Phage receptor specificity drives cross-resistance patterns and governs fitness trade-offs during sequential resistance acquisition in Salmonella.

Yingting Wu,Jing Yu,Weilai Tao,Jie Wu,Yumeng Gan,Yuxuan Wang,Xin Zhao,Xiaojing Hao,Qian Zhang,Hongning Wang,Anyun Zhang
{"title":"Phage receptor specificity drives cross-resistance patterns and governs fitness trade-offs during sequential resistance acquisition in Salmonella.","authors":"Yingting Wu,Jing Yu,Weilai Tao,Jie Wu,Yumeng Gan,Yuxuan Wang,Xin Zhao,Xiaojing Hao,Qian Zhang,Hongning Wang,Anyun Zhang","doi":"10.1093/ismejo/wrag077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phages infect bacteria by binding to specific surface receptors, driving co-evolution in microbial communities and offering therapeutic potential. However, how receptor specificity shapes the cross-resistance patterns and evolutionary trade-offs during phage-bacteria co-evolution remains unclear. Here, we investigated the genetic basis and fitness trade-offs of phage resistance in Salmonella to phages targeting O-antigen, core oligosaccharide, and BtuB (TonB-dependent receptor for vitamin B12) under individual or combinatorial pressures. The interaction matrices between phage-resistant strains and phages targeting three different receptors showed that bacterial cross-resistance to phages depends on the receptor type. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) truncation conferred cross-resistance to phages targeting either the O-antigen or core oligosaccharide; whereas resistance to phages targeting BtuB occurred exclusively through mutations in the btuB gene. For LPS receptors whose biosynthesis involves multiple genes, the fitness cost associated with phage resistance is gene-specific. Among mutations conferring resistance to both O-antigen-targeting and core-targeting phages, those in the rfaJ gene exhibited the lowest fitness cost. The three-phage combination targeting three receptors exhibited potent antibacterial effects. Under this selective pressure, Salmonella developed resistance through receptor modification. Resistance to O-antigen-targeting and core-targeting phages emerged first through mutations in LPS biosynthesis genes, with mutations in the rfaJ gene dominating. Subsequently, mutations in the btuB gene accumulated to resist BtuB-targeting phages, ultimately evading predation by all three phages. Our results reveal receptor-driven evolutionary trade-offs and sequential resistance acquisition in Salmonella under multiple phages pressure, enhancing understanding of microbial interactions and informing phage therapy strategies.","PeriodicalId":516554,"journal":{"name":"The ISME Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ISME Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrag077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phages infect bacteria by binding to specific surface receptors, driving co-evolution in microbial communities and offering therapeutic potential. However, how receptor specificity shapes the cross-resistance patterns and evolutionary trade-offs during phage-bacteria co-evolution remains unclear. Here, we investigated the genetic basis and fitness trade-offs of phage resistance in Salmonella to phages targeting O-antigen, core oligosaccharide, and BtuB (TonB-dependent receptor for vitamin B12) under individual or combinatorial pressures. The interaction matrices between phage-resistant strains and phages targeting three different receptors showed that bacterial cross-resistance to phages depends on the receptor type. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) truncation conferred cross-resistance to phages targeting either the O-antigen or core oligosaccharide; whereas resistance to phages targeting BtuB occurred exclusively through mutations in the btuB gene. For LPS receptors whose biosynthesis involves multiple genes, the fitness cost associated with phage resistance is gene-specific. Among mutations conferring resistance to both O-antigen-targeting and core-targeting phages, those in the rfaJ gene exhibited the lowest fitness cost. The three-phage combination targeting three receptors exhibited potent antibacterial effects. Under this selective pressure, Salmonella developed resistance through receptor modification. Resistance to O-antigen-targeting and core-targeting phages emerged first through mutations in LPS biosynthesis genes, with mutations in the rfaJ gene dominating. Subsequently, mutations in the btuB gene accumulated to resist BtuB-targeting phages, ultimately evading predation by all three phages. Our results reveal receptor-driven evolutionary trade-offs and sequential resistance acquisition in Salmonella under multiple phages pressure, enhancing understanding of microbial interactions and informing phage therapy strategies.
噬菌体受体特异性驱动交叉抗性模式,并在沙门氏菌连续抗性获取过程中控制适应性权衡。
噬菌体通过结合特定的表面受体感染细菌,推动微生物群落的共同进化,并提供治疗潜力。然而,受体特异性如何在噬菌体-细菌共同进化过程中形成交叉抗性模式和进化权衡仍不清楚。在这里,我们研究了沙门氏菌噬菌体在个体或组合压力下对o抗原、核心寡糖和BtuB(维生素B12的tonb依赖性受体)噬菌体的抗性的遗传基础和适应性权衡。噬菌体耐药菌株与靶向三种不同受体的噬菌体之间的相互作用基质表明,细菌对噬菌体的交叉抗性取决于受体类型。脂多糖(LPS)截断可使噬菌体对o抗原或核心寡糖产生交叉抗性;而对靶向BtuB的噬菌体的抗性仅通过BtuB基因的突变发生。对于生物合成涉及多个基因的LPS受体,与噬菌体抗性相关的适应度成本是基因特异性的。在对o抗原靶向和核心靶向噬菌体均具有抗性的突变中,rfaJ基因的适应度成本最低。靶向三种受体的噬菌体组合具有较强的抗菌作用。在这种选择压力下,沙门氏菌通过受体修饰产生了耐药性。对o抗原靶向和核心靶向噬菌体的耐药性首先通过LPS生物合成基因突变出现,其中rfaJ基因突变占主导地位。随后,btuB基因的突变积累以抵抗btuB靶向噬菌体,最终避免了所有三种噬菌体的捕食。我们的研究结果揭示了受体驱动的进化权衡和沙门氏菌在多种噬菌体压力下的顺序抗性获得,增强了对微生物相互作用的理解,并为噬菌体治疗策略提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书