Cadence and tibial acceleration in runners with and without patellofemoral pain.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-11 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.70124
José Roberto de Souza Júnior, Glauber Marques Paraizo Barbosa, Leonardo Luiz Barretti Secchi, Maikon Gleibyson Rodrigues Dos Santos, Thiago Vilela Lemos, João Paulo Chieregato Matheus
{"title":"Cadence and tibial acceleration in runners with and without patellofemoral pain.","authors":"José Roberto de Souza Júnior, Glauber Marques Paraizo Barbosa, Leonardo Luiz Barretti Secchi, Maikon Gleibyson Rodrigues Dos Santos, Thiago Vilela Lemos, João Paulo Chieregato Matheus","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the main injuries in runners and the most common site of injury during ultramarathon races. The association between running biomechanics and PFP has been investigated over the years and conflicting to moderate evidence were found for kinematic and kinetic aspects. Differences in cadence and tibial acceleration should be investigated, as they are accessible variables used in gait retraining.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the cadence and peak vertical tibial acceleration between runners with PFP and pain-free controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study with 53 recreational rearfoot strike runners (PFP n = 27; Controls n = 26). All participants ran at 10 km/h on a motorized treadmill (Movement XL 1600) for 1 minute with the Tgforce accelerometer (v2.0.0.10) fixed to the anteromedial region of the right tibia above the medial malleolus. Cadence (steps/min) and vertical acceleration of the tibia (g) were measured. A significance level of α = 0.05 was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Values of 164.22 (8.08) steps/min and 6.88 (2.01) g were found for participants with PFP, whereas 171.53 (9.89) steps/min and 6.62 (1.55) g were found for the pain-free controls. A significant difference was found for cadence (p = .007; d = 0.80) but not for vertical tibial acceleration (p > .05; d = 0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with PFP had lower cadence values when compared to healthy runners. However, differences in tibial vertical acceleration were not found. Future studies should evaluate other aspects that can discriminate between healthy runners and those with PFP.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"1204-1210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the main injuries in runners and the most common site of injury during ultramarathon races. The association between running biomechanics and PFP has been investigated over the years and conflicting to moderate evidence were found for kinematic and kinetic aspects. Differences in cadence and tibial acceleration should be investigated, as they are accessible variables used in gait retraining.

Objective: To compare the cadence and peak vertical tibial acceleration between runners with PFP and pain-free controls.

Methods: Cross-sectional study with 53 recreational rearfoot strike runners (PFP n = 27; Controls n = 26). All participants ran at 10 km/h on a motorized treadmill (Movement XL 1600) for 1 minute with the Tgforce accelerometer (v2.0.0.10) fixed to the anteromedial region of the right tibia above the medial malleolus. Cadence (steps/min) and vertical acceleration of the tibia (g) were measured. A significance level of α = 0.05 was adopted.

Results: Values of 164.22 (8.08) steps/min and 6.88 (2.01) g were found for participants with PFP, whereas 171.53 (9.89) steps/min and 6.62 (1.55) g were found for the pain-free controls. A significant difference was found for cadence (p = .007; d = 0.80) but not for vertical tibial acceleration (p > .05; d = 0.21).

Conclusion: Participants with PFP had lower cadence values when compared to healthy runners. However, differences in tibial vertical acceleration were not found. Future studies should evaluate other aspects that can discriminate between healthy runners and those with PFP.

有或没有髌骨疼痛的跑步者的节奏和胫骨加速。
背景:髌股疼痛(PFP)是跑步者的主要损伤之一,也是超级马拉松比赛中最常见的损伤部位。多年来,人们一直在研究跑步生物力学和PFP之间的关系,在运动学和动力学方面发现了相互矛盾的证据。节奏和胫骨加速度的差异应该被调查,因为它们是步态再训练中可用的变量。目的:比较PFP组和无痛组跑步者的节奏和峰值垂直胫骨加速度。方法:对53名休闲后足打击跑步者进行横断面研究(PFP n = 27;对照组n = 26)。所有参与者在一台电动跑步机上(运动XL 1600)以10公里/小时的速度跑1分钟,Tgforce加速度计(v2.0.0.10)固定在内侧内踝上方的右胫骨前内侧区域。测量步伐(步数/分钟)和胫骨垂直加速度(g)。采用显著性水平α = 0.05。结果:PFP参与者的值为164.22(8.08)步/分钟和6.88 (2.01)g,而无痛对照组的值为171.53(9.89)步/分钟和6.62 (1.55)g。节律有显著性差异(p = 0.007; d = 0.80),但胫骨垂直加速度无显著性差异(p = 0.05; d = 0.21)。结论:与健康跑步者相比,PFP参与者的节奏值较低。然而,胫骨垂直加速度没有发现差异。未来的研究应该评估其他可以区分健康跑步者和PFP者的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书