Efficacy of 5% dextrose prolotherapy compared with saline injections for chondromalacia patella: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-11 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.70119
Yunus Burak Bayır, Özlem Köroğlu, Yasin Demir
{"title":"Efficacy of 5% dextrose prolotherapy compared with saline injections for chondromalacia patella: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yunus Burak Bayır, Özlem Köroğlu, Yasin Demir","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of 5% dextrose prolotherapy applied to patients with chondromalacia patella.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This 2-arm, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled interventional study in a single center included 54 patients with knee pain ongoing for at least 3 months. The patients were randomly assigned to a dextrose prolotherapy group (DPG) or a saline group (SG). Periarticular 5% dextrose prolotherapy or saline injections were applied to these groups, respectively, at 0, 3, and 6 weeks. The outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale (PPSS), Kujala Patellofemoral Scoring System (KPSS), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at baseline and at the end of the 3rd, 6th, and 24th weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 patients were included, with 27 in each group. After the withdrawal of 2, evaluation was made of 52 patients. Compared to baseline values, the VAS, PPSS scores, and number of tender points significantly decreased (p < .001 for all), and the KPSS and SF-36 scores increased at the end of weeks 3, 6, and 24 in both groups (p = .003 for the SF-36 mental health subscale and p < .001 in all other evaluations). At 24 weeks, in the DPG compared to SG, VAS was 1.67 points lower (95% CI: -2.57 to -7.80; p < .001), PPSS was 15.4 points lower (95% CI: -23.6 to -7.18; p < .001), KPSS was 9.3 points higher (95% CI: 5.3-13.2; p < .001), the number of tender points was 0.79 points lower (95% CI: -1.4 to -0.12; p < .021), and the physical function SF-36 subscale was 7.8 points higher (95% CI: 3.6-12.7; p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with chondromalacia patella, 5% dextrose prolotherapy reduced pain and improved symptoms, functional status, and quality of life more effectively than saline injections. Therefore, 5% dextrose prolotherapy can be recommended as an effective treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"1133-1144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of 5% dextrose prolotherapy applied to patients with chondromalacia patella.

Design: This 2-arm, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled interventional study in a single center included 54 patients with knee pain ongoing for at least 3 months. The patients were randomly assigned to a dextrose prolotherapy group (DPG) or a saline group (SG). Periarticular 5% dextrose prolotherapy or saline injections were applied to these groups, respectively, at 0, 3, and 6 weeks. The outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale (PPSS), Kujala Patellofemoral Scoring System (KPSS), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at baseline and at the end of the 3rd, 6th, and 24th weeks.

Results: A total of 54 patients were included, with 27 in each group. After the withdrawal of 2, evaluation was made of 52 patients. Compared to baseline values, the VAS, PPSS scores, and number of tender points significantly decreased (p < .001 for all), and the KPSS and SF-36 scores increased at the end of weeks 3, 6, and 24 in both groups (p = .003 for the SF-36 mental health subscale and p < .001 in all other evaluations). At 24 weeks, in the DPG compared to SG, VAS was 1.67 points lower (95% CI: -2.57 to -7.80; p < .001), PPSS was 15.4 points lower (95% CI: -23.6 to -7.18; p < .001), KPSS was 9.3 points higher (95% CI: 5.3-13.2; p < .001), the number of tender points was 0.79 points lower (95% CI: -1.4 to -0.12; p < .021), and the physical function SF-36 subscale was 7.8 points higher (95% CI: 3.6-12.7; p < .001).

Conclusion: In patients with chondromalacia patella, 5% dextrose prolotherapy reduced pain and improved symptoms, functional status, and quality of life more effectively than saline injections. Therefore, 5% dextrose prolotherapy can be recommended as an effective treatment option.

5%葡萄糖前驱疗法与生理盐水注射治疗髌骨软化症的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
目的:探讨5%葡萄糖前驱治疗髌骨软化症的疗效。设计:这项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照、单中心介入研究纳入了54例膝关节疼痛持续至少3个月的患者。患者随机分为葡萄糖前驱治疗组(DPG)和生理盐水组(SG)。分别于0、3、6周给予关节周围5%葡萄糖前驱治疗或生理盐水注射。结果测量是视觉模拟量表(VAS)、髌骨疼痛严重程度量表(PPSS)、Kujala髌骨评分系统(KPSS)以及基线和第3、6和24周末的短表36 (SF-36)。结果:共纳入54例患者,每组27例。停药后,对52例患者进行评估。与基线值相比,VAS评分、PPSS评分和压痛点数量显著降低(p)。结论:在髌骨软骨软化症患者中,5%葡萄糖前驱治疗比生理盐水注射更有效地减轻疼痛,改善症状、功能状态和生活质量。因此,5%葡萄糖前驱治疗可作为一种有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书