Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure in the ICU

Journal of intensive medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jointm.2025.10.010
Yunpeng Xu , Ting Lei , Zi Yang , Hong Guo , Lei Zhu , Jianlin Wang , Hao Liu , Tianhu Liang , Qinglin Lin , Guang Yao , Zhiqiang Yao , Jian Liu
{"title":"Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure in the ICU","authors":"Yunpeng Xu ,&nbsp;Ting Lei ,&nbsp;Zi Yang ,&nbsp;Hong Guo ,&nbsp;Lei Zhu ,&nbsp;Jianlin Wang ,&nbsp;Hao Liu ,&nbsp;Tianhu Liang ,&nbsp;Qinglin Lin ,&nbsp;Guang Yao ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Yao ,&nbsp;Jian Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2025.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and severe condition among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), associated with high mortality. Accurate prediction of short-term outcomes is crucial for optimizing clinical decisions and treatment strategies. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the 28-day mortality risk in ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v3.1) database as the training cohort, and patients from the eICU-CRD (v2.0) database as the external validation cohort. Candidate predictors were initially identified based on clinical guidelines and expert consensus, and the Boruta algorithm was applied to determine the optimal feature set. Seven ML algorithms, namely random forest, XGBoost, logistic regression, AdaBoost, gradient boosting, CatBoost, and neural network, were compared. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. To enhance interpretability, feature importance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. These results were integrated to construct a practical prognostic prediction platform.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The training cohort (2975 deaths) comprised 12,597 ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF from the MIMIC-IV (v3.1) database, while 890 patients from the eICU-CRD (v2.0) database (102 deaths) were included for external validation. Among the ML models, XGBoost achieved the best performance in the training cohort (AUC: 0.812; accuracy: 0.772; sensitivity: 0.605; specificity: 0.823). In the external validation cohort, XGBoost demonstrated good generalizability (AUC: 0.714). SHAP analysis identified PaO₂, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, age, Acute Physiology Score (APS) III, lactate, urine output, and respiratory rate as the most influential predictors of 28-day mortality. Accordingly, a short-term mortality prediction platform was developed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We successfully developed an efficient, interpretable predictive model based on the XGBoost algorithm, accurately predicting 28-day mortality risk for ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF. Demonstrating stable performance and strong generalizability, this model holds promise as a clinical decision-support tool for the early identification of high-risk patients and optimization of personalized treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 175-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X25000957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and severe condition among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), associated with high mortality. Accurate prediction of short-term outcomes is crucial for optimizing clinical decisions and treatment strategies. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the 28-day mortality risk in ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF.

Methods

This retrospective study included ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v3.1) database as the training cohort, and patients from the eICU-CRD (v2.0) database as the external validation cohort. Candidate predictors were initially identified based on clinical guidelines and expert consensus, and the Boruta algorithm was applied to determine the optimal feature set. Seven ML algorithms, namely random forest, XGBoost, logistic regression, AdaBoost, gradient boosting, CatBoost, and neural network, were compared. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. To enhance interpretability, feature importance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. These results were integrated to construct a practical prognostic prediction platform.

Results

The training cohort (2975 deaths) comprised 12,597 ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF from the MIMIC-IV (v3.1) database, while 890 patients from the eICU-CRD (v2.0) database (102 deaths) were included for external validation. Among the ML models, XGBoost achieved the best performance in the training cohort (AUC: 0.812; accuracy: 0.772; sensitivity: 0.605; specificity: 0.823). In the external validation cohort, XGBoost demonstrated good generalizability (AUC: 0.714). SHAP analysis identified PaO₂, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, age, Acute Physiology Score (APS) III, lactate, urine output, and respiratory rate as the most influential predictors of 28-day mortality. Accordingly, a short-term mortality prediction platform was developed.

Conclusions

We successfully developed an efficient, interpretable predictive model based on the XGBoost algorithm, accurately predicting 28-day mortality risk for ICU patients with sepsis complicated by ARF. Demonstrating stable performance and strong generalizability, this model holds promise as a clinical decision-support tool for the early identification of high-risk patients and optimization of personalized treatments.
用于预测ICU脓毒症合并急性呼吸衰竭患者28天死亡风险的机器学习模型的开发和外部验证
脓毒症并发急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)是重症监护病房(ICU)患者常见且严重的疾病,与高死亡率相关。准确预测短期结果对于优化临床决策和治疗策略至关重要。因此,我们旨在开发并验证可解释的机器学习(ML)模型,以预测ICU脓毒症合并ARF患者的28天死亡风险。方法回顾性研究纳入重症监护医学信息市场IV (MIMIC-IV, v3.1)数据库中的ICU脓毒症合并ARF患者作为训练队列,eICU-CRD (v2.0)数据库中的患者作为外部验证队列。根据临床指南和专家共识初步确定候选预测因子,并应用Boruta算法确定最佳特征集。比较了随机森林、XGBoost、逻辑回归、AdaBoost、梯度增强、CatBoost和神经网络等7种ML算法。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值来评估模型的性能。为了提高可解释性,使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析评估特征重要性。综合这些结果,构建一个实用的预后预测平台。结果训练队列(2975例死亡)包括来自MIMIC-IV (v3.1)数据库的12,597例脓毒症合并ARF的ICU患者,而来自eICU-CRD (v2.0)数据库的890例患者(102例死亡)纳入外部验证。其中,XGBoost在训练队列中表现最好(AUC: 0.812,准确率:0.772,灵敏度:0.605,特异性:0.823)。在外部验证队列中,XGBoost表现出良好的泛化性(AUC: 0.714)。SHAP分析发现PaO₂、丙氨酸转氨酶、白蛋白、年龄、急性生理评分(APS) III、乳酸、尿量和呼吸频率是28天死亡率最具影响的预测因素。据此,开发了短期死亡率预测平台。结论基于XGBoost算法成功建立了高效、可解释的预测模型,可准确预测ICU脓毒症合并ARF患者28天死亡风险。该模型性能稳定,通用性强,有望成为早期识别高危患者、优化个性化治疗的临床决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书