revealed that gulls from Berlenga travelled farther and took longer foraging trips, while urban gulls showed little seasonal dispersion, highlighting urban influences on foraging. Urban gulls favoured urban habitats, while natural colony gulls foraged primarily at sea and in fishing harbours, though individual differences were observed. Despite not differing greatly between workdays and weekends, daily rhythms revealed distinct patterns among habitats used and between colonies, implying that gulls adapted their foraging activity to match human routines. Our findings indicate that variation in the foraging ecology and distribution of yellow-legged gulls is related to the characteristics of each breeding site and that human activity and consequent environmental changes influence the behaviour of these natural and urban-dwelling birds in different ways.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"328 3","pages":"256-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.70092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.70092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urbanisation has led to increased populations of opportunistic species like gulls, driven by the availability of anthropogenic resources. However, gulls may exhibit distinct foraging strategies, spatially and temporally, especially when foraging in urban versus natural habitats. We compared the spatial ecology of yellow-legged gulls Larus michahellis from Porto (urban) and Berlenga Island (natural), using GPS-GSM transmitters to track foraging behaviour across breeding and wintering seasons. Our data revealed that gulls from Berlenga travelled farther and took longer foraging trips, while urban gulls showed little seasonal dispersion, highlighting urban influences on foraging. Urban gulls favoured urban habitats, while natural colony gulls foraged primarily at sea and in fishing harbours, though individual differences were observed. Despite not differing greatly between workdays and weekends, daily rhythms revealed distinct patterns among habitats used and between colonies, implying that gulls adapted their foraging activity to match human routines. Our findings indicate that variation in the foraging ecology and distribution of yellow-legged gulls is related to the characteristics of each breeding site and that human activity and consequent environmental changes influence the behaviour of these natural and urban-dwelling birds in different ways.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自然和城市黄腿鸥觅食行为和饮食活动的全年种群水平差异
在人为资源的驱动下,城市化导致了海鸥等机会主义物种的数量增加。然而,海鸥可能在空间和时间上表现出不同的觅食策略,特别是在城市和自然栖息地觅食时。我们比较了波尔图(城市)和伯伦加岛(自然)黄腿鸥的空间生态,使用GPS-GSM发射机跟踪繁殖期和越冬期的觅食行为。我们的数据显示,来自Berlenga的海鸥飞行距离更远,觅食行程更长,而城市海鸥的季节性分散较小,突出了城市对觅食的影响。城市海鸥偏好城市栖息地,而自然种群海鸥主要在海上和渔港觅食,尽管观察到个体差异。尽管工作日和周末之间没有太大的差异,但在不同的栖息地和不同的群落之间,日常节律显示出不同的模式,这意味着海鸥调整了它们的觅食活动,以适应人类的日常活动。研究结果表明,黄腿鸥觅食生态和分布的变化与各个繁殖地的特征有关,人类活动和随之而来的环境变化以不同的方式影响着这些自然鸟类和城市鸟类的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书