Wearing an Arm Support Exoskeleton Does Not Affect Balance but May Decrease Dynamic Stability During a Step-Down Maneuver.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Human Factors Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-11 DOI:10.1177/00187208261441959
Federico Arippa, Alan Barr, Brandon Phillips, Sunwook Kim, Maury A Nussbaum, Carisa Harris-Adamson
{"title":"Wearing an Arm Support Exoskeleton Does Not Affect Balance but May Decrease Dynamic Stability During a Step-Down Maneuver.","authors":"Federico Arippa, Alan Barr, Brandon Phillips, Sunwook Kim, Maury A Nussbaum, Carisa Harris-Adamson","doi":"10.1177/00187208261441959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveAssess the effects of arm support exoskeletons (ASEs) on dynamic balance during dynamic tasks.BackgroundASEs can reduce muscle activation during labor-intensive tasks, potentially alleviating fatigue, discomfort, and injury risk. However, implications on worker safety, particularly regarding altered balance, remain a concern.MethodsWe evaluated the effects of three different ASEs on dynamic balance using postural sway parameters and the dynamic postural stability index (DPSI). Twenty-three healthy volunteers (7 F) performed a single-leg, step-down maneuver with and without ASEs.ResultsSway did not differ substantially across conditions, except for a slight increase in sway area in one comparison (18.3%, <i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup>≈0.07). In contrast, DPSI increased in all ASE conditions compared to no-ASE (6.1-10.1%, <i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup>≈0.05-0.10). A main effect of sex was found for sway and dynamic stability metrics, with females exhibiting greater postural excursions (13.5% higher sway and 9.3% higher DPSI on average, <i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup> up to 0.24). Height and body mass were negatively correlated with sway and DPSI parameters, suggesting a potential role of individual anthropometrics in modulating balance performance.ConclusionASEs do not impair balance during dynamic tasks such as a step-down maneuver and single-leg stance, but they may affect stabilization strategies, especially for individuals with low body mass and height.ApplicationThese findings support the potential for a cautious integration of ASEs in industrial settings, as these devices appear to have a minimal impact on balance during moderately dynamic tasks, but observed differences in DPSI highlight the need for careful evaluation in specific populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"1148-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13385638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261441959","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveAssess the effects of arm support exoskeletons (ASEs) on dynamic balance during dynamic tasks.BackgroundASEs can reduce muscle activation during labor-intensive tasks, potentially alleviating fatigue, discomfort, and injury risk. However, implications on worker safety, particularly regarding altered balance, remain a concern.MethodsWe evaluated the effects of three different ASEs on dynamic balance using postural sway parameters and the dynamic postural stability index (DPSI). Twenty-three healthy volunteers (7 F) performed a single-leg, step-down maneuver with and without ASEs.ResultsSway did not differ substantially across conditions, except for a slight increase in sway area in one comparison (18.3%, ηp2≈0.07). In contrast, DPSI increased in all ASE conditions compared to no-ASE (6.1-10.1%, ηp2≈0.05-0.10). A main effect of sex was found for sway and dynamic stability metrics, with females exhibiting greater postural excursions (13.5% higher sway and 9.3% higher DPSI on average, ηp2 up to 0.24). Height and body mass were negatively correlated with sway and DPSI parameters, suggesting a potential role of individual anthropometrics in modulating balance performance.ConclusionASEs do not impair balance during dynamic tasks such as a step-down maneuver and single-leg stance, but they may affect stabilization strategies, especially for individuals with low body mass and height.ApplicationThese findings support the potential for a cautious integration of ASEs in industrial settings, as these devices appear to have a minimal impact on balance during moderately dynamic tasks, but observed differences in DPSI highlight the need for careful evaluation in specific populations.

佩戴手臂支撑外骨骼不会影响平衡,但可能会在减速机动过程中降低动态稳定性。
目的评估臂支撑外骨骼(ase)对动态任务中动态平衡的影响。背景:在劳动密集型任务中,酶可以减少肌肉的激活,潜在地减轻疲劳、不适和受伤风险。然而,对工人安全的影响,特别是关于平衡的改变,仍然是一个问题。方法采用姿态摇摆参数和动态姿态稳定指数(DPSI)评价三种不同的asa对动态平衡的影响。23名健康志愿者(7名F)在有或没有as的情况下进行单腿降压动作。结果不同条件下,除有一种情况下,摇摆面积略有增加(18.3%,ηp2≈0.07)外,其余情况无显著差异。与无ASE相比,所有ASE患者DPSI均升高(6.1-10.1%,ηp2≈0.05-0.10)。性别对摇摆和动态稳定性指标有主要影响,女性表现出更大的姿势偏移(摆动高13.5%,DPSI平均高9.3%,ηp2高达0.24)。身高和体重与摇摆和DPSI参数呈负相关,这表明个体人体测量学在调节平衡性能方面具有潜在作用。结论:在动态任务(如降压动作和单腿站立)中,asa不会损害平衡,但可能会影响稳定策略,特别是对于低体重和低身高的个体。这些研究结果支持了在工业环境中谨慎整合asa的可能性,因为这些设备在中度动态任务中对平衡的影响最小,但观察到DPSI的差异强调了在特定人群中进行仔细评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书