Health workers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices relating to antimicrobial use and resistance in cross river state, Nigeria: a cross sectional study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Akaninyene Asuquo Otu, Obiageli Chiezey Onwusaka, Ubong Aniefiok Udoh, Ugbe Maurice Joel Ugbe, Emmanuel Edet Effa, Joel Inyang, Bassey Ebenso, Fatumo Abdi, Chikezie Okwesileze, Bassey Ewa Ekeng, Ita Okokon Ita, John Walley
{"title":"Health workers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices relating to antimicrobial use and resistance in cross river state, Nigeria: a cross sectional study.","authors":"Akaninyene Asuquo Otu, Obiageli Chiezey Onwusaka, Ubong Aniefiok Udoh, Ugbe Maurice Joel Ugbe, Emmanuel Edet Effa, Joel Inyang, Bassey Ebenso, Fatumo Abdi, Chikezie Okwesileze, Bassey Ewa Ekeng, Ita Okokon Ita, John Walley","doi":"10.1186/s41043-026-01274-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global health issue with health workers (HWs) being central to addressing this issue. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, perceptions, and practices of HWs regarding antimicrobial use/AMR in Cross River State, Nigeria. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional survey involved 431 HWs in randomly selected healthcare facilities (13 primary and 23 secondary facilities) in Cross River State. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential analysis were performed using SPSS version 23. RESULTS: Of 431 HWs approached, 427 (99.1%) responded. Nurses comprised the largest group (37%), followed by medical doctors (26.5%). Overall, 60% of the respondents demonstrated good knowledge 30% demonstrated moderate knowledge, and 10% demonstrated poor knowledge of AMR and antimicrobial use. Perceptions were positive, with 81% categorized as good. Practices were good in 65% (of consenting HWs although 54.3% (n = 232) admitted to prescribing antibiotics not in accordance with guidelines. Identified gaps included prescribing due to patient pressure (47%) and stock availability (66%). Professional role (χ² = 41.72, df = 18, p = 0.001) and years of experience (χ² = 26.78, df = 10, p = 0.013) were significantly associated with good knowledge. Also, professional role (χ² = 28.41, df = 9, p = 0.001) and years of experience χ² = 14.67, df = 5, p = 0.012) were significantly associated with good practices. No statistically significant associations were found with perceptions. CONCLUSION: HWs in Cross River State exhibited predominantly good knowledge and perceptions of AMR, but practices, though good, revealed areas for improvement, particularly in guideline adherence and resistance to external pressures. </p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13270825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-026-01274-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global health issue with health workers (HWs) being central to addressing this issue. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, perceptions, and practices of HWs regarding antimicrobial use/AMR in Cross River State, Nigeria. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional survey involved 431 HWs in randomly selected healthcare facilities (13 primary and 23 secondary facilities) in Cross River State. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential analysis were performed using SPSS version 23. RESULTS: Of 431 HWs approached, 427 (99.1%) responded. Nurses comprised the largest group (37%), followed by medical doctors (26.5%). Overall, 60% of the respondents demonstrated good knowledge 30% demonstrated moderate knowledge, and 10% demonstrated poor knowledge of AMR and antimicrobial use. Perceptions were positive, with 81% categorized as good. Practices were good in 65% (of consenting HWs although 54.3% (n = 232) admitted to prescribing antibiotics not in accordance with guidelines. Identified gaps included prescribing due to patient pressure (47%) and stock availability (66%). Professional role (χ² = 41.72, df = 18, p = 0.001) and years of experience (χ² = 26.78, df = 10, p = 0.013) were significantly associated with good knowledge. Also, professional role (χ² = 28.41, df = 9, p = 0.001) and years of experience χ² = 14.67, df = 5, p = 0.012) were significantly associated with good practices. No statistically significant associations were found with perceptions. CONCLUSION: HWs in Cross River State exhibited predominantly good knowledge and perceptions of AMR, but practices, though good, revealed areas for improvement, particularly in guideline adherence and resistance to external pressures.

尼日利亚克罗斯河州卫生工作者关于抗菌素使用和耐药性的知识、观念和做法:一项横断面研究。
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个严重的全球卫生问题,卫生工作者(HWs)是解决这一问题的核心。本研究旨在评估尼日利亚克罗斯河州卫生工作者关于抗菌药物使用/抗菌素耐药性的知识、观念和做法。方法:这项横断面调查涉及克罗斯河州随机选择的卫生保健机构(13个初级机构和23个二级机构)的431名卫生保健工作者。使用结构化问卷收集数据。采用SPSS version 23进行描述性和推断性分析。结果:在就诊的431名HWs中,427名(99.1%)有应答。护士是最大的群体(37%),其次是医生(26.5%)。总体而言,60%的答复者表现出良好的知识,30%表现出中等程度的知识,10%表现出对抗菌素耐药性和抗微生物药物使用的知识较差。人们的看法是积极的,81%的人认为很好。尽管54.3% (n = 232)承认未按照指南开抗生素,但65%(同意的卫生工作者)的做法良好。确定的差距包括由于患者压力(47%)和库存可用性(66%)而开出的处方。专业角色(χ²= 41.72,df = 18, p = 0.001)和工作年限(χ²= 26.78,df = 10, p = 0.013)与知识水平显著相关。此外,专业角色(χ²= 28.41,df = 9, p = 0.001)和经验年限(χ²= 14.67,df = 5, p = 0.012)与良好实践显著相关。没有发现与认知有统计学意义的关联。结论:克罗斯河州的卫生保健人员主要表现出对抗菌素耐药性的良好认识和认知,但实践虽然良好,但显示出需要改进的领域,特别是在指南的遵守和对外部压力的抵抗力方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书